Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Creation/Evolution
 The Missing Universe Museum
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 6

Kil
Evil Skeptic

USA
13477 Posts

Posted - 02/27/2012 :  13:22:03   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Kil's Homepage  Send Kil an AOL message  Send Kil a Yahoo! Message Send Kil a Private Message  Reply with Quote
justintime:
About the cherry picking. Those were your sources. Some canceled each other out because of their speculative nature.

That was the point. There is a debate going on. The only one doing any cherry picking around here is you. You found what you wanted in one of my links and disregarded the point I was making.

But then, you're the troll. So why expect more from you?

Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.

Why not question something for a change?

Genetic Literacy Project
Go to Top of Page

jamalrapper
Sockpuppet

213 Posts

Posted - 02/27/2012 :  14:19:22   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send jamalrapper a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Kil

justintime:
About the cherry picking. Those were your sources. Some canceled each other out because of their speculative nature.

That was the point. There is a debate going on. The only one doing any cherry picking around here is you. You found what you wanted in one of my links and disregarded the point I was making.

But then, you're the troll. So why expect more from you?


Why do you post links you have not read or agree with. It creates the impression you are open about what you read in them. One cannot use all three position when they contradict each other. That is why evolution is so screwed up.

They are trying to fit every possible scenario so there is an answer for every level of inquiry. You want monkey believers their is a chapter for you. You want a lost and found chromosome section there is one for you. You want smart chimps and dumb humans there is some evidence there too. You want interspecies breeding got that covered to.

A few million years should matter to everyone. Even you are not the same person you were just 10 years ago.
Go to Top of Page

Kil
Evil Skeptic

USA
13477 Posts

Posted - 02/27/2012 :  14:28:51   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Kil's Homepage  Send Kil an AOL message  Send Kil a Yahoo! Message Send Kil a Private Message  Reply with Quote
justintime:
Why do you post links you have not read or agree with.

I did read them. As for posting something I don't agree with, that would be a foreign concept to you, wouldn't it? I was attempting to show you that a debate is going on. It's how science is done. It doesn't matter in that context whether I agree with the article. In fact, it's a demonstration of my fairness. Something you always seem surprised about when you notice it, but never understand it. It's not in your DNA.


Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.

Why not question something for a change?

Genetic Literacy Project
Go to Top of Page

jamalrapper
Sockpuppet

213 Posts

Posted - 02/27/2012 :  14:41:07   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send jamalrapper a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Kil

justintime:
Why do you post links you have not read or agree with.

I did read them. As for posting something I don't agree with, that would be a foreign concept to you, wouldn't it? I was attempting to show you that a debate is going on. It's how science is done. It doesn't matter in that context whether I agree with the article. In fact, it's a demonstration of my fairness. Something you always seem surprised about when you notice it, but never understand it. It's not in your DNA.




Actually it demonstrates your indecisiveness. You could have posted the one that was closest to your understanding. Throwing all three with dates varying from 4 to 8 million years. Does not say there is a debate between them. They were independent studies. What it does show is how inaccurate science is dating things.
You gave 3 scenarios. I picked one of them because I could not pick all three (their results contradict each other). And you call that cherry picking.
Go to Top of Page

Kil
Evil Skeptic

USA
13477 Posts

Posted - 02/27/2012 :  14:48:58   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Kil's Homepage  Send Kil an AOL message  Send Kil a Yahoo! Message Send Kil a Private Message  Reply with Quote
justintime:
Actually it demonstrates your indecisiveness.

So I point out that there is a debate about dates going on and post three links to demonstrate it, and that makes me indecisive? Can your logic be anymore tortured than that? Or did you just need to get an insult in because it's been a while?

Go fuck yourself. I'm done with you. Troll.

Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.

Why not question something for a change?

Genetic Literacy Project
Go to Top of Page

jamalrapper
Sockpuppet

213 Posts

Posted - 02/27/2012 :  15:16:57   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send jamalrapper a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Kil

justintime:
Actually it demonstrates your indecisiveness.

So I point out that there is a debate about dates going on and post three links to demonstrate it, and that makes me indecisive? Can your logic be anymore tortured than that? Or did you just need to get an insult in because it's been a while?

Go fuck yourself. I'm done with you. Troll.


Sorry Kil but you are wrong about me. I am not a master baiter.

If I gave you three choices and you picked one. I would have to go with your decision because it was like saying Kil..pick one. Then I turn around and challenge you for the one you picked by saying you were cherry picking. Then you should not have offered those choices which you did not agree with. You should have just given me what either supported or challenged the position on the table.

I appreciate you offering more choices and showing me the confusion in time stamping events in evolutionary science. But I did criticized that. It is not science even when they use DNA test.

But you have to understand your links are not the only one I researched. I even gave you credit when your last link just smacked fitted for my unified theory. I have a few of his papers but they are too brief.

Thanks anyway....banish me...if it is so painful.
Edited by - jamalrapper on 02/27/2012 15:32:15
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 6 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.12 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000