Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Community Forums
 General Discussion
 Quantum Physics and the Multiplicity Of Mind
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Alexander1304
Skeptic Friend

75 Posts

Posted - 10/21/2015 :  06:27:14  Show Profile Send Alexander1304 a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Recently I've read this article about quantum physics and the multiplicity of mind: split-brains,fragmented minds,dissociation,quantum consciousness :

http://journalofcosmology.com/QuantumConsciousness102.html

Here are few outlines:
Preface:
"
Quantum physics and Einstein's theory of relativity make assumptions about the nature of the mind which is assumed to be a singularity. In the Copenhagen model of physics, the process of observing is believed to effect reality by the act of perception and knowing which creates abstractions and a collapse function thereby inducing discontinuity into the continuum of the quantum state. This gives rise to the uncertainty principle. Yet neither the mind or the brain is a singularity, but a multiplicity which include two dominant streams of consciousness and awareness associated with the left and right hemisphere, as demonstrated by patients whose brains have been split, and which are superimposed on yet other mental realms maintained by the brainstem, thalamus, limbic system, and the occipital, temporal, parietal, and frontal lobes. Like the quantum state, each of these minds may also become discontinuous from each other and each mental realm may perceive their own reality."


"Like the Copenhagen school, Von Neumann's formulation of quantum mechanics (1932, 1937), fails to recognize or understand the multiple nature of mind and reality."

What do You guys think?Does that mean that Copenhagen is disproved by that simple observation?Or it is speculation?

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 10/22/2015 :  11:56:59   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Alexander1304

What do You guys think?
I think the author misunderstands what an "observation" is in the context of QM. It is any interaction between two (or more) particles. The "process of observing" is thus not separate from "reality," and has nothing to do with "perception and knowing" (since particles neither perceive nor know anything).
Does that mean that Copenhagen is disproved by that simple observation?Or it is speculation?
It's an attempt to explain consciousness by throwing the term "quantum" around without grokking it, like Deepak Chopra.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

ThorGoLucky
Snuggle Wolf

USA
1487 Posts

Posted - 10/22/2015 :  15:17:10   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit ThorGoLucky's Homepage Send ThorGoLucky a Private Message  Reply with Quote
If simple observation causes wave functions to collapse, we would never be able to observer the interference pattern in double-slit experiments.

Mind-body duality has been thoroughly disproved, thanks to ongoing brain research. Consciousness is an emergence of brain activity. As candle flames are processes that eventually die from lack of fuel, lack of oxygen, or destruction, so do brains and their lights of consciousnesses die out.
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 10/22/2015 :  17:26:07   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by ThorGoLucky

If simple observation causes wave functions to collapse, we would never be able to observer the interference pattern in double-slit experiments.
The interference pattern is the result of photons interacting the screen (light areas) or themselves (dark areas). It's only "simple" observation that makes it work.

Now, if an intelligent observer were required, then we'd never see the interference patterns, because we'd never observe the photons (they're all aimed at the slits and screen, not our eyes).

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

ThorGoLucky
Snuggle Wolf

USA
1487 Posts

Posted - 10/26/2015 :  19:38:38   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit ThorGoLucky's Homepage Send ThorGoLucky a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Dave W, indeed. New Age folks including the What the Bleep movie show the observation at the slit(s) as a passive observer, simply standing there watching. If that's all it takes to cause the wave pattern to collapse then we'd never see any wave pattern in any of the experiments, but that's not the case so it's bunk. It's not observation, it's *interference*, as I try to explain to those folks.
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.05 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000