Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Politics
 The Pledge of Allegiance is in the news again
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

LyricalReckoner
New Member

USA
21 Posts

Posted - 02/28/2003 :  19:14:53  Show Profile  Visit LyricalReckoner's Homepage Send LyricalReckoner a Private Message

The Pledge of Allegiance is in the news yet again. This afternoon, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the Bush administration's request for the court to reconsider the Newdow case.

And there were some sparks flying; e.g. judges -- folks you expect to be polite -- got to calling each other . . . well . . . stupid.

Here's a link to what Reuters had to say about it:

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/nm/20030301/ts_nm/life_pledge_dc

Here's a link to an essay I just finished about this:

http://www.misterthorne.org/ESSAYS/SCFA_art_01.htm


And here's a link to last month's issue of Religion in the News. The commentary discusses Supreme Court rulings concerning such matters:

http://www.misterthorne.org/NEWS/JAN_2003.htm


Enjoy!


Tokyodreamer
SFN Regular

USA
1447 Posts

Posted - 02/28/2003 :  20:49:17   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Tokyodreamer a Private Message
From the Yahoo! article:

quote:
But Judge Diarmuid O'Scannlain disagreed..."If reciting the Pledge is truly a 'religious act' in violation of the Establishment Clause then so is a recitation of the Constitution itself, the Declaration of Independence, the Gettysburg Address, the National Motto or the singing of the National Anthem," he wrote, in reference to the fact that all of the above refer to God.


Absolute bullshit. Unless I'm mistaken, the Constitution makes no mention of God, the DoI does not mention God ("God" is obviously referring to the Judeo-Xian God, of which the "Creator" is not), the National Motto most definitely is in violation, and the National Anthem doesn't mention God (at least in the only verse that is ever sung)!

I can't believe the article printed these lies.

[I just searched the Constitution, and no instances of the word "God" nor the word "Creator" are present.]
Edited by - Tokyodreamer on 02/28/2003 20:52:43
Go to Top of Page

PhDreamer
SFN Regular

USA
925 Posts

Posted - 02/28/2003 :  22:31:10   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit PhDreamer's Homepage Send PhDreamer a Private Message
O'Scannlain's opinion illustrates just how intellectually empty are the main pro-"under God" arguments. His reasoning is so absurd, it borders on satire.

I believe that, as a species, human beings define their reality through suffering and misery.
-Agent Smith
Go to Top of Page

@tomic
Administrator

USA
4607 Posts

Posted - 02/28/2003 :  23:51:59   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit @tomic's Homepage Send @tomic a Private Message
You have to wonder how someone so illiterate in law became a judge in the first place.

@tomic

Gravity, not just a good idea...it's the law!

Sportsbettingacumen.com: The science of sports betting
Go to Top of Page

NubiWan
Skeptic Friend

USA
424 Posts

Posted - 03/01/2003 :  00:54:12   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send NubiWan a Private Message
Uh.., by gaining control of the congress, the presidency, and thereby controling judicial appointments?

Go to Top of Page

Antie
Skeptic Friend

USA
101 Posts

Posted - 03/04/2003 :  00:08:26   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Antie's Homepage  Send Antie an ICQ Message Send Antie a Private Message
> Absolute bullshit. Unless I'm mistaken, the Constitution makes no
> mention of God

Desperate people like to point out how it mentions "in the Year of our Lord."

Antie. DIES GAUDII.


Facies Fabulosarum Feminarum

If you can name all six of the females in the picture above without looking up their names, and you can read the Latin phrase, pat yourself on the back. You're smart.
Go to Top of Page

Gorgo
SFN Die Hard

USA
5310 Posts

Posted - 03/04/2003 :  06:19:38   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Gorgo a Private Message
I had someone tell me once that that was proof there was a god.
quote:

Desperate people like to point out how it mentions "in the Year of our Lord."


I know the rent is in arrears
The dog has not been fed in years
It's even worse than it appears
But it's alright-
Jerry Garcia
Robert Hunter



Edited by - Gorgo on 03/04/2003 06:35:18
Go to Top of Page

walt fristoe
SFN Regular

USA
505 Posts

Posted - 03/13/2003 :  12:01:26   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send walt fristoe a Private Message
Check out this editiorial cartoon.

"If God chose George Bus of all the people in the world, how good could God be?"
Bill Maher
Go to Top of Page

Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie

USA
4826 Posts

Posted - 03/13/2003 :  13:13:06   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Valiant Dancer's Homepage Send Valiant Dancer a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by PhDreamer

O'Scannlain's opinion illustrates just how intellectually empty are the main pro-"under God" arguments. His reasoning is so absurd, it borders on satire.



I find it infuriating that they always focus on the words instead of the blatantly illegal law which added them to the Pledge in the first place. They say the wording is what is at issue. It isn't. Religious references within laws are not in an of themselves illegal. Questionable, but not outright illegal. As long as the law has a valid secular reason (the 1954 Act does not), it may stand.

The pro-God folks always seem to concentrate on the words instead of the law. How curious.

Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils

Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion
Go to Top of Page

PhDreamer
SFN Regular

USA
925 Posts

Posted - 03/13/2003 :  15:09:00   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit PhDreamer's Homepage Send PhDreamer a Private Message
What slays me is O'Scannlain's reasoning establishes a false dichotomy thusly:

a) Pledge that contains "under God" = neutral/deistic
b) Pledge that does not contain "under God" = atheistic

By extension, any document or pledge or phrase explicitly recognized by the government that does not include a reference to a deity is atheistic. Just mind-bogglingly stupid.

I believe that, as a species, human beings define their reality through suffering and misery.
-Agent Smith
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.09 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000