Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Creation/Evolution
 My argument against evolution
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 11

ASR
Skeptic Friend

69 Posts

Posted - 10/12/2005 :  12:42:00   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit ASR's Homepage Send ASR a Private Message
quote:

How do you know they don't?



Don't you think we would have seen it by now? You accept evolution based upon logic, logically ants do not have emotion.

From the moon they looked down to see if we measured up
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 10/12/2005 :  12:42:32   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by ASR

quote:
Originally posted by beskeptigal

quote:
Originally posted by ASR

If philosophy is completely unrelated to the brain and evolution then why can't ants philosophy?

How do you know they can't?

Philosophy is a noun.
Philosophize is the verb.


Because in their billions of years in existence they have never done anything creative. Creative = Philosophy. Thanks for fixing my typo.

Erm, in their millions of years they have not done anything creative. But not true, alas. I refer again to the leaf-cutter ants. These cut bits of leaf and take them back to the nest, there, they are not eaten but are mulched and given to a growing fungus that is the colony's food sorce. That is certainly a form of creativity.

Further creativity can be seen in soldier ants, that have no perminant nest. When they stop their march for the night, the workers hook their legs together creating a temporary but snug shelter. They will do the same when the colony needs to cross a small stream, creating a bridge

Further creativity can be found in mound-building termites. These have carefully constructed venelation ducts that are placed in such a position as to catch the prevailing winds and cool the colony. If conditions change, the termites change the ducts.

I think that one should be very careful when disussing creativity in animal behavior. It shows up in some very odd places and rather strange forms.

Edited to add: all of this is, of course, evolved behavior, but it had to begin sometime, and then, it was brand new. Who is to say that similar can not happen again? And, perhaps, is happening right now?


"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Edited by - filthy on 10/12/2005 12:47:08
Go to Top of Page

ASR
Skeptic Friend

69 Posts

Posted - 10/12/2005 :  12:51:25   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit ASR's Homepage Send ASR a Private Message
My slippers...they're unnecessary. Why don't they do anything unnecessary?

From the moon they looked down to see if we measured up
Go to Top of Page

Siberia
SFN Addict

Brazil
2322 Posts

Posted - 10/12/2005 :  12:52:23   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Siberia's Homepage  Send Siberia an AOL message  Send Siberia a Yahoo! Message Send Siberia a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by ASR

quote:
Originally posted by Siberia

ASR, you ask why ants don't ants have creative thought.
I ask, define creativity.


The ability to conceive things that do not have a physical property. Money, democracy, God.


And who says they don't? How can you know what goes in an ant's mind (if there is such thing as an ant mind, at all)? And why is creativity limited to non-physical things? Is art not creative? It is pretty physical, too.

"Why are you afraid of something you're not even sure exists?"
- The Kovenant, Via Negativa

"People who don't like their beliefs being laughed at shouldn't have such funny beliefs."
-- unknown
Go to Top of Page

Siberia
SFN Addict

Brazil
2322 Posts

Posted - 10/12/2005 :  12:55:54   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Siberia's Homepage  Send Siberia an AOL message  Send Siberia a Yahoo! Message Send Siberia a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by ASR

My slippers...they're unnecessary. Why don't they do anything unnecessary?


No, they aren't unnecessary. You may think they are, now, but if you wear slippers today, it is because primitive men realized that, if they protected their feet from the environment, their feet would become more functional and/or hurt less. This bit of knowledge they passed to their children and so forth and today you're wearing slippers. Pretty mundane.

"Why are you afraid of something you're not even sure exists?"
- The Kovenant, Via Negativa

"People who don't like their beliefs being laughed at shouldn't have such funny beliefs."
-- unknown
Edited by - Siberia on 10/12/2005 12:56:59
Go to Top of Page

ASR
Skeptic Friend

69 Posts

Posted - 10/12/2005 :  13:02:12   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit ASR's Homepage Send ASR a Private Message
So once upon a time an ant mulched some leaves and left it for consumption later. When he returned he found more food. It did not ask why there was more food, just knew that putting food there made more food. New ants followed him to get leaves, and followed his example. They did not ask why, this was just the way things were done, and so it continued to today.

From the moon they looked down to see if we measured up
Go to Top of Page

ASR
Skeptic Friend

69 Posts

Posted - 10/12/2005 :  13:03:41   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit ASR's Homepage Send ASR a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Siberia

quote:
Originally posted by ASR

My slippers...they're unnecessary. Why don't they do anything unnecessary?


No, they aren't unnecessary. You may think they are, now, but if you wear slippers today, it is because primitive men realized that, if they protected their feet from the environment, their feet would become more functional and/or hurt less. This bit of knowledge they passed to their children and so forth and today you're wearing slippers. Pretty mundane.



OK score one for science...logic, call it what you will.

From the moon they looked down to see if we measured up
Go to Top of Page

ASR
Skeptic Friend

69 Posts

Posted - 10/12/2005 :  13:06:09   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit ASR's Homepage Send ASR a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Siberia

quote:
Originally posted by ASR

quote:
Originally posted by Siberia

ASR, you ask why ants don't ants have creative thought.
I ask, define creativity.


