Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Creation/Evolution
 Attn. Creation88: 5) Neanderthal and Down's Syndr.
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Dr. Mabuse
Septic Fiend

Sweden
9688 Posts

Posted - 07/01/2003 :  14:19:56  Show Profile  Send Dr. Mabuse an ICQ Message Send Dr. Mabuse a Private Message
Creation88 wrote:
quote:
5. And then theres the fact that, a Neanderthal, has the exact scull of a person with Downs Syndrome. It's really gonna be a shock when a coupl hundred years from now, they think they found a Neanderthal scull, then they do some DNA testing and it's just some poor kid with down syndrome from our generation. Boy will that be a slap in the face.


Again, I'm curious where you get your information from. What source do you have for this, and what is his/her/its credentials?

It doesn't take much digging on the internet to find these things.
Have a look at this:
(I forgot to mail the link from work, but it should be an easy find if you care to use google)

quote:
Contact: Dr William Goodwin
w.goodwin@formed.gla.ac.uk
44-141-330-4574
University of Glasgow


Neanderthal infant yields DNA evidence
Modern forensic DNA techniques normally used to determine the identity of modern humans have been applied to a Neanderthal infant. This is only the second time molecular analysis of a Neanderthal has been possible and the first molecular analysis undertaken on a specimen that has been radio-carbon dated and shown to be alive at the same time as modern humans.

The results show that modern man was not in fact descended from Neanderthals, supporting the out-of-Africa model of modern human evolution where modern humans emerged from Africa around 100,000 ago replacing archaic predecessors such as the Neanderthals.

A short summary of the whole article: The carbondating say that this infant Neanderthal is ~30'000 years old, from "the end" of the Neanderthal era, and that the result of the DNA testing is that closest common relative lived 500'000 years ago. That's when the branching of the spieces took place.

Creation88, you seem a bit overconfident when you write things like:
quote:
Boy will that be a slap in the face.

I can understand how layman can come up with the idea that a Neanderthal's skeleton looks like a Man with Down's Syndrome, especially if that idea would support his view of the world. It would probably take a degree in anatomy to determine which skeleton is which.

This research quoted above clearly proves that Neanderthal is not a "Man with Down's Syndrome". Creation88, I would like to know what conclusions you draw from this post.

Dr. Mabuse - "When the going gets tough, the tough get Duct-tape..."
Dr. Mabuse whisper.mp3

"Equivocation is not just a job, for a creationist it's a way of life..." Dr. Mabuse

Support American Troops in Iraq:
Send them unarmed civilians for target practice..
Collateralmurder.

jmcginn
Skeptic Friend

343 Posts

Posted - 07/01/2003 :  15:15:51   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit jmcginn's Homepage Send jmcginn a Private Message
quote:
It would probably take a degree in anatomy to determine which skeleton is which.

Sadly it doesn't even take this. There is plenty of information available on the human skeleton and the effects of disease on it. All it takes is diligence, hard work, and allot of reading. A great place to start for those already with a basic understanding of anatomy and who wish to know more about the human skeleton is Human Osteology by White, T.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0127466126/qid=1057097264/sr=2-2/ref=sr_2_2/002-6535629-9189652

This book is probably one of the best available on the human skeleton, but there are others including ones specializing in diseases and their effects:

For a few more:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-handle-form/002-6535629-9189652

Basically 3 kinds of people can look at Neandertal skeletons and come to the conclusion that they are modern humans suffering from disease:
1. Those who have never studied the matter, but make the claims nonetheless to verify their world view.
2. Those who have examined the matter, but intentionally lie about it again to verify their world view.
3. Those who have been tricked into believing someone (either a #1 or #2) that this is the case.

The idea that Neandertals were humans suffering from some disease (rickets) has been invalidated since the 19th century.
Go to Top of Page

Phobos
New Member

USA
47 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2003 :  12:32:49   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Phobos a Private Message
some more discussion of this point in this thread...
http://www.skepticfriends.org/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=2106
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.06 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000