Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Politics
 Obama's New Gun Control Grab, Not So Fast
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

sailingsoul
SFN Addict

2830 Posts

Posted - 05/06/2013 :  17:35:17  Show Profile Send sailingsoul a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Well, this is interesting. Anyone catch wind of this on the main stream media? This is taking Jury Nullification of laws to a whole new level, state level directed at the Fed's.
Article Posted May 2, 2013
In mid-April, Kansas passed a law asserting that federal gun regulations do not apply to guns made and owned in Kansas. Under the law, Kansans could manufacture and sell semi-automatic weapons in-state without a federal license or any federal oversight.,,,

,,,Bills similar to Kansas’ law have been introduced in at least 37 other states.
How about them cookies?

There are only two types of religious people, the deceivers and the deceived. SS

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 05/06/2013 :  22:12:02   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Such brash assertions of States' Rights didn't work so well in 1861.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie

USA
4826 Posts

Posted - 05/07/2013 :  05:47:23   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Valiant Dancer's Homepage Send Valiant Dancer a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dave W.

Such brash assertions of States' Rights didn't work so well in 1861.


In this case, I think it is more symbolic. (You know, this is how state legislatures waste your money.) It is showing that 37 states disagree with the path gun control is going. However, the laws passed will not survive judicial review. They are UnConstitutional on their face and are unenforcable.

Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils

Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion
Go to Top of Page

sailingsoul
SFN Addict

2830 Posts

Posted - 05/07/2013 :  08:32:19   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send sailingsoul a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Valiant Dancer

Originally posted by Dave W.

Such brash assertions of States' Rights didn't work so well in 1861.


In this case, I think it is more symbolic. (You know, this is how state legislatures waste your money.) It is showing that 37 states disagree with the path gun control is going. However, the laws passed will not survive judicial review. They are UnConstitutional on their face and are unenforcable.
Yep! you both make valid points. I like to add when it comes down to it, laws are only applied to those who are less powerful than those who wish to enforce them. I'm sure we can all see examples of that happening all over the place whether it is with international treaties, federal, states or lessor laws. It really is those with sufficient power money or influence have a greater chance to do what they want and get away with it. Comes down to it, it's just more of what goes on in the carnival we're all part of.

There are only two types of religious people, the deceivers and the deceived. SS
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 05/07/2013 :  16:57:55   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Valiant Dancer

However, the laws passed will not survive judicial review. They are UnConstitutional on their face and are unenforcable.
The problem isn't unenforceability (?), it's the fact that if the law passes, then the Feds will be obligated to send little armies of ATF agents out to enforce Federal law as soon as companies start making and selling weapons which violate it. Ruby Ridge again, but the compounds under siege by jack-booted G-Men will be factories and warehouses.

The legislators are, in effect, setting people up to be arrested and/or shot for a principle that runs counter to the evidence.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie

USA
4826 Posts

Posted - 05/08/2013 :  05:33:41   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Valiant Dancer's Homepage Send Valiant Dancer a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dave W.

Originally posted by Valiant Dancer

However, the laws passed will not survive judicial review. They are UnConstitutional on their face and are unenforcable.
The problem isn't unenforceability (?), it's the fact that if the law passes, then the Feds will be obligated to send little armies of ATF agents out to enforce Federal law as soon as companies start making and selling weapons which violate it. Ruby Ridge again, but the compounds under siege by jack-booted G-Men will be factories and warehouses.

The legislators are, in effect, setting people up to be arrested and/or shot for a principle that runs counter to the evidence.


The thing is that this is a symbolic act. If they wanted the same effect, they could merely announce that they refuse to enforce such laws and will arrest any Federal agent attempting to enforce those laws.

Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils

Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion
Go to Top of Page

H. Humbert
SFN Die Hard

USA
4574 Posts

Posted - 05/08/2013 :  08:09:20   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send H. Humbert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Valiant Dancer
If they wanted the same effect, they could merely announce that they refuse to enforce such laws and will arrest any Federal agent attempting to enforce those laws.
No, state law enforcement do not have the power to arrest Federal agents.

"A man is his own easiest dupe, for what he wishes to be true he generally believes to be true." --Demosthenes

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool." --Richard P. Feynman

"Face facts with dignity." --found inside a fortune cookie
Go to Top of Page

Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie

USA
4826 Posts

Posted - 05/08/2013 :  08:13:42   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Valiant Dancer's Homepage Send Valiant Dancer a Private Message  Reply with Quote
valiant dancer
Originally posted by H. Humbert

Originally posted by Valiant Dancer
If they wanted the same effect, they could merely announce that they refuse to enforce such laws and will arrest any Federal agent attempting to enforce those laws.
No, state law enforcement do not have the power to arrest Federal agents.


That is not absolute nor bastion against states from ordering people with guns to do their bidding.

Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils

Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion
Go to Top of Page

H. Humbert
SFN Die Hard

USA
4574 Posts

Posted - 05/08/2013 :  11:03:12   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send H. Humbert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Valiant Dancer
That is not absolute nor bastion against states from ordering people with guns to do their bidding.
Yeah, Civil War is always an option.

"A man is his own easiest dupe, for what he wishes to be true he generally believes to be true." --Demosthenes

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool." --Richard P. Feynman

"Face facts with dignity." --found inside a fortune cookie
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 05/08/2013 :  12:14:03   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Valiant Dancer

The thing is that this is a symbolic act. If they wanted the same effect, they could merely announce that they refuse to enforce such laws and will arrest any Federal agent attempting to enforce those laws.
State law enforcement officials don't enforce Federal laws. If they did, we wouldn't need the FBI, DEA, ATF, etc.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.08 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000