Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Religion
 Religious indoctrination of children child abuse?
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 7

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 08/01/2011 :  14:42:51   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by alienist

Emotionally, people need religion (I am not saying it is right). Death is scary and life can be fuckin' difficult. Believing in a god or heaven can alleviate fears of death, fears of being insignificant, of being alone, etc. It takes a lot of emotional strength to not believe in god or an afterlife. Parents, of course, influence their children's beliefs and view of the world.

So to say all religion is bad or is child abuse is ignoring the reality of humans' weaknesses and needs. Compartmentalizing is probably the best strategy to deal with the scientific world and dealing with an indifferent universe.
No, if religion is being used as a crutch by people who can't handle reality, then they need therapy, not enabling. Would you say similar things about alcoholics, and suggest that they need coddling instead of treatment?
Religion can bring a lot of problems, but that is because it reflects human behavior (aggression, us vs them beliefs, and often male dominance). Fortunately, we have also evolved to be charitable, rational and accepting.
Of course, faith is not required for us to be charitable, rational or accepting.
Fortunately, I do think the world is gradually moving away from religion being in control of all aspects of life. Religion is becoming less influential in a lot of ways, which of course scares the fundamentalists to death
This seems to be contradictory to "Emotionally, people need religion..."

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Hal
Skeptic Friend

USA
302 Posts

Posted - 08/02/2011 :  05:53:10   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Hal a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dave W.

[quote]Originally posted by alienist

Of course, faith is not required for us to be charitable, rational or accepting.


True, that.


Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
Martin Luther King Jr.

Go to Top of Page

alienist
Skeptic Friend

USA
210 Posts

Posted - 08/02/2011 :  14:39:50   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send alienist a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I agree with you, Dave, on a lot of your points. What I object to is making the issue so black and white. I think a lot of religious thought is harmful. But then there are people who believe god exists, but go on with their daily lives without thinking of god or needing to think of god. It makes them irrational in that area but harmless overall. So at what point does religious belief become harmful. And what would you define as harmful. Humans are definitely not rational all the time.

In terms of people needing religion less: it is probably due to life being somewhat easier esp in the developed world. People aren't dying from infection or contaminated water, etc. So people need religion less than in the past. This is of course speculation on my part.

The only normal people are the ones you don't know very well! - Joe Ancis
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 08/02/2011 :  15:09:04   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by alienist

I agree with you, Dave, on a lot of your points. What I object to is making the issue so black and white. I think a lot of religious thought is harmful. But then there are people who believe god exists, but go on with their daily lives without thinking of god or needing to think of god. It makes them irrational in that area but harmless overall. So at what point does religious belief become harmful. And what would you define as harmful.
Someone who believes that God exists but never does anything based on that belief or spends time thinking about it may as well not believe that God exists. A belief from which nothing is produced is as good as not having that belief, for all practical purposes (did I mention I'm also a utilitarian?).

On the other hand, even beliefs which are moot take up neural "space" and resources. Some amount of the world's food and water get used up, each year, by seemingly innocuous beliefs. Okay, that's stretching it.
Humans are definitely not rational all the time.
No, they're not. I don't have a problem with temporary irrationality. I have a problem with people who think that irrationality is a good thing. I have a much more serious problem with institutions (like most major religions) which have, as a high-priority goal, the purposeful spread of irrationality.
In terms of people needing religion less: it is probably due to life being somewhat easier esp in the developed world. People aren't dying from infection or contaminated water, etc. So people need religion less than in the past. This is of course speculation on my part.
A recent study demonstrated that religiousity is caused by social inequity. The smaller the gap between the rich and poor in a country, the fewer people will cling to religion (counter-intuitively, both rich and poor people get more religious when the gap between them is wider).

I'll re-find the details of that study later. Remind me if I don't post 'em sometime soon.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 08/03/2011 :  12:16:44   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
As promised.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 7 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.13 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000