Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Religion
 Atheism Period
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 7

H. Humbert
SFN Die Hard

USA
4574 Posts

Posted - 10/24/2012 :  22:24:20   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send H. Humbert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dave W.

Originally posted by HalfMooner

(Nobody ever really wins an argument with Dave W., anyway. Dave wears down his opposition with both quality and quantity...
That's not true. Ask H. Humbert.
It's not true. There's often very little quality.

I keed! I usually find myself agreeing with Dave W., so refresh my memory. I can't recall a specific instance.

"A man is his own easiest dupe, for what he wishes to be true he generally believes to be true." --Demosthenes

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool." --Richard P. Feynman

"Face facts with dignity." --found inside a fortune cookie
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 10/24/2012 :  23:02:42   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by H. Humbert

I usually find myself agreeing with Dave W., so refresh my memory. I can't recall a specific instance.
I'm remembering the time I was trying my damndest to defend free will against determinism. If I remember correctly (and that's questionable, of course), you were one of the primary reasons I ditched my last hopes of not being a billiard ball.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

H. Humbert
SFN Die Hard

USA
4574 Posts

Posted - 10/25/2012 :  00:28:33   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send H. Humbert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dave W.

Originally posted by H. Humbert

I usually find myself agreeing with Dave W., so refresh my memory. I can't recall a specific instance.
I'm remembering the time I was trying my damndest to defend free will against determinism. If I remember correctly (and that's questionable, of course), you were one of the primary reasons I ditched my last hopes of not being a billiard ball.
It's funny you say that, because I'm not sure I am a determinist. The whole free will discussion is something I keep meaning to bring up when I have the time. I have a lot of thoughts of been mulling over for awhile.


"A man is his own easiest dupe, for what he wishes to be true he generally believes to be true." --Demosthenes

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool." --Richard P. Feynman

"Face facts with dignity." --found inside a fortune cookie
Go to Top of Page

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 10/25/2012 :  04:34:43   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message  Reply with Quote
My slogan: "Atheism Period: Less [ful]filling."

Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Go to Top of Page

Hal
Skeptic Friend

USA
302 Posts

Posted - 10/25/2012 :  05:08:00   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Hal a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Centuries upon centuries of people fighting over what kind of deists we should be; enough to convince me to write it all off as self-evident nonsense. And now we get to argue over atheistic denominations. Huzzah!
Go to Top of Page

Kil
Evil Skeptic

USA
13477 Posts

Posted - 10/25/2012 :  08:03:59   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Kil's Homepage  Send Kil an AOL message  Send Kil a Yahoo! Message Send Kil a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by HalfMooner

My slogan: "Atheism Period: Less [ful]filling."

Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.

Why not question something for a change?

Genetic Literacy Project
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 10/25/2012 :  10:05:19   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by H. Humbert

It's funny you say that, because I'm not sure I am a determinist. The whole free will discussion is something I keep meaning to bring up when I have the time. I have a lot of thoughts of been mulling over for awhile.
A trip down memory lane shows it was dv82matt and bloody_peasant who changed my mind. You were involved in that thread, but in favor of free will.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

AnthroGeek
New Member

USA
38 Posts

Posted - 10/25/2012 :  11:54:30   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send AnthroGeek a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I don't see A+ covering anything that a label of "progressive atheist" would not cover other than adding confusion. Dave mentioned that the term should be like "wristwatch", in that the compound of the word clearly denotes a difference between the words "wrist" and "watch". I do not see how the word "plus" says anything clearly, much less so the adopted symbol of A+ which seems to carry the liked pretentious assertion of "brights" - whether intended of not.

I just do not see the need for the label. Hell, I don't even see atheism as a movement; much less that of one that swells forth in waves. Then again, I am oft clueless and wrong-minded on many things.

A series of fun one-liners about various pseudoscientific claims and, even better, a concise description of the scientific method - Ken Feder on Skeptic Friends Network from "Frauds, Myths and Mysteries"
Go to Top of Page

Hal
Skeptic Friend

USA
302 Posts

Posted - 10/25/2012 :  12:01:21   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Hal a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by AnthroGeek

I don't see A+ covering anything that a label of "progressive atheist" would not cover other than adding confusion. Dave mentioned that the term should be like "wristwatch", in that the compound of the word clearly denotes a difference between the words "wrist" and "watch". I do not see how the word "plus" says anything clearly, much less so the adopted symbol of A+ which seems to carry the liked pretentious assertion of "brights" - whether intended of not.

I just do not see the need for the label. Hell, I don't even see atheism as a movement; much less that of one that swells forth in waves. Then again, I am oft clueless and wrong-minded on many things.



Who knew that not believing in something required so much effort?
Go to Top of Page

AnthroGeek
New Member

USA
38 Posts

Posted - 10/25/2012 :  12:15:51   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send AnthroGeek a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Hal

Originally posted by AnthroGeek
"said some stuff"


Who knew that not believing in something required so much effort?




