Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Creation/Evolution
 Evolution in Washington state
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

@tomic
Administrator

USA
4607 Posts

Posted - 01/25/2002 :  20:02:11   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit @tomic's Homepage Send @tomic a Private Message
quote:
At least the way I define it.


I do too. While it would be nice if we could do whatever we want there are often unforseen results. This doesn't just apply to wildlife. Sometimes construction one place causes hillsides in another place to slide. We live too close together and our actions can affect others. Wildlife is also a concern and something we share. Property rights are important but that is hardly the whole story.

To me, people that put their property rights above all else are selfish, stupid and short sighted. There is also such a thing as shared property.

@tomic

Gravity, not just a good idea...it's the law!
Go to Top of Page

Tokyodreamer
SFN Regular

USA
1447 Posts

Posted - 01/25/2002 :  21:42:57   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Tokyodreamer a Private Message
quote:

Let's change that to 'anti-environmentalist'.


I'll buy that!

------------

Sum Ergo Cogito
Go to Top of Page

Tim
SFN Regular

USA
775 Posts

Posted - 01/26/2002 :  04:32:20   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Tim a Private Message
Wow, I'm really sorry that I was late for this little slice of arrogant ignorance in the great northwest. Anyway, I think Garrette answered the question of constitutionality perfectly. The only way this Bill could survive a court challenge is if they stacked the court with the author's family and friends, and they felt sorry for the poor shmuck.

There is one thing that would be interesting, though. If a bill like this would pass into law, would the courts have to rule on whose creator would have to be recognized before teaching "evil-ution" could be made unconstitutional? Afterall, the intent of the Bill of Rights was to protect a minority, wasn't it?

"The Constitution ..., is a marvelous document for self-government by Christian people. But the minute you turn the document into the hands of non-Christian and atheistic people they can use it to destroy the very foundation of our society."
Go to Top of Page

Tim
SFN Regular

USA
775 Posts

Posted - 01/26/2002 :  04:34:57   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Tim a Private Message
Sorry, the signature quote is Pat Robertson's from the 700 Club. I thought it might be related to the subject.

"The Constitution ..., is a marvelous document for self-government by Christian people. But the minute you turn the document into the hands of non-Christian and atheistic people they can use it to destroy the very foundation of our society."
Go to Top of Page

@tomic
Administrator

USA
4607 Posts

Posted - 01/26/2002 :  06:11:27   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit @tomic's Homepage Send @tomic a Private Message
I almost hate to say this but Washington State, years ago when pat Robertson Ran for President, was the only state to send it's delegates to the electoral college for pat. But we had a stupid system at the time that allowed a candidate to steal it but bussing party members to Caucases. I think, but don't promise, that that was fixed after that emarrassment.

@tomic

Gravity, not just a good idea...it's the law!
Go to Top of Page

Snake
SFN Addict

USA
2511 Posts

Posted - 01/27/2002 :  02:18:50   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Snake's Homepage  Send Snake an ICQ Message  Send Snake a Yahoo! Message Send Snake a Private Message
quote:

Wildlife is also a concern and something we share. Property rights are important but that is hardly the whole story.

To me, people that put their property rights above all else are selfish, stupid and short sighted. There is also such a thing as shared property.

@tomic


Don't think this has anything to do with the original link about that guy in Washington but:
Just a week or so ago in the news here in California there was a story about the property owner off the beach in Malibu not wanting to let the public past 'their' property to get to the ocean. THE OCEAN which belongs to the people of the state. This is an issue that has to do with a 'right of way' claus that they want to block. Now we have to wait and see if the rich home owners can fight the government to keep the public away from 'their' backyards.

**************
Rap Crap is to music what Paint by Numbers is to art!
Yes, I am NormaL!!
Carabao forever!!!

Edited by - snake on 01/27/2002 02:23:23
Go to Top of Page

Piltdown
Skeptic Friend

USA
312 Posts

Posted - 01/28/2002 :  12:46:00   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Piltdown an AOL message  Send Piltdown a Yahoo! Message Send Piltdown a Private Message
Hochstatter is a candidate for the Republican gubernatorial nomination in Washington. This quote from from his official webpage really jumped out at me.
http://www.src.wa.gov/news/pr/2001/hochstattered051501.htm
quote:
The players are God and man on one side, the courts and the parties on the other. God's side is clothed in brilliant light; the courts wear black robes, black hats, and steel spurs. God endows with life and liberty; the courts stop little kids from praying. They deal abortion in things natal and judicial.
Washingtonians are going to lose our blanket primary. God didn't say so, the courts did. In my district, the middle of the state, 68% of the people agree with me and God. We like our blanket primary. We can't contrive anything better.


This is really extreme even for a religious right insider. I wouldn't stoop to picking on the Senator's Germanic name, but I really have to wonder about his background. He is fond of quoting Goethe, it appears. In another article, he repeats an urban myth about Russian soldiers in Berlin at the end of World War 2. They supposedly stole light bulbs, and were dumbfounded to learn that these would not work without wiring and suitable sources of electric current. Russian troops may well have stolen light bulbs, but even the most backward Ivans would have been exposed to electric lights during their army service. They could not have helped but notice that these won't work just anywhere. Even if they hadn't, some of their more sophisticated comrades would quickly have "enlightened" them. This specific myth, it happens, is very common among European right-wingers, including neo-nazis.

Abducting UFOs and conspiring against conspiracy theorists since 1980.

Edited by - Piltdown on 01/28/2002 12:50:29
Go to Top of Page

Randy
SFN Regular

USA
1990 Posts

Posted - 02/28/2002 :  20:12:47   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Randy a Private Message
I think Mr. Dingleberry is trying to pull a carbon copy in his state of Washington with what was tried in Alabama a few years ago. Here's a link from the World of Dawkins to that similiar situation. Think Dawkins really nails it to the cross, so to speak...

http://www.world-of-dawkins.com/Dawkins/Work/Articles/alabama/alabama.htm

Randy


Go to Top of Page

Tokyodreamer
SFN Regular

USA
1447 Posts

Posted - 02/28/2002 :  20:32:48   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Tokyodreamer a Private Message
[quote]
I think Mr. Dingleberry is trying to pull a carbon copy in his state of Washington with what was tried in Alabama a few years ago. [/quote]

I really need to move. Anyone from San Diego? How's the weather there?



------------

Sum Ergo Cogito
Go to Top of Page

DVF
Skeptic Friend

USA
96 Posts

Posted - 03/01/2002 :  08:52:47   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send DVF a Private Message
[quote]
I really need to move.
- TD
[/quote]

Sure, run for civilization ya pansy. Not me. I'm going to stay right here in the deep south until I run out of people to offend. I'd organize a freethought rally, but me and the other 2 mississippi atheists have conflicting schedules.

The wages of sin is death, but the hours are good.
Go to Top of Page

Kaneda Kuonji
Skeptic Friend

USA
138 Posts

Posted - 03/01/2002 :  11:38:31   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Kaneda Kuonji a Private Message
Actually, there is a case in the Louisiana Supreme court that might prove promising. I'll have to hunt it down, but I'll provide it when I find it.

Shoot, the law itself is unconstitutional by a Supreme Court decision rendered in 1987. It conflicts with the separation of church and state!

Rodney Dean, CI Order of the Knights of Jubal
Ivbalis.org

Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.08 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000