Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Astronomy
 Universe expansion
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 4

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 01/26/2011 :  10:03:17   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Well, if we're going to keep at it:
97e – Believe that expansion of the universe is evident without any proof.
This is just re-stating your argument; it's not actually evidence.
Go to Top of Page

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 01/26/2011 :  10:27:17   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message  Reply with Quote
By the way, to have any real discussion of the expansion of the universe, shouldn't you begin by addressing the Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker metric?

The key issues were first published in Friedmann's "Über die Möglichkeit einer Welt mit konstanter negativer Krümmung des Raumes," from Zeitschrift für Physik 21 (1924). I have a PDF of the article, if you'd like it. The English is "On the Possibility of a World with Constant Negative Curvature of Space," and a translation was published in General Relativity and Gravitation 31 (1999). I have a PDF of that, too.

Point is, it's not like these ideas were dreamt up willy-nilly out of thin air. Instead, there are lots of compelling reasons to see this to be true-- reasons borne out of some pretty complex math and difficult-to-understand physics and the like. Moreover, there have been observations that support these ideas.

You obviously have trouble understanding those observations, and that's OK. So do I. But rather than assume that your lack of understanding means that they can't be true, a better approach (and one that will probably help your sanity) is to just try to understand them better. The reality is that if there is a problem with the Standard Model, it's not going to be observed from the likes of you. Go to school to study math and cosmology. Then go to grad school and study more. And then see if your objections hold up. I'm guessing they won't.
Edited by - Cuneiformist on 01/26/2011 10:29:49
Go to Top of Page

lbiar
New Member

20 Posts

Posted - 02/13/2011 :  19:36:01   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit lbiar's Homepage Send lbiar a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Many evidences not give reason, but also not quit.

Big Bang and universe expansion are creationism, belief, magic, sect, gods, ...

More added to before:

1se - There is not any proof of expansion and Big Bang

2se - Draw the geometrical figure like universe expand

3se - Make experimentally an expansion or creation of space from nothing

4se - Many false evidences and proofs, but none experiment consistent

5se - None probability of true, but only a belief, sect or religion

6se - expansion is creationism (expansion is not from compressed)

7se - Already more of 50 years in belief scientific

8se - Expansion is a triple fraud and don't mean compression, means creation.

9se - Universe with expansion visual explain perfectly what we see and measure.

10se - All begin from that seem to expand (time delay, ..)

11se - Resume: impossible expansion and equal in all directions

12se - Hubble's law and distance-speed relation are very perfect to be another thing that an optic effect

13se - All the facts are against expansion

14se - Flat and homogeneous are incompatible with expansion equall in all directions.

15se - Big Bang creationist



27e - Many informations of incredible theories and nothing over visible things

28e - For expansion there are not knows physic laws

29e - What physic law allow expand empty space?

30e - Only an expansion by axis (3d=cubic) can to be flat and homogeneous

31e - How galaxies can sweep a universe in expansion?

32e - Each person has a different idea of expansion and Big Bang

33e - Only can to be an optic effect

34e - Physics cannot admit any form of creation

35e - The only 1 is that can expand visually like say the theory of expansion is an optic effect.

36e - Nothing can to be created or destroyed

37e - Physic facts cannot be against physic laws and mathematics.

38e - The reality is easy and clear according to physic laws that also are easy and clear.

39e - Deuterium from First Three Minutes is incompatible with first atoms in CMBR

40e - Impossible galaxies collision and new stars in present days.

41e - Inflation theory is not a good theory, it's needed for not crash the expansion theory.

42e - The background (CMB) expand near light speed.

43e - Expansion (unknown force) has more power that gravity (know force)

44e - Instantaneous and inexhaustible

45e - Expansion need physic laws unknowns (and/or 28e)

46e - Expansion need to take in count size of galaxies.

47e - A universe in expansion would to be against Hubble's law

48e - Only an optic effect is according to visual expansion and physic laws. (47e, ..)

49e - Why we are not at universe end?

50e - Expansion & Big-Bang can't explain Universe start & end and nothing of nothing

51e - Casual that expand equal in all point and with fossil register

52e - few probably not to see any end of the universe and see all the CMBR (and 49e)

53e - Science must not admit superstition and data without proofs

54e - The theory explain how could pass, but admit impossibles

55e - Angle fault

56e - CMBR temperature

57e - There are many optical effects and are different of what really happens

58e - The expansion need a proof

59e - Expansion and Big Bang theories are near perfect, but impossibles

60e - With actual and registered expansion the universe would be more little

61e - Only is possible a universe without expansion

62e - Universe is physic not philosophic

63e - Expansion and Big Bang are against know physic laws.

64e - From where expand

65e - From where born so much mass-energy without space?

66e - How was created mass, energy, time, first space, ...?

67e - Why brake the inflation?. And Why so much?. And Why now balance with speed and distance of the CMB?

68e - Big Crunch has not relation with escape forces

69e - Error predictions and theories

70e - Deuterium

71e - If Deuterium theory is fake. How much more? (and 39e)

72e - What is the relation between particles physic and Big Bang?: none

73e - If in Big Bang was creation this is magic

74e - What is more impossible that expand or create space and in all directions and places?

75e - Life has begin and end, matter-energy not.

76e - If anything seem impossible and all indicates that really is impossible: Why is evident that exist?

77e - Expansion and Big Bang have nothing logical

78e - What happens when people needed to demonstrate anything is false, but believe in it?

