Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Politics
 Due process.... ?
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Dude
SFN Die Hard

USA
6891 Posts

Posted - 06/28/2004 :  13:18:29  Show Profile Send Dude a Private Message
Looks like US citizens are now officially able to be called "enemy combatant" and detained forever with no access to the legal system.

I'm moving to New Zealand.....


quote:
AP file Court rules U.S. can hold
citizen as ‘enemy combatant'
But justices say detainees can mount
legal challenge to harsh treatment.

BREAKING NEWS

MSNBC staff and news service reports
Updated: 10:23 a.m. ET June 28, 2004WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court delivered a partial victory to the Bush administration in its war on terrorism Monday, ruling narrowly that Congress gave President Bush the power to hold an American citizen without charges or trial, but that the detainee can challenge his treatment in court.


The ruling did not fully address other hard questions raised by the case of Yaser Esam Hamdi, detained more than two years and only recently allowed to see a lawyer. His parents are Saudis and he was born in the United States.

The administration had fought any suggestion that Hamdi or another U.S.-born terrorism suspect, Jose Padilla, could go to court, saying a legal fight was a threat to the president's power to wage war as he sees fit.

"We have no reason to doubt that courts faced with these sensitive matters will pay proper heed both to the matters of national security that might arise in an individual case and to the constitutional limitations safeguarding essential liberties that remain vibrant even in times of security concerns," Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote for the court.

O'Connor said that Hamdi "unquestionably has the right to access to counsel."

The Associated Press contributed to this report.


Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong.
-- Thomas Jefferson

"god :: the last refuge of a man with no answers and no argument." - G. Carlin

Hope, n.
The handmaiden of desperation; the opiate of despair; the illegible signpost on the road to perdition. ~~ da filth

Gorgo
SFN Die Hard

USA
5310 Posts

Posted - 06/28/2004 :  13:50:50   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Gorgo a Private Message
Just bizarre.

I know the rent is in arrears
The dog has not been fed in years
It's even worse than it appears
But it's alright-
Jerry Garcia
Robert Hunter



Go to Top of Page

Terryt88
Skeptic Friend

USA
120 Posts

Posted - 06/28/2004 :  14:50:32   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Terryt88 a Yahoo! Message Send Terryt88 a Private Message
quote:

I'm moving to New Zealand...


New Zealand you say... Hey look me up.
Go to Top of Page

Stargirl
Skeptic Friend

USA
94 Posts

Posted - 06/28/2004 :  17:43:43   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Stargirl a Private Message
Fortunately it wasn't a total victory for Bush and his people.
And the SCOTUS did say that Congress gave him the power, which means that Congress should be able to take it away. Although I doubt the republican controlled House and Senate would even think of curtailing Bush in his mad quest to eliminate haul off anyone who doesn't believe in Truth, Justice, and The American way, well okay in his ultra conservative, fundamentalist Christian way.
I also noticed that one of the rulings only applies to the detainees at Guantanamo bay in Cuba and not to other foreign locations where detainees are being held. How long do you think it will take before the administration ships these guys out of Cuba to another probably undisclosed foreign location that isn't covered by the ruling?
Reading some of the articles I got the impression that a number of the members on the SCOTUS weren't particularly happy with their limited rulings.
Just to be on the safe side it might be a good idea if someone sent the members of the SCOTUS a copy of the book “Judgment at Nuremberg”. For those who may not know it's about the Post WWII trial of German Judges who gave in to political pressure and nationalist zeal and ended up subverting the Constitution. That is the German Constitution, which believe it or not actually prohibited most of the acts in which the Nazis engaged. At least they should watch the movie; it's a might long and a bit slow in spots but heck it's got Spencer Tracy, Burt Lancaster, Judy Garland, Colonel Klink, that is Werner Klemperer, and even Captain Kirk Himself William Shatner.

If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him - Voltaire
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.06 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000