Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Religion
 Supreme Court rules on 10 Commandments displays
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Marc_a_b
Skeptic Friend

USA
142 Posts

Posted - 02/25/2002 :  14:34:18  Show Profile  Send Marc_a_b an AOL message Send Marc_a_b a Private Message
Anouncement from the AU, the supreme court has rulled against the display of the 10 commandments, even when disguised with other 'historic' documents.

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 02/25/2002 :  14:59:12   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message
A welcome ray of light.

f

"Don't tell me your doubts; I've got enough doubts of my own. Tell me something you BELIEVE in!"
Brother Dave Gardner
Go to Top of Page

Randy
SFN Regular

USA
1990 Posts

Posted - 02/25/2002 :  16:33:54   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Randy a Private Message
Fantastic! I've been spreading this good news around.

Here, on the Texas state capital grounds is a granite monument with the ten condiments engraved on it. Hope to see it drop-kicked out to oblivion someday soon, but doubt it will happen soon. Our governor has seen fit to spit on our country's separation of church and state. He insists on making school prayer THE major gubernatorial campaign issue inspite of health issues, educational issues, unemployment issues, pollution, etc. The guy is just grandstanding.

Randy


Go to Top of Page

Marc_a_b
Skeptic Friend

USA
142 Posts

Posted - 02/25/2002 :  17:20:49   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Marc_a_b an AOL message Send Marc_a_b a Private Message
And to celebrate the occation, the REAL 10 Commandments

Go to Top of Page

Archistrategos
New Member

28 Posts

Posted - 02/25/2002 :  21:02:06   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Archistrategos a Private Message
Yea! Solon rules! Number 7 is great, is my #1 choice.

And that cool announcement, it was about time!
Feels good, not everything is lost.

Go to Top of Page

Lisa
SFN Regular

USA
1223 Posts

Posted - 02/25/2002 :  21:23:14   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Lisa a Private Message
From what I hear, this is still very much up in the air. Don't get too excited.
Lisa


If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room.
Go to Top of Page

PhDreamer
SFN Regular

USA
925 Posts

Posted - 02/26/2002 :  07:01:05   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit PhDreamer's Homepage Send PhDreamer a Private Message
I read in the local paper this morning that the SCOTUS is not going to take any of the pending 10 Commandments cases. Enough facts, I think this court is a bunch of chicken shits in this case, save for John Paul Stevens apparently. They are acting like the state statutes already cover this stuff, which they don't (except Florida, Kentucky and a couple others), or like there's already plenty of case law, which there isn't. Alabama, which has some statutory limitations already in place, can't even keep Roy Moore from dragging 5000 lb monuments into the courthouse in the middle of the night. This is a complete debacle already and it's only going to get worse.


Laws of Thermodynamics:
1. You cannot win.
2. You cannot break even.
3. You cannot stop playing the game.
Go to Top of Page

Tokyodreamer
SFN Regular

USA
1447 Posts

Posted - 02/26/2002 :  16:51:23   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Tokyodreamer a Private Message
Am I wrong in thinking that the SCOTUS has just refused to look at these cases? Doesn't that mean they are in essence saying "You States figure it out amongst yourselves."

What would the SCOTUS use to judge these cases anyway? The 1st Amendment only applies to Congress, not the states, right? What rule of law could they envoke to tell the states what they can and can't display in regards to these matters?

------------

Sum Ergo Cogito
Go to Top of Page

PhDreamer
SFN Regular

USA
925 Posts

Posted - 02/26/2002 :  22:19:10   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit PhDreamer's Homepage Send PhDreamer a Private Message
quote:

Am I wrong in thinking that the SCOTUS has just refused to look at these cases? Doesn't that mean they are in essence saying "You States figure it out amongst yourselves."


No, you're quite right.

quote:

What would the SCOTUS use to judge these cases anyway? The 1st Amendment only applies to Congress, not the states, right? What rule of law could they envoke to tell the states what they can and can't display in regards to these matters?



Actually, the 14th Amendment has been used in the past to ensure that the priveleges outlined in the Bill of Rights cannot be usurped by the states. I don't see anything wrong with using it in this case.

I simply cannot find merit in the arguments that:

1) The 10 Commandments are some kind of secular, pervasive, life-affirming strictures.

2) Our statutory/constitutional law is based on the 10 Commandments above any other existing 'legal system.'

Folks, this should be a no-freaking-brainer. Johnnie Cochran couldn't win this one if OJ Simpson and Al Cowlings were on the Court.


Laws of Thermodynamics:
1. You cannot win.
2. You cannot break even.
3. You cannot stop playing the game.
Go to Top of Page

Tokyodreamer
SFN Regular

USA
1447 Posts

Posted - 02/27/2002 :  07:58:40   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Tokyodreamer a Private Message
quote:

Folks, this should be a no-freaking-brainer.


Definitely. "Thou shalt have no other god before me" has no place in a government building, and certainly has nothing to do with our laws. How anyone can argue otherwise is mindboggling.

I was just curious as to what the actual laws and rulings would/could be used in this case. And curious as to why the SCOTUS refusing to see the case should be considered good news.

So a possible ruling could say that hanging the 10 Commandments violates the 14th Amendment, because the 14th can be said to make the 1st Amendment apply to the States, in addition to Congress?

------------

Sum Ergo Cogito

Edited by - tokyodreamer on 02/27/2002 08:02:01
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 02/27/2002 :  08:10:23   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message
Thinking about it, a celebration might be a little permature. No desision puts the question back exactly where it was to start with, no loss, no gain.

It would have been a tough one and I think the Court did indeed wuss out.

f

"Don't tell me your doubts; I've got enough doubts of my own. Tell me something you BELIEVE in!"
Brother Dave Gardner
Go to Top of Page

PhDreamer
SFN Regular

USA
925 Posts

Posted - 02/27/2002 :  13:40:14   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit PhDreamer's Homepage Send PhDreamer a Private Message
quote:

So a possible ruling could say that hanging the 10 Commandments violates the 14th Amendment, because the 14th can be said to make the 1st Amendment apply to the States, in addition to Congress?



Technically, the 14th Amendment guarantees equal protection under federal law that cannot be undermined by state statutes. As you might expect, lots of cases invoke the 14th in spirit, if not in writ. Two of the more famous are Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.


Laws of Thermodynamics:
1. You cannot win.
2. You cannot break even.
3. You cannot stop playing the game.
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.08 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000