79e - Expansion and Big Bang only obey at magic laws

80e - What happens if the scientific is believer and not skeptical? (and 78e)

81e - Particles physic and expansion have not relation

82e - Science not admit miracles (creation=miracle and magic)

83e - Big Bang is or magic (creation) or it's not the begin and there is a pre-Big Bang

84e - An optic effect is flat

85e - If universe expand only in places without gravity there are problems

86e - If space expand (or create) we need to close the physic and believe in magic and gods.

87e - 1 only mm created (or expanded) need to take place in all the universe or compress the near space

88e - Expansion cannot be at same time anything and opposite

89e - Expansion and Big Bang are impossibles total

90e - Many supposed evidences and proof have not double direction

91e - Astronomers and scientists in general today are sectarian.

92e - The paradoxical of that farthest stars is the maximum we can see in the future

93e - The called expansion is really creation

94e - In compressed space the light and bodies would travel more slowly

95e - Attention, many believers are fanatics

96e - It's easy confuse live with universe

97e - Each person has a different idea over expansion and Big Bang

98e - Our eyes mistake us in daily: Why do you believe don't mistake in far?

99e - Mind so good for UFO would consider today UFO true, evident and with proofs.

100e - If you can create anything from nothing is probably I believe any possibility of expansion of the universe

101e - Expansion in places without gravity and nor in gravity places is incompatible with physic laws

102e - Think in a universe from 0 to all seem ridiculous

103e - if time 0 creates Big Bang how time 13.5 billions years don't create nothing more that space

104e - Expansion and Big Bang need changes in physic laws

105e - Why expand empty space and not expand not empty space?

106e - The universe-nature usually re-use the same figures, but not expansion form.

107e - Homogeneity is a fact, expansion not

108e - Is easy to say that not expand in places with gravity

109e - Why only space expand?

110e - Not seem strange that religions are gratefully with expansion and Big Bang (creationism)

111e - Do you believe that I need to be submitted by believers in expansion?

112e - Any logic person understand that expansion is impossible

113e - Physic laws are the same in space and time, but against expansion theories.

114e - If scientists think evident what is impossible: Where is the limit? How much more things are bad?

115e - Bad day the day that scientists make a sect.

116e - Universities of astronomy can to be another thing that proselytism

117e - for astronomers any strange thing according to expansion is proof and evidence

118e - Science not need gods, but expansion (creation) need theirs.

119e - All scientific believed in expansion don't make it true.

120e - Big Rip and Big Crunch have probabilities less of 1/billion

121e - Bad information and calculus in the CMBR

122e - Expansion theory say galaxies are before stars

123e - All before CMBR according to theory use unknown and changing physic laws

124e - Impossible is impossible even with scientists belief in it.

125e - Why expansion and Big Bang are evidents?

126e - Universe don't need explanation of expansion

127e - Don't exist: black energy, blackbody

128e - The basic origin of expansion and Big Bang are impossible

129e - Expansion is not possible cubic, but also not spherical.

130e - How is the universe

131e - Expansion only in zones without gravity is against Hubble's law

132e - Expansion and Big Bang are creationism theories.

133e - Skeptical religious that accept expansion really are not skeptical: accept creation, and creation is creationism and means magic and gods.

134e - Many believers are pacific, but proselytism and extremist not.

135e - Give by proved and evident the impossible also is a form to not find the true

136e - Physic laws would need to change for adequate to expansion theories.

137e - Inflation is crazy into the crazy

138e - Astronomers thing theories are robust, but really have not sense

139e - Dark energy create space like if electric energy would create cables

140e - Universe without expansion is according to physic laws

141e - A curved universe is not flat

142e - false: "Existence of the blackbody CMB. This shows that the Universe has evolved from a dense, isothermal state"

143e - If not know say don't know, not say expand (create)

144e - Creationism = success for religious

145e - What strange cause admit expansion when tired light and steady state was rejected

146e - If expansion is real by visual, also are real and not only visual: mirages, rainbow, aurora borealis




900e - Big Bang evidence are not evidence

901e - There is no proof over expansion and Big Bang

902e - Only there are proof and evidences anti Big Bang and anti expansion

903e - All have errors

904e - Expansion and Big Bang are unsustainable

905e - Facts bad interpreted and bad understand

906e - I don't use magic, not anti physic laws, ...

907e - Each people believe a thing different over expansion and Big Bang

908e - Any strange theory supported by big brains can seem good

909e - That scientific believe in expansion not means it's true

All in my page : http://bigbangno.wordpress.com/

Go to Top of Page

lbiar
New Member

20 Posts

Posted - 02/13/2011 :  19:39:01   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit lbiar's Homepage Send lbiar a Private Message  Reply with Quote
What means an religious skeptik that believe in creation of space (bad so called expansion of space), in creation of all (Big Bang).

So religious skeptik but believe in creationism: Who create it?: magic, gods, God.
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 02/13/2011 :  20:15:42   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by lbiar

Many evidences not give reason, but also not quit.

Big Bang and universe expansion are creationism, belief, magic, sect, gods, ...

More added to before:

1se - There is not any proof of expansion and Big Bang
Anyone who asks for "proof" from science is obviously out of touch with reality and need not be taken seriously.
2se - Draw the geometrical figure like universe expand
That's funny.
3se - Make experimentally an expansion or creation of space from nothing
That's even funnier.
4se - Many false evidences and proofs, but none experiment consistent
This is just you displaying your ignorance of what it means to "experiment" in the field of cosmology.

Skipping ahead...
144e - Creationism = success for religious
This is just dumb.
145e - What strange cause admit expansion when tired light and steady state was rejected
The evidence did.

Skip...
909e - That scientific believe in expansion not means it's true
Doesn't mean it's false, either.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 4 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.09 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000