The ability to conceive things that do not have a physical property. Money, democracy, God.


And who says they don't? How can you know what goes in an ant's mind (if there is such thing as an ant mind, at all)? And why is creativity limited to non-physical things? Is art not creative? It is pretty physical, too.


Art is the mix of science and philosophy if you read what I wrote on my website. It is the mix of something physical, as you said, and the mix of something philosophical, (beauty) who can define beauty? That's what makes it the opposite of science, science is all things that can be defined.

From the moon they looked down to see if we measured up
Go to Top of Page

ASR
Skeptic Friend

69 Posts

Posted - 10/12/2005 :  13:13:51   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit ASR's Homepage Send ASR a Private Message
all things that can be defined with yes or no i should say.

From the moon they looked down to see if we measured up
Go to Top of Page

furshur
SFN Regular

USA
1536 Posts

Posted - 10/12/2005 :  13:16:58   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send furshur a Private Message
quote:
Stating that evolution must have created it is a logical conundrum, given that it is not necessary for survival of the fittest. It has created murder, greed, despair,...all things that disrupt the natural equilibrium of evolution. Emotions put a kink in the works.

Nonsense! Do you really believe that our ability to to have emotions has not help mankind to survive and flourish.
Murder greed.. etc disurpt the natural equlibrium of evolution - bullshit! Please define the 'natural equilibrium of evolution'.

Dogs show love very convincingly, they also are very loyal, and have a great ability to communicate. Cats on the other hand (sorry cat lovers) don't. This is because dogs evolved this behaviour in a pack environment.

People just have bigger brains and our evolved behaviours are more intricate.



If I knew then what I know now then I would know more now than I know.
Go to Top of Page

ASR
Skeptic Friend

69 Posts

Posted - 10/12/2005 :  13:20:53   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit ASR's Homepage Send ASR a Private Message
Oh I recall how they mocked Freud...

From the moon they looked down to see if we measured up
Go to Top of Page

pleco
SFN Addict

USA
2998 Posts

Posted - 10/12/2005 :  13:24:06   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit pleco's Homepage Send pleco a Private Message
You aren't Freud.

by Filthy
The neo-con methane machine will soon be running at full fart.
Go to Top of Page

Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie

USA
4826 Posts

Posted - 10/12/2005 :  13:34:05   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Valiant Dancer's Homepage Send Valiant Dancer a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by ASR

quote:
Originally posted by Valiant Dancer

quote:
Originally posted by ASR

quote:
Originally posted by Siberia

ASR, you ask why ants don't ants have creative thought.
I ask, define creativity.


The ability to conceive things that do not have a physical property. Money, democracy, God.



And since we lack any mechanism by which to communicate these very complex concepts in a two way manner with these beings, how do you know the animals don't possess these things?

"The humans said they were more advanced than dolphins because they had the atomic bomb and New York. The dolphins claimed they were more advanced than humans and listed the same items." -- Paraphrased Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy


You all argue with me that I have no evidence to support my claims, yet turn around and make philosophical arguments in the same manner to refute. Make up your mind.



You have made the claim that ants lack philosophy. We are pointing out that you have no evidence for it. You have only given us philosophical arguements to refute as you have traveled far afield of any scientific arguement concerning evolution.

Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils

Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion
Go to Top of Page

ASR
Skeptic Friend

69 Posts

Posted - 10/12/2005 :  13:34:44   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit ASR's Homepage Send ASR a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by furshur

quote:
Stating that evolution must have created it is a logical conundrum, given that it is not necessary for survival of the fittest. It has created murder, greed, despair,...all things that disrupt the natural equilibrium of evolution. Emotions put a kink in the works.

Nonsense! Do you really believe that our ability to to have emotions has not help mankind to survive and flourish.
Murder greed.. etc disurpt the natural equlibrium of evolution - bullshit! Please define the 'natural equilibrium of evolution'.

Dogs show love very convincingly, they also are very loyal, and have a great ability to communicate. Cats on the other hand (sorry cat lovers) don't. This is because dogs evolved this behaviour in a pack environment.

People just have bigger brains and our evolved behaviours are more intricate.


War. Every species on the planet engages in killing to ensure survival of the species. We are one species that has civil wars, illogical wars. Nothing to gain from it, inspired by emotions. We are self destructive. This has nothing to do with survival of the fittest, it ruins a species chance for survival thus opposing the law of evolution's fittest. As for dogs, scientists have recently proven that animals do have emotions. As for cats, mine exhibited pride when catching a bird, shame when losing a rabbit, anger towards my sister when she got dogs, and purred whenever I was at hand.

From the moon they looked down to see if we measured up
Go to Top of Page

Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie

USA
4826 Posts

Posted - 10/12/2005 :  13:36:43   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Valiant Dancer's Homepage Send Valiant Dancer a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by ASR

quote:

How do you know they don't?



Don't you think we would have seen it by now? You accept evolution based upon logic, logically ants do not have emotion.



As philosophy is really complex and the lifespan of ants is incredibly breif, how do you know you haven't seen it?

I accept evolution based on logic and empirical evidence.

Ants not having emotion is conjecture, not logic.

Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils

Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 11 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.12 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000