Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Politics
 Why is the swine Cheney not in jail....
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 07/25/2009 :  07:04:48  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message  Reply with Quote
.... along with various other Bush era miscreants, including Bush himself?

Link
WASHINGTON — Top Bush administration officials in 2002 debated testing the Constitution by sending American troops into the suburbs of Buffalo to arrest a group of men suspected of plotting with Al Qaeda, according to former administration officials.

Some of the advisers to President George W. Bush, including Vice President Dick Cheney, argued that a president had the power to use the military on domestic soil to sweep up the terrorism suspects, who came to be known as the Lackawanna Six, and declare them enemy combatants.

Mr. Bush ultimately decided against the proposal to use military force.

A decision to dispatch troops into the streets to make arrests has few precedents in American history, as both the Constitution and subsequent laws restrict the military from being used to conduct domestic raids and seize property.

The Fourth Amendment bans “unreasonable” searches and seizures without probable cause. And the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 generally prohibits the military from acting in a law enforcement capacity.

In the discussions, Mr. Cheney and others cited an Oct. 23, 2001, memorandum from the Justice Department that, using a broad interpretation of presidential authority, argued that the domestic use of the military against Al Qaeda would be legal because it served a national security, rather than a law enforcement, purpose.

“The president has ample constitutional and statutory authority to deploy the military against international or foreign terrorists operating within the United States,” the memorandum said.

The memorandum — written by the lawyers John C. Yoo and Robert J. Delahunty — was directed to Alberto R. Gonzales, then the White House counsel, who had asked the department about a president's authority to use the military to combat terrorist activities in the United States.
The Cheney link in the article is of interest as well. I didn't bother to open the Bush link because, well, a dullard is rarely all that interesting to start with.




"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Dude
SFN Die Hard

USA
6891 Posts

Posted - 07/25/2009 :  07:47:52   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Dude a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Of the arguments presented by Cheney, Yoo, et al... this one is not 100% without merit. If there were "enemy combatants" on US soil then the military is an acceptable tool. So when Canadia invades we can use the army to defend ourselves.

The idea that a couple of people, even competent and well trained (which these lakawana 'tards were not), can be declared "enemy combatants" is a real problem for me though. I could go on for a page about why.


Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong.
-- Thomas Jefferson

"god :: the last refuge of a man with no answers and no argument." - G. Carlin

Hope, n.
The handmaiden of desperation; the opiate of despair; the illegible signpost on the road to perdition. ~~ da filth
Go to Top of Page

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 07/25/2009 :  11:47:57   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message  Reply with Quote
The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 was passed essentially to end Reconstruction, and to prevent the Federal Government from using troops to put down the Ku Klux Klan. The Klan was riding wild across the former Confederacy, terrorizing blacks and enforcing Jim Crow. In those days, the Army would have been the only force that could have protected the Constitutional rights of former slaves. Posse Comitatus has an ugly origin.

Thus Posse Comitatus remained one major rallying principle for Segregationists and "States Rights" conservatives almost up until the present. The NeoCons, though, upset this traditional applecart. They are only for States Rights when the issues favor them, and quite willing to use Federal authority to overthrow the Florida presidential election results, or to enforce anti-abortion standards.

Cheney was a complete idiot in wanting to suspend Posse Comitatus just to arrest a handful of terror suspects. There was no practical reason for it. I can only guess that he must have been contemplating putting another arrow into the Executive quiver for later use against the general population.


Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 07/25/2009 :  12:48:37   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by HalfMooner

Cheney was a complete idiot in wanting to suspend Posse Comitatus just to arrest a handful of terror suspects. There was no practical reason for it.
That's what the FBI is for. And BATF and DEA and the Secret Service, depending on what the suspects are doing for money.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.08 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000