Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Politics
 The National Defense Authorization Act
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

perrodetokio
Skeptic Friend

275 Posts

Posted - 12/06/2011 :  20:26:39  Show Profile Send perrodetokio a Private Message  Reply with Quote
If Obama does one thing for the remainder of his presidency let it be a veto of the National Defense Authorization Act – a law recently passed by the Senate currently which would place domestic terror investigations and interrogations into the hands of the military and which would open the door for trial-free, indefinite detention of anyone, including American citizens, so long as the government calls them terrorists.


http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2011/12/05/the-national-defense-authorization-act-is-the-greatest-threat-to-civil-liberties-americans-face/

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/12/01/the-truth-about-the-national-defense-authorization-act/

(and everywhere else in the internet)

To me this looks scary as hell. Maybe I donīt fully understand it. It looks as it could be used to silence anyone. To cover-up anything.

What do you think about it?

In England, Scotland Yard passed an announcement labelling the Occupy movement "terrorists".

Anyone being label as such in the US and this law could apply to them.

Any thoughts?

"Yes I have a belief in a creator/God but do not know that he exists." Bill Scott

"They are still mosquitoes! They did not turn into whales or lizards or anything else. They are still mosquitoes!..." Bill Scott

"We should have millions of missing links or transition fossils showing a fish turning into a philosopher..." Bill Scott

chefcrsh
Skeptic Friend

Hong Kong
380 Posts

Posted - 12/06/2011 :  20:57:58   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send chefcrsh a Private Message  Reply with Quote
You are not alone.

http://youtu.be/rN-6Bmw_UIA
Go to Top of Page

moakley
SFN Regular

USA
1888 Posts

Posted - 12/07/2011 :  07:12:41   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send moakley a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by perrodetokio

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/12/01/the-truth-about-the-national-defense-authorization-act/

(and everywhere else in the internet)

To me this looks scary as hell.
Scary as hell seems to be the goal of the second link. NDA Act and the kitchen sink. I couldn't finish it.

Life is good

Philosophy is questions that may never be answered. Religion is answers that may never be questioned. -Anonymous
Go to Top of Page

Dr. Mabuse
Septic Fiend

Sweden
9688 Posts

Posted - 12/07/2011 :  07:51:01   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Dr. Mabuse an ICQ Message Send Dr. Mabuse a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Isn't NDAA in violation with the Posse Comitatus Act?

Dr. Mabuse - "When the going gets tough, the tough get Duct-tape..."
Dr. Mabuse whisper.mp3

"Equivocation is not just a job, for a creationist it's a way of life..." Dr. Mabuse

Support American Troops in Iraq:
Send them unarmed civilians for target practice..
Collateralmurder.
Go to Top of Page

Kil
Evil Skeptic

USA
13477 Posts

Posted - 12/07/2011 :  08:31:15   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Kil's Homepage  Send Kil an AOL message  Send Kil a Yahoo! Message Send Kil a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dr. Mabuse

Isn't NDAA in violation with the Posse Comitatus Act?
Not the way I read this:

The Posse Comitatus Act

The Posse Comitatus Act is the United States federal law (18 U.S.C. § 1385) that was passed on June 18, 1878, after the end of Reconstruction. Its intent (in concert with the Insurrection Act of 1807) was to limit the powers of local governments and law enforcement agencies from using federal military personnel to enforce the laws of the land. Contrary to popular belief, the Act does not prohibit members of the Army from exercising state law enforcement, police, or peace officer powers that maintain "law and order"; it simply requires that any orders to do so must originate with the United States Constitution or Act of Congress.


But yikes! I hope Obama sends it back for that fix once it hits his desk. As I understand it, he's not for it. But as part of the bigger bill, I'm not sure what he can do about it.

Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.

Why not question something for a change?

Genetic Literacy Project
Go to Top of Page

Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie

USA
4826 Posts

Posted - 12/07/2011 :  14:43:04   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Valiant Dancer's Homepage Send Valiant Dancer a Private Message  Reply with Quote
This is S 1867. It is a whopping 682 pages and I really doubt any of the lickspittle toadies...... I mean Congresscritters actually read this bill. It reads like it was thrown together haphazardly.

For instance, in Section 551 of the bill, one could understand the removal of the sodomy statute (UCMJ Article 125) considering the push to decriminalize homosexuality in the armed forces. However, Article 125 is itself poorly written and combines sodomy with beastiality.

The language is mind numbingly political lawyerese.

This is a political grenade. If the President vetoes it, funding for the military ends at the end of the fiscal year (in a couple of weeks). He then can be labled anti-military.

This one is some of the worst wording of legislation I have seen in a great while.

Here is the text of the entire bill.

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112s1867pcs/pdf/BILLS-112s1867pcs.pdf


Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils

Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 12/07/2011 :  19:12:36   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Valiant Dancer

This is a political grenade. If the President vetoes it, funding for the military ends at the end of the fiscal year (in a couple of weeks).
Federal fiscal year 2012 ends on September 30, 2012.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie

USA
4826 Posts

Posted - 12/07/2011 :  21:32:42   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Valiant Dancer's Homepage Send Valiant Dancer a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dave W.

Originally posted by Valiant Dancer

This is a political grenade. If the President vetoes it, funding for the military ends at the end of the fiscal year (in a couple of weeks).
Federal fiscal year 2012 ends on September 30, 2012.


Sorry.

The funding would run out by the first of the year. The military has been running on a series of emergency funding bills since they still can't pass a damn budget.

Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils

Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.06 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000