Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Community Forums
 General Discussion
 Morality — objective, subjective, or what?
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

Hawks
SFN Regular

Canada
1383 Posts

Posted - 03/24/2011 :  03:50:29   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Hawks's Homepage Send Hawks a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by AyameTan

I look at it this way: suffering and happiness are objectively good and bad by definition.

Remove "objectively" from the above sentence and reverse the order in which "good" and "bad" are written and you have a definition I think a lot of people would agree with.

METHINKS IT IS LIKE A WEASEL
It's a small, off-duty czechoslovakian traffic warden!
Go to Top of Page

AyameTan
New Member

Japan
36 Posts

Posted - 03/24/2011 :  22:32:59   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send AyameTan a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Hawks

Originally posted by AyameTan

I look at it this way: suffering and happiness are objectively good and bad by definition.

Remove "objectively" from the above sentence and reverse the order in which "good" and "bad" are written and you have a definition I think a lot of people would agree with.


I don't disagree that some sociopathic individuals (WLC, Zacharias et al) disagree with suffering being objectively bad.

The fact that suffering can lead to a greater good doesn't change this.

"Tatti hitori no inochi wo sukuu mono wa zensekai wo sukuu."
Go to Top of Page

Hawks
SFN Regular

Canada
1383 Posts

Posted - 03/25/2011 :  10:15:57   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Hawks's Homepage Send Hawks a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by AyameTan
I don't disagree that some sociopathic individuals (WLC, Zacharias et al) disagree with suffering being objectively bad.

The fact that suffering can lead to a greater good doesn't change this.

Once upon a time, people used the bible to justify keeping and beating slaves. It's fair to say that said slaves suffered and that the people who kept the slaves justified their actions by claiming that they were followers of an objective morality - one that is different from the one you claim is objective.

METHINKS IT IS LIKE A WEASEL
It's a small, off-duty czechoslovakian traffic warden!
Go to Top of Page

Baxter
Skeptic Friend

USA
131 Posts

Posted - 03/30/2011 :  07:18:55   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Baxter a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Just because people disagree on something doesn't mean it is subjective.

"We tend to scoff at the beliefs of the ancients. But we can't scoff at them personally, to their faces, and this is what annoys me." ~from Deep Thoughts by Jack Handey

"We can be as honest as we are ignorant. If we are, when asked what is beyond the horizon of the known, we must say that we do not know." ~Robert G. Ingersoll
Go to Top of Page

Dude
SFN Die Hard

USA
6891 Posts

Posted - 03/30/2011 :  07:31:36   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Dude a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by AyameTan

I look at it this way: suffering and happiness are objectively good and bad by definition.

Therefore, any sensible form of morality needs to take this into account.

More specifically, I believe in a modified utilitarian philosophy that allows us to respect autonomy while pursuing human and animal happiness.

And word definitions/usages change over time, especially those used for nebulous concepts like morality, rendering morality self evidently subjective. Good point Ayame!


Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong.
-- Thomas Jefferson

"god :: the last refuge of a man with no answers and no argument." - G. Carlin

Hope, n.
The handmaiden of desperation; the opiate of despair; the illegible signpost on the road to perdition. ~~ da filth
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.08 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000