Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Media Issues
 Rush vs Michael
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

moakley
SFN Regular

USA
1888 Posts

Posted - 10/27/2006 :  05:24:27  Show Profile Send moakley a Private Message
Many of you have probably already seen this, but I found this disturbing. Especially since Rush still has an audience who eat this stuff up.

Life is good

Philosophy is questions that may never be answered. Religion is answers that may never be questioned. -Anonymous

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 10/27/2006 :  06:04:45   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message
Rush Limbaugh is a vile, slimey blob of rancid blubber. But I think.... I think....

I think that this time he's gone a little too far. Michael J. Fox is a very popular guy. Rush just might have stepped on his pecker (as opposed to having children in the Dominican Republic step on it for him) and alienated some of that audience along with the bulk of the rest of the country. He might also have dropped a large, brown one on the Republicans.

One hopes...




"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie

USA
4826 Posts

Posted - 10/27/2006 :  06:19:40   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Valiant Dancer's Homepage Send Valiant Dancer a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by moakley

Many of you have probably already seen this, but I found this disturbing. Especially since Rush still has an audience who eat this stuff up.



Heard about this one. "Swift boating" Fox.

What do ya expect from a drug addict?

Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils

Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion
Go to Top of Page

Robb
SFN Regular

USA
1223 Posts

Posted - 11/03/2006 :  12:06:46   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Robb a Private Message
Before I say anthing I just want to say that I think Rush is wrong and the Michael Fox has more credibility than Rush. I do not beleive Fox was acting or not on medication at the time.

With that said, why didn't the reporter go into any facts about the disease? He needed to get experts on the disease to come and say what the disease does and how the medication interacts with the disease. And show why Rush is wrong. Instead he gets another person that agrees with him and they go on to bash Rush and republicans in general. They also do not play the words to the add that is against government funding of stem cell research. They seem to assume that Rush is wrong without any concrete evidence. This is poor reporting in my estimation and just par for the course on both sides.

Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. - George Washington
Go to Top of Page

Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie

USA
4826 Posts

Posted - 11/12/2006 :  13:42:34   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Valiant Dancer's Homepage Send Valiant Dancer a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Robb

Before I say anthing I just want to say that I think Rush is wrong and the Michael Fox has more credibility than Rush. I do not beleive Fox was acting or not on medication at the time.

With that said, why didn't the reporter go into any facts about the disease? He needed to get experts on the disease to come and say what the disease does and how the medication interacts with the disease. And show why Rush is wrong. Instead he gets another person that agrees with him and they go on to bash Rush and republicans in general. They also do not play the words to the add that is against government funding of stem cell research. They seem to assume that Rush is wrong without any concrete evidence. This is poor reporting in my estimation and just par for the course on both sides.



I actually saw a different report where the reporter actually sat down with a doctor who studies the disease and explained the problems with Rush's analysis. Especailly since some of the drugs that are used to treat the condition can at times exacerbate the uncontrolled tremors and body movements of the condition.

The doctor's take was that Rush had no expertice in the field and had no concept of the effect of the condition or drugs to treat it.


Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils

Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion
Go to Top of Page

R.Wreck
SFN Regular

USA
1191 Posts

Posted - 11/12/2006 :  15:06:54   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send R.Wreck a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Valiant Dancer

The doctor's take was that Rush had no expertice in the field and had no concept of the effect of the condition or drugs to treat it.


You mean there is a drug that Rush Limpbag is unfamiliar with??!! Must not have any recreational potentail.

The foundation of morality is to . . . give up pretending to believe that for which there is no evidence, and repeating unintelligible propositions about things beyond the possibliities of knowledge.
T. H. Huxley

The Cattle Prod of Enlightened Compassion
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.06 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000