Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Creation/Evolution
 HERV: SkepticTimes debate topic
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 5

Peptide
Skeptic Friend

USA
69 Posts

Posted - 10/08/2004 :  13:23:59  Show Profile Send Peptide a Private Message
I opened this topic to get help in writing one of the arguments that I will use at the skeptictimes debate.

For all of those unfamiliar witht he HERV argument, talkorigins.org has a pretty good explanation: http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/section4.html#retroviruses

I would greatly appreciate any references (especially primary lit) that pertains to the following points:

1. Production of ERV sequences: Explain how viral sequences become part of an organisms genome. Show that the insertions are random and rare.

2. ERV and Common Ancestory: Explain the pattern that would be expected if common ancestory was true. In other words, explaint he predictions born out of the theory of evolution. Then, explain how the pattern of ERV's in orangutans, gorillas, chimps, and humans supports the cladistic tree derived from the morphological comparisons.

3. ERV and Intelligent Design: Show that viral insertions do not differ from any other mutation. That is, ERV's can be either neutral, beneficial, or detrimental to fitness. Also, explain that a designer would not have to adhere to the pattern predicted by evolution (eg "Why would God be required to follow the pattern predicted by evolution? Simply, he isn't required to do so."). Also, require that anyone claiming that all ERV sequence impact "design" must use evidence to support their claim.

Any other suggestions?

Ricky
SFN Die Hard

USA
4907 Posts

Posted - 10/08/2004 :  16:31:25   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Ricky an AOL message Send Ricky a Private Message
I'll be posting more as I find more stuff, but I found something at an unlikely "source" (I don't think you can call it that):

http://www.christianforums.com/t96639

While it doesn't really have any new information about it, it has attempted Creationist rebuttals.

Why continue? Because we must. Because we have the call. Because it is nobler to fight for rationality without winning than to give up in the face of continued defeats. Because whatever true progress humanity makes is through the rationality of the occasional individual and because any one individual we may win for the cause may do more for humanity than a hundred thousand who hug their superstitions to their breast.
- Isaac Asimov
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 10/08/2004 :  17:11:15   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message
Actually, WinAce's posts at the start of that thread appear to be well-sourced, themselves. And good grief, the thread has over 200 posts in it.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Ricky
SFN Die Hard

USA
4907 Posts

Posted - 10/08/2004 :  19:05:28   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Ricky an AOL message Send Ricky a Private Message
Oh wow, didn't even notice that. I had no idea those orange things were links... I just took skimmed through it.

Why continue? Because we must. Because we have the call. Because it is nobler to fight for rationality without winning than to give up in the face of continued defeats. Because whatever true progress humanity makes is through the rationality of the occasional individual and because any one individual we may win for the cause may do more for humanity than a hundred thousand who hug their superstitions to their breast.
- Isaac Asimov
Go to Top of Page

Dr. Mabuse
Septic Fiend

Sweden
9688 Posts

Posted - 10/09/2004 :  03:44:06   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Dr. Mabuse an ICQ Message Send Dr. Mabuse a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Dave W.

Actually, WinAce's posts at the start of that thread appear to be well-sourced, themselves. And good grief, the thread has over 200 posts in it.

It's interesting that the posts of the first three pages of the thread are just ways to bump the thread. After a month's time, someone belonging to "another church" asks for a clarification of the term "endigenous retroviruse". The thread started at the end of February.
Page 4 and forward is dedicated to a theist wanting clarification on issues regarding how we can tell retrovirus-DNA from animal cells and such. It isn't until the end of August before anyone seriously tried to refute it.

(edited for grammar)

Dr. Mabuse - "When the going gets tough, the tough get Duct-tape..."
Dr. Mabuse whisper.mp3

"Equivocation is not just a job, for a creationist it's a way of life..." Dr. Mabuse

Support American Troops in Iraq:
Send them unarmed civilians for target practice..
Collateralmurder.
Edited by - Dr. Mabuse on 10/09/2004 13:18:19
Go to Top of Page

tomk80
SFN Regular

Netherlands
1278 Posts

Posted - 10/11/2004 :  03:53:17   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit tomk80's Homepage Send tomk80 a Private Message
As is a current practice on most more technical posts on Christianforums. These tend to be ignored by creationists most of the time.

Tom

`Contrariwise,' continued Tweedledee, `if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.'
-Through the Looking Glass by Lewis Caroll-
Go to Top of Page

Peptide
Skeptic Friend

USA
69 Posts

Posted - 10/11/2004 :  10:30:40   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Peptide a Private Message
Yeah, I post as "Loudmouth" on christianforums and am active in that thread. The best reference is http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15314653. This reference gives a map of over 3,000 active retroviral insertions of which none occur at the same nucleotide position. In recent months I was unable to find a reference showing this type of map.
Go to Top of Page

Peptide
Skeptic Friend

USA
69 Posts

Posted - 10/11/2004 :  10:31:59   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Peptide a Private Message
The link above is broken, go here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15314653
Go to Top of Page

BigPapaSmurf
SFN Die Hard

3192 Posts

Posted - 10/11/2004 :  11:15:27   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send BigPapaSmurf a Private Message
"a map of over 3,000 active retroviral insertions of which none occur at the same nucleotide position"

I think one of the biggest problems is the lack of comprehension, The previous statment might as well say, srkhfoihrfn sjf psrjpfg sojrgpfijhe phgpiojjf, DUH! About one in a million creationists would understand you.