I just think the people at FtB and the others who wish to use the term "atheist plus" are more political than atheist. One does have to be atheist to understand that fellow humans should be treated with respect and that society should give ample opportunity and reward to all.

They have so much on their plate - much to which I agree on - that atheism, while in the name, takes the back seat to other issues. It come more off more to me as politics plus atheism than atheism plus politics.


Why not "Humanism Plus"? "H+" woulds even look good on a T-shirt or beer mug.

A series of fun one-liners about various pseudoscientific claims and, even better, a concise description of the scientific method - Ken Feder on Skeptic Friends Network from "Frauds, Myths and Mysteries"
Go to Top of Page

ThorGoLucky
Snuggle Wolf

USA
1487 Posts

Posted - 10/25/2012 :  13:59:12   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit ThorGoLucky's Homepage Send ThorGoLucky a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I like the A+ thing and put it on my website http://thorgolucky.com along side the original A. To me, A+ is skeptical atheism and social justice. I prefer the A+ moniker over humanism.

Originally posted by AnthroGeek

Why not "Humanism Plus"? "H+" woulds even look good on a T-shirt or beer mug.

It would be confused with a hydrogen ion.
Edited by - ThorGoLucky on 10/25/2012 14:00:54
Go to Top of Page

AnthroGeek
New Member

USA
38 Posts

Posted - 10/25/2012 :  14:24:46   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send AnthroGeek a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by ThorGoLucky

I like the A+ thing and put it on my website http://thorgolucky.com along side the original A. To me, A+ is skeptical atheism and social justice. I prefer the A+ moniker over humanism.

Originally posted by AnthroGeek

Why not "Humanism Plus"? "H+" woulds even look good on a T-shirt or beer mug.

It would be confused with a hydrogen ion.



I am personally into wanking plus - its a lot like regular masturbation, but I care about others while I do it.
W+: wanking for a cause.

A series of fun one-liners about various pseudoscientific claims and, even better, a concise description of the scientific method - Ken Feder on Skeptic Friends Network from "Frauds, Myths and Mysteries"
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 10/25/2012 :  14:27:12   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by AnthroGeek

Why not "Humanism Plus"?
Some of us prefer to avoid the label "humanist."
It come more off more to me as politics plus atheism than atheism plus politics.
As explained above, the idea is that atheism serves as the basis for the need for social justice activism, not the other way around. Yes, most A+ers are focused on the politics, but it's the atheism that provides the motivation.
Hell, I don't even see atheism as a movement; much less that of one that swells forth in waves.
Movement atheism is the fight for "I'm an atheist" to be met with indifference instead of indignation.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

AnthroGeek
New Member

USA
38 Posts

Posted - 10/25/2012 :  14:33:03   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send AnthroGeek a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dave W.

Originally posted by AnthroGeek

Why not "Humanism Plus"?
Some of us prefer to avoid the label "humanist."
It come more off more to me as politics plus atheism than atheism plus politics.
As explained above, the idea is that atheism serves as the basis for the need for social justice activism, not the other way around. Yes, most A+ers are focused on the politics, but it's the atheism that provides the motivation.
Hell, I don't even see atheism as a movement; much less that of one that swells forth in waves.
Movement atheism is the fight for "I'm an atheist" to be met with indifference instead of indignation.


I really don't disagree. I believe self identity is very important with regards to self or a movement.

People are free to label themselves as they see fit. In fact, I think it is very important to do so.

I just do see the label as explaining anything new or clearing up misconceptions about what a skeptic or atheist is.

A series of fun one-liners about various pseudoscientific claims and, even better, a concise description of the scientific method - Ken Feder on Skeptic Friends Network from "Frauds, Myths and Mysteries"
Go to Top of Page

AnthroGeek
New Member

USA
38 Posts

Posted - 10/25/2012 :  14:45:39   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send AnthroGeek a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dave W.

Originally posted by AnthroGeek

Why not "Humanism Plus"?
Some of us prefer to avoid the label "humanist."
It come more off more to me as politics plus atheism than atheism plus politics.
As explained above, the idea is that atheism serves as the basis for the need for social justice activism, not the other way around. Yes, most A+ers are focused on the politics, but it's the atheism that provides the motivation.
Hell, I don't even see atheism as a movement; much less that of one that swells forth in waves.
Movement atheism is the fight for "I'm an atheist" to be met with indifference instead of indignation.



I also do not believe that treating people as an equal is any more rooted in atheism than theism.

If PZ got bopped on the head tomorrow and just believed in some teleological argument for a god; he wouldn't suddenly say that women should be in the kitchen making sandwiches and gays should burn in hell.
If you want to label yourself as A+ go for it. But your disbelief in gods says nothing about your politics or how you treat people. Saying that you are of a political or philosophical persuasion can tell me more about you than you simply saying you don't believe in god(s)


A series of fun one-liners about various pseudoscientific claims and, even better, a concise description of the scientific method - Ken Feder on Skeptic Friends Network from "Frauds, Myths and Mysteries"
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 7 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.11 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000