Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Health
 "First genetically modified" babies born
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Machi4velli
SFN Regular

USA
854 Posts

Posted - 06/29/2012 :  22:22:33  Show Profile Send Machi4velli a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I saw a trending article about the "first genetically modified" babies being born from the Daily News this week (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-43767/Worlds-GM-babies-born.html) -- several blogs mentioning it, but that's the only source I could find, which made me doubt the story.

However, on one website someone linked this story at CNN:
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/TECH/science/05/05/US.genes/

The same scientist, same institution, even some of the same numbers are here. As far as I understand (which is very little), the science seems the same as well -- but, from 2001:

Cohen wrote in the British journal Human Reproduction that this was the "first case of human germline genetic modification resulting in normal health children."


Here's an excerpt from the 2012 story:

Writing in the journal Human Reproduction, the researchers, led by fertility pioneer Professor Jacques Cohen, say that this 'is the first case of human germline genetic modification resulting in normal healthy children'.


So, what's going on here? The Daily Mail story isn't dated, so I can't tell if it's just a case of social network/reddit necromancy, or something more?

"Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people."
-Giordano Bruno

"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, but the illusion of knowledge."
-Stephen Hawking

"Seeking what is true is not seeking what is desirable"
-Albert Camus

Edited by - Machi4velli on 06/29/2012 22:24:57

Machi4velli
SFN Regular

USA
854 Posts

Posted - 06/29/2012 :  22:27:17   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Machi4velli a Private Message  Reply with Quote
This place dates it as June 27 -- wonder how they got a date?

http://www.trueactivist.com/worlds-first-genetically-modified-babies-created-in-us/

"Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people."
-Giordano Bruno

"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, but the illusion of knowledge."
-Stephen Hawking

"Seeking what is true is not seeking what is desirable"
-Albert Camus
Go to Top of Page

Machi4velli
SFN Regular

USA
854 Posts

Posted - 06/29/2012 :  22:39:59   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Machi4velli a Private Message  Reply with Quote
That one links to this one: http://naturalsociety.com/worlds-first-genetically-modified-babies-created-in-us/

Which links the Daily Mail but seems to have pulled the date out of no where.

Turns out if you search for the story on the Daily Mail, you get a 2001 date:

Source

Bloggers making up dates I see...

Edited to fix overly long link that was messing up the page view in the thread.

Kil

"Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people."
-Giordano Bruno

"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, but the illusion of knowledge."
-Stephen Hawking

"Seeking what is true is not seeking what is desirable"
-Albert Camus
Go to Top of Page

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 06/29/2012 :  22:59:28   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I, for one, welcome our 11-year-old GM overlords.

Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 06/30/2012 :  06:22:04   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
If you view the HTML source code of the original article, you can find this line in the headers:
meta property="article:modified_time" content="2001-05-05 13:51:56 UTC"
The research article that the news article was based on is Cytoplasmic transfer in assisted reproduction. Haven't read it all yet, myself.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Kil
Evil Skeptic

USA
13477 Posts

Posted - 06/30/2012 :  10:40:45   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Kil's Homepage  Send Kil an AOL message  Send Kil a Yahoo! Message Send Kil a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I wouldn't hit a dog in the ass with the Daily Mail:

Forget global warming - it's Cycle 25 we need to worry about (and if NASA scientists are right the Thames will be freezing over again)

Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.

Why not question something for a change?

Genetic Literacy Project
Go to Top of Page

Machi4velli
SFN Regular

USA
854 Posts

Posted - 06/30/2012 :  13:55:56   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Machi4velli a Private Message  Reply with Quote
To be fair, the Daily Mail didn't do anything wrong here (beyond possibly plagiarism, but that's beside the point), just the websites referencing it.

"Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people."
-Giordano Bruno

"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, but the illusion of knowledge."
-Stephen Hawking

"Seeking what is true is not seeking what is desirable"
-Albert Camus
Go to Top of Page

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 07/01/2012 :  01:15:21   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Machi4velli

To be fair, the Daily Mail didn't do anything wrong here (beyond possibly plagiarism, but that's beside the point), just the websites referencing it.
I know it's the Silly Season, but even so, writer Michael Hanlon must be held responsible for either deliberately distorting the news, or being unprofessionally negligent in researching it. And for plagiarism. He's presumably a science reporter, after all. But the blame really goes all the way to the top, with how The Mail does atrocious journalism.

You folks here got to the bottom of the matter, after all. And you weren't even paid to do so.

Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Edited by - HalfMooner on 07/01/2012 01:16:25
Go to Top of Page

Machi4velli
SFN Regular

USA
854 Posts

Posted - 07/01/2012 :  10:49:06   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Machi4velli a Private Message  Reply with Quote
What was distorted or wrong here? It seemed to essentially match the CNN article. The only distortion was websites picking the story up and making up a current date for it that the Daily Mail didn't claim.

"Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people."
-Giordano Bruno

"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, but the illusion of knowledge."
-Stephen Hawking

"Seeking what is true is not seeking what is desirable"
-Albert Camus
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 07/01/2012 :  10:57:34   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Machi4velli

To be fair, the Daily Mail didn't do anything wrong here...
And run-of-the-mill poor science reporting. To a casual reader, the piece is going to suggest that scientists modified particular genes to get the desired result, when what really happened was that the scientists sucked some of the fluid out of a healthy cell and injected it (and everything it contains) into the egg of a woman who was having trouble conceiving. This wasn't a tinkering-with-base-pairs sort of genetic modification, it was hit-or-miss, at best.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 07/01/2012 :  11:07:21   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Machi4velli

What was distorted or wrong here? It seemed to essentially match the CNN article. The only distortion was websites picking the story up and making up a current date for it that the Daily Mail didn't claim.
My error. I had that backwards in my mind. Never mind.

Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Go to Top of Page

vikashmunda
New Member

2 Posts

Posted - 07/08/2012 :  00:44:55   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send vikashmunda a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I don't thing dailymail is doing anything wrong here every news website refers news from the other source too.

thecuezone.com | best pool table brands |
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.09 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000