|
|
|
Dave W.
Info Junkie
USA
26022 Posts |
Posted - 12/05/2006 : 10:59:36
|
Perhaps the most famous example of an expert stepping out of his/her field to laughable consequences is that of Linus Pauling, a two-time Nobel Laureate (in chemistry and peace), who left his expertise in chemistry behind when he delved into medicine by claiming that massive doses of vitamin C could cure just about any disease. "Orthomolecular medicine" is today a field in which much money is wasted trying to bring Pauling's hype to real life.
In the December, 2006, issue of Discover magazine, I was interested in "The All-Time Essential Reading List," which bills itself as "the 25 greatest science books ever written." I expected the introduction to be about what makes a great science book great, but was instead treated to an essay about Kary B. Mullis' (Nobel prize for the polymerase chain reaction) favorite "science" books, which included these paragraphs:Dean Radin's book, Entangled Minds, extends this diabolical puzzle to extrasensory perception. ESP usually implies people sensing what has happened to a loved one thousands of miles away, but Radin describes something different: mind influencing matter. For the Global Consciousness Project, scientists set up 36 computer programs running separately, in different labs scattered around the earth, whose job is to generate random numbers. They do this by timing the decay of radioactive nuclei, which any physicist will agree occurs at random. Yet the results seem to be inexplicably affected by worldwide psychological reactions, like the ones sparked by the horrible events of 9/11. That is, they become less random—an effect analogous to a coin toss turning up heads many, many times in a row. Radin describes this as an unavoidable consequence of the interconnected, entangled physical reality we live in. I know Radin, and I know he's not intentionally fooling himself or anybody else.
Books like Radin's doggedly pursue scientific evidence for ideas that have been widely, but unreasonably, discredited for decades, or even centuries. Fortunately, scientists (at least in the Western world) no longer get confined to quarters or excommunicated for their books. But when an author puts himself on the line by embracing an unfashionable idea, even though he is guaranteed to generate scorn or indifference, this should somehow be recognized. Good grief. "...I know he's not intentionally fooling himself or anybody else." The first line of defense among the woo-woo set. Of course Radin isn't intentionally fooling himself, but there are plenty of ways in which he is unintentionally fooling himself, and from what I've read about the GCP, he's assumed his conclusion and is doing little more than cherry-picking data to fit - not science. Which makes Mullis' comment about it being an "unfashionable idea" ridiculous.
Mullis closes with praise for a book about the career of Peter Duesberg without once mentioning Duesberg's denial that HIV causes AIDS. Mullis hails the book as documenting the single example of a scientist changing his mind (Duesberg's denial of his own oncogene work in cancer), but it seems to me that Duesberg's AIDS stance simply shows him to be in favor of contradiction of the mainstream, and not some sort of scientific hero.
Mullis' introduction can be found here on the Web, and luckily neither Radin nor Duesberg appear in the actual list (which was put together by Discover editors, not Mullis), nor in the "honorable mentions" (which does include Freud's The Interpretation of Dreams).
The lesson to be learned, of course, is that one shouldn't trust a Nobel Laureate to necessarily be able to identify books on science.
Anyone else have any examples of the tremendous gaffs possible when Nobel winners (or other experts) step out of their fields?
|
- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail) Evidently, I rock! Why not question something for a change? Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too. |
|
furshur
SFN Regular
USA
1536 Posts |
Posted - 12/05/2006 : 12:58:12 [Permalink]
|
Dr. Manuel
For those of you who don't know who this is consider yourselves lucky.
|
If I knew then what I know now then I would know more now than I know. |
|
|
chaloobi
SFN Regular
1620 Posts |
Posted - 12/05/2006 : 13:06:18 [Permalink]
|
I just live this statement from Dave's quoted passage:
quote: Books like Radin's doggedly pursue scientific evidence for ideas that have been widely, but unreasonably, discredited for decades, or even centuries.
"Unreasonably" discredited? How has ESP been unreasonably discredited???? Thanks for reminding me why I don't read that pop-science rag. |
-Chaloobi
|
Edited by - chaloobi on 12/05/2006 13:06:46 |
|
|
Dave W.
Info Junkie
USA
26022 Posts |
Posted - 12/05/2006 : 13:39:38 [Permalink]
|
I should have hit up Wikipedia, earlier. Mullis...also denigrates concern about global warming, denying that it is known to be human caused, and disagrees with the idea that CFCs (chlorofluorocarbons) cause ozone depletion.
Mullis became known to a wider public as a potential forensic DNA analyst and witness for the defense in the OJ Simpson trial. News coverage of Mullis, his activities, and his background was extensive, and the defense moved to prevent cross-examination about his personal life including "social relationships, domestic discord and use of controlled substances."... I don't remember ever hearing about him before.
And yeah, furshur, Dr. Manuel is another good example. |
- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail) Evidently, I rock! Why not question something for a change? Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too. |
|
|
Neurosis
SFN Regular
USA
675 Posts |
Posted - 12/05/2006 : 14:23:58 [Permalink]
|
Well what are you gonna do about those surfer boys? |
Facts! Pssh, you can prove anything even remotely true with facts. - Homer Simpson
[God] is an infinite nothing from nowhere with less power over our universe than the secretary of agriculture. - Prof. Frink
Lisa: Yes, but wouldn't you rather know the truth than to delude yourself for happiness? Marge: Well... um.... [goes outside to jump on tampoline with Homer.] |
|
|
beskeptigal
SFN Die Hard
USA
3834 Posts |
|
HalfMooner
Dingaling
Philippines
15831 Posts |
Posted - 12/09/2006 : 23:20:02 [Permalink]
|
My nomination is British-born American physicist, transistor co-inventor, Nobel laureate, racist, eugenicist, and sperm-bank donor, William Shockley. He stepped way out of his field, off into the deep end of Nazi-style racism.
|
“Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|