Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Community Forums
 General Discussion
 Why Senator Leahy?
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

lpetrich
Skeptic Friend

USA
74 Posts

Posted - 11/17/2001 :  06:03:57  Show Profile Send lpetrich a Private Message
First Senator Tom Daschle, now Senator Pat Leahy. Who is the head of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

This most recent anthrax letter was written in the style of the others, and shared a fake return address -- which suggests that its creator was the same as that of the others.

But why him? This suggests a detailed knowledge of how the US political system works in practice. Which some foreign Islamist terrorist is not likely to have, but which some US right-winger is. Especially someone who follows right-wing talk-radio broadcasts such as Rush Limbaugh's, which often feature vilification of Congressional Democrats as guilty of terrible crimes against humanity.

I suspect that some Islamist terrorist would target Congress collectively, without regard for who's who, if he thought it worth targeting. In particular, our current President would be an especially juicy target, since he's the son of the President who first sent troops to Saudi Arabia to fight Iraq.

Donnie B.
Skeptic Friend

417 Posts

Posted - 11/17/2001 :  13:15:52   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Donnie B. a Private Message
I agree. Looks like this was home-grown terrorism, taking advantage of the 9/11 horror.

A quibble: the President isn't part of Congress; he's the head of the Executive branch, whereas Congress is the Legislative branch. But I know what you mean


-- Donnie B.

Brian: "No, no! You have to think for yourselves!" Crowd: "Yes! We have to think for ourselves!"
Go to Top of Page

lpetrich
Skeptic Friend

USA
74 Posts

Posted - 11/17/2001 :  16:27:14   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send lpetrich a Private Message
Sorry if I was a bit careless and let myself imply that the President is from the Congress. But the President is the Big Leader, and would thus be a juicy target; from a distance, Congress would look like a giant committee.

Our political system is somewhat complicated, and one would have to be intimately familiar with it to know how Congressional committees work.

And why target the head of the Senate Judiciary Committee? If I was some Islamist who wanted to terrorize the US Congress, my biggest villains would be those whose activities most immediately affect me and my fellow Islamists, such as the members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee? Why would I care about a committee involved in selecting judges? As opposed to one involved in agriculture or appropriations, for example?

URL for Congressional committees: http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/committees.html

I recall something from some weeks back about how some suspected Al Qaeda members had considered hitting the US "foreign minister" (Secretary of State), which is consistent with this view.

But if I was a real Islamist, I'd try to make the idol in NYC harbor go the way of the Bamiyan Buddhas


Edited by - lpetrich on 11/18/2001 00:17:46
Go to Top of Page

ljbrs
SFN Regular

USA
842 Posts

Posted - 11/24/2001 :  11:15:02   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send ljbrs a Private Message
quote:
Our political system is somewhat complicated, and one would have to be intimately familiar with it to know how Congressional committees work.

And why target the head of the Senate Judiciary Committee? If I was some Islamist who wanted to terrorize the US Congress, my biggest villains would be those whose activities most immediately affect me and my fellow Islamists, such as the members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee? Why would I care about a committee involved in selecting judges? As opposed to one involved in agriculture or appropriations, for example?



I agree that it must be a religious wacko who is involved here with the anthrax.

Don't these religious imbeciles realize that they are suggesting that their deity is so impotent that he/she/it cannot take care of the job by himself/herself/itself! Their deity needs an intermediary (them) to take care of things. That sounds immensely blasphemous to me. Any godhead worth his/her/its salt would become enraged at the very idea. Fire and brimstone for them!!!

Our religious wackos in this country have the same capability as the religious wackos of any faith. They are blasphemous to the core in their attempt to help their deity out! This sounds like a deity mafia of some kind or another -- getting the little guys to do the dirtywork.

ljbrs

*Nothing is more damaging to a new truth than an old error.* Goethe
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.08 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000