"...things I have neither seen nor experienced nor heard tell of from anybody else; things, what is more, that do not in fact exist and could not ever exist at all. So my readers must not believe a word I say." -Lucian on his book True History

"...They accept such things on faith alone, without any evidence. So if a fraudulent and cunning person who knows how to take advantage of a situation comes among them, he can make himself rich in a short time." -Lucian critical of early Christians c.166 AD From his book, De Morte Peregrini
Go to Top of Page

Dude
SFN Die Hard

USA
6891 Posts

Posted - 10/11/2004 :  11:31:07   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Dude a Private Message
To quote a quote from another thread...

It's to bad ignorance isn't painfull.



Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong.
-- Thomas Jefferson

"god :: the last refuge of a man with no answers and no argument." - G. Carlin

Hope, n.
The handmaiden of desperation; the opiate of despair; the illegible signpost on the road to perdition. ~~ da filth
Go to Top of Page

Peptide
Skeptic Friend

USA
69 Posts

Posted - 10/11/2004 :  18:27:59   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Peptide a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by BigPapaSmurf

"a map of over 3,000 active retroviral insertions of which none occur at the same nucleotide position"

I think one of the biggest problems is the lack of comprehension, The previous statment might as well say, srkhfoihrfn sjf psrjpfg sojrgpfijhe phgpiojjf, DUH! About one in a million creationists would understand you.



Does this sound better?

"It was found that even after 3,000 infections by three different retroviruses there was not one viral insertion that occured at the same spot in the DNA."
Go to Top of Page

Ricky
SFN Die Hard

USA
4907 Posts

Posted - 10/11/2004 :  20:59:40   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Ricky an AOL message Send Ricky a Private Message
Much better. I think our average Creationist can understand that. It kind of plays on their argument that evolution is too unlikely to happen, that the odds are too great.

Why continue? Because we must. Because we have the call. Because it is nobler to fight for rationality without winning than to give up in the face of continued defeats. Because whatever true progress humanity makes is through the rationality of the occasional individual and because any one individual we may win for the cause may do more for humanity than a hundred thousand who hug their superstitions to their breast.
- Isaac Asimov
Go to Top of Page

Dude
SFN Die Hard

USA
6891 Posts

Posted - 10/11/2004 :  22:09:50   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Dude a Private Message
You may have to define retrovirus and explain what reverse transcriptase does....

Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong.
-- Thomas Jefferson

"god :: the last refuge of a man with no answers and no argument." - G. Carlin

Hope, n.
The handmaiden of desperation; the opiate of despair; the illegible signpost on the road to perdition. ~~ da filth
Go to Top of Page

H. Humbert
SFN Die Hard

USA
4574 Posts

Posted - 10/11/2004 :  22:34:10   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send H. Humbert a Private Message
When does this debate start again? When are the first rounds of posts going up? And are the two opposing arguments posted simultaneously, or does one side have to go first?


"A man is his own easiest dupe, for what he wishes to be true he generally believes to be true." --Demosthenes

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool." --Richard P. Feynman

"Face facts with dignity." --found inside a fortune cookie
Go to Top of Page

Ricky
SFN Die Hard

USA
4907 Posts

Posted - 10/11/2004 :  22:37:17   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Ricky an AOL message Send Ricky a Private Message
"We" [Peptide] goes first, and Creationist present their opening arguments a week later. tk has said in the rules that they are not allowed to address anything brought up by us in their opening post.

And I agree with Dude, a definition of retrovirus (although where in that definition was reverse transcriptase?).

Edit: first post is supposed to occur in 3 days (Friday). Peptide, we have chats 7-9pm (pacific) on Wednesdays, so you can join us in there if you are not finished with your opening arguments by then (or join us anyways).

Why continue? Because we must. Because we have the call. Because it is nobler to fight for rationality without winning than to give up in the face of continued defeats. Because whatever true progress humanity makes is through the rationality of the occasional individual and because any one individual we may win for the cause may do more for humanity than a hundred thousand who hug their superstitions to their breast.
- Isaac Asimov
Edited by - Ricky on 10/11/2004 22:40:15
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 10/12/2004 :  06:12:08   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message
Ricky wrote:
quote:
Edit: first post is supposed to occur in 3 days (Friday).
Which I guess is just another example of tkster's unreliability... After all, in the debate thread, he wrote, "Peptide you have until October 14th to post." And the 14th is Thursday.

Actually, it says "until" the 14th, which could mean that posting after tomorrow would be "late." Who the heck knows how he's going to interpret his own words?

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 5 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Next Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.17 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000