Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Community Forums
 General Discussion
 LET'S KILL SOME BABYS!!
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic 
Page: of 2

Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie

USA
4826 Posts

Posted - 01/28/2003 :  08:36:28   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Valiant Dancer's Homepage Send Valiant Dancer a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Slater

Don't feed them to what?



Pit Bulls. It's inhumane to the Pit Bulls.


Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils

Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion
Go to Top of Page

Gorgo
SFN Die Hard

USA
5310 Posts

Posted - 01/28/2003 :  08:52:03   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Gorgo a Private Message
DO WE GET TO SEE SOME DEAD BABIES OR NOT??!!!??

I know the rent is in arrears
The dog has not been fed in years
It's even worse than it appears
But it's alright-
Jerry Garcia
Robert Hunter



Go to Top of Page

Legallee Insane
Skeptic Friend

Canada
126 Posts

Posted - 01/28/2003 :  17:28:31   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Legallee Insane a Private Message
quote:
shouter:
SUPPOSE IT WERE LEGAL,IF YOU CHOSE, TO HAVE YOUR BABY KILLED BY THE AGE OF ONE AT APPROVED "CLINICS" WHERE THEY WOULD PUT YOUR BABY IN AN INDUSTRIAL SIZE BLENDER.



Let's just suppose that you came up with the stupidest possible hypothetical situation. Why is it stupid? Mostly because that would qualify as murder. I think I see that you are basically trying to say, "what if it were legal to take your baby to a doctor to have it killed before a certain age?" The biggest problem with that is the fact that it qualifies as euthanasia, which is illegal.

P.S.
Nobody likes trolls.

--"Only the fool says in his heart: There is no god -- The wise says it to the world"
--"I darn you to HECK!" - Catbert
--"Don't worry, we're not laughing at you, we're laughing near you."
Edited by - Legallee Insane on 01/28/2003 17:30:15
Go to Top of Page

THE SHOUTER
New Member

9 Posts

Posted - 01/28/2003 :  20:45:30   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send THE SHOUTER a Private Message
CAN WE JUST BE SKEPTIC FRIENDS?
LISA, I MEANT SLUT IN A GOOD WAY. YOU WOULDN'T ACTUALLY INVOLUNTARILY EDIT ME WOULD YOU? AT LEAST NOT WHEN YOU THINK YOU ARE WINNING THE ARGUEMENT.
I WORK FOR A LARGE INSTITUTION THAT EMPLOYS MOSTLY WOMEN. I KNOW ALOT OF YOUNG WOMEN, SOME ARE PROMISCUOUS. I LIKE WOMEN WHO KNOW WHAT THEY WANT, TAKE IT AND FEEL GOOD ABOUT IT. THEY HAVE STRONG HEALTHY EGOS.
MY DEFINITION OF A SLUT IS SOMEONE WHO HAS SEX IN AN IRRESPONSIBLE OR DANGEROUS WAY. FREQUENCY DOES NOT COME INTO IT. FOR EXAMPLE HAVING SEX WITH SOMEONE YOU DON'T KNOW, NOT HAVING SAFE SEX, NOT USING CONTRACEPTION OR USING IT HAPHAZARDLY.
ANYONE HAVING FOUR OR MORE ABORTIONS IS DOING SOMETHING VERY WRONG. TWO ABORTIONS WOULD SEEM TO BE AN ADEQUATE WAKE-UP CALL THAT SOMETHING IS NOT RIGHT. TO ANYONE WHO MAY NEED ADVICE THIS IS A VERY GOOD WEB-SITE http//www.plannedparenthood.org/ec/
I AM SORRY IF MY INITIAL POSTING WAS NOT OBVIOUS ENOUGH FOR EVERYONE TO UNDERSTAND. I WAS SAYING THAT INTELLECTUALLY ANTI-ABORTION PEOPLE DO NOT REALLY BELIEVE THAT A FETUS EQUALS AN INFANT THEREFORE A FETUS DOES NOT HAVE THE SAME RIGHTS AS AN INFANT THEREFORE THOSE RIGHTS ARE NEGOTIABLE. WE AS A SOCIETY NEGOTIATE THOSE RIGHTS. WE HAVE AND WE AS A SOCIETY DECIDED ON THE CURRENT ABORTION LAWS. SO THEY SHOULD BE SAYING YES A FETUS DOES NOT HAVE FULL HUMAN RIGHTS SO LETS NEGOTIATE WHAT RIGHTS THEY SHOULD HAVE INSTEAD OF FIGHTING FOR 30 MORE YEARS.
Go to Top of Page

Fireballn
Skeptic Friend

Canada
179 Posts

Posted - 01/28/2003 :  21:02:27   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Fireballn a Private Message
The Shouter quote

"I MEANT SLUT IN A GOOD WAY."

"MY DEFINITION OF A SLUT IS SOMEONE WHO HAS SEX IN AN IRRESPONSIBLE OR DANGEROUS WAY."


You're digging yourself a nice little hole there aren't ya.....

If i were the supreme being, I wouldn't have messed around with butterflies and daffodils. I would have started with lasers 8 o'clock day one!
-Time Bandits-
Edited by - Fireballn on 01/28/2003 21:09:23
Go to Top of Page

Snake
SFN Addict

USA
2511 Posts

Posted - 01/28/2003 :  23:35:58   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Snake's Homepage  Send Snake an ICQ Message  Send Snake a Yahoo! Message Send Snake a Private Message
For a long time now I've been thinking of talking about this or starting a new folder but this might be a good place to start.
On an e-group about anti-PETA I got into some arguments with those people who think what PETA does is wrong. No one in that group ever mentioned being religious but the tone of their messages sure sound like it. One of their bottom lines was that Humans are more important than any other animal. And that PETA goes too far trying to protect all the helpless animals that humans try to hurt.
My contention is that they (humans) are NOT more important.
I think humans are about equal with cockroches, they are all over the place and mess it up too much.
There are not enough abortions as far as I'm concerned. Stomp out humans as if they were bugs.
At least the ones that aren't born yet. It's only cells, it's not human until it's able to walk and talk. But then, by that time it could be a monster.
Go to Top of Page

Doomar
SFN Regular

USA
714 Posts

Posted - 01/29/2003 :  04:23:02   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Doomar's Homepage Send Doomar a Private Message

I DO THINK THEY ARE MORAL PEOPLE. I DON'T THINK THEY BELIEVE THEIR OWN RHETORIC THAT BABYS ARE BEING KILLED.

The term "pro-life" depicts a respect for all human life, born and unborn, mother and baby alike. When a law is passed to allow people to 'legally' kill others we don't like of any age, you will probably see more pro-lifers killed than abortionists and the murder of unborn babies will continue on in the guise of ending unwanted pregnances.
We think we are a civilized society and laugh at the people who worship idols. Many in this network laugh at those who worship God, yet abortionists (I include mothers in this) give blood sacrifice on the altar of the god of free sex or selfishness or 'women's rights'.
Ask yourself, you who deny this, was there any blood spilled out of this little bundle of human fetus or was it simply a malignant tissue growth? Who was that blood spilled for?

Mark 10:27 (NKJV) 27But Jesus looked at them and said, “With men it is impossible, but not with God; for with God all things are possible.”

www.pastorsb.com.htm
Go to Top of Page

@tomic
Administrator

USA
4607 Posts

Posted - 01/29/2003 :  09:34:48   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit @tomic's Homepage Send @tomic a Private Message
We can't have name calling like this on SFN. This one is locked.

@tomic

Gravity, not just a good idea...it's the law!

Sportsbettingacumen.com: The science of sports betting
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic   
Previous Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.08 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000