Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Creation/Evolution
 My argument against evolution
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 11

ASR
Skeptic Friend

69 Posts

Posted - 10/14/2005 :  11:22:08   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit ASR's Homepage Send ASR a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by furshur

ASR said:
[quote]This just plain wrong. Your definition is just that - your definition. By redefining the words and setting up your arbitrary boundries you have creates a fantasy world.

Of course science can ask what is this object used for. Or what does this object do. Just because you define these questions as philosophy does not make it so - these are FUNDEMENTAL scientific questions.


Obviously Logic cannot ask what the pencil is used for, otherwise the logical brain would be able to identify what the pencil is used for. If it is preference, I can refer to science/philosophy as logic/creative and revise the formula as logic + creative = Emotion

From the moon they looked down to see if we measured up
Go to Top of Page

furshur
SFN Regular

USA
1536 Posts

Posted - 10/14/2005 :  11:30:26   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send furshur a Private Message
quote:
Obviously Logic cannot ask what the pencil is used for


WTF???

If you cannot apply logic to anthing except yes or no questions, I believe this is a shortcoming on your part. Don't put that limitation on the rest of us.



If I knew then what I know now then I would know more now than I know.
Go to Top of Page

Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie

USA
4826 Posts

Posted - 10/14/2005 :  12:12:01   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Valiant Dancer's Homepage Send Valiant Dancer a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by furshur

quote:
Obviously Logic cannot ask what the pencil is used for


WTF???

If you cannot apply logic to anthing except yes or no questions, I believe this is a shortcoming on your part. Don't put that limitation on the rest of us.






He's changing the meaning of Logic.

Perhaps if ASR could provide us with a translation lexicon of terms he has redefined in common terminology we could decipher what it is he is saying.

Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils

Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion
Go to Top of Page

GeeMack
SFN Regular

USA
1093 Posts

Posted - 10/14/2005 :  12:12:40   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send GeeMack a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by ASR...

Truth is now three colours, and does not fit into your limitations.
Science, philosophy, emotion, and evolution all have fairly clear meanings, and you, ASR, don't have a realistic handle on any of them. The way these things are understood by most people don't fit within the limitations you have arbitrarily chosen to apply to them, and to yourself. You sound like a man irreversibly locked in a fantasy and desperately trying to conform the world so it makes sense within the very narrow boundaries of your own delusion.

The world with all its natural laws, philosophy, science, evolution, and uncountable other criteria that you conveniently fail to recognize, will not become something different simply because you choose to change and rechange your definitions, your rules, your limitations, and your perceptions every time part of reality isn't working out the way you'd like.

You see, we skeptics generally aren't all that uncomfortable with ourselves, our place in the world, or our general understanding of life. We don't carry some distorted picture of reality in our minds and feel some need to change the laws of nature or the process of science in order to suit that picture. We study, observe, research, and think. We make an effort to understand how all the bits and pieces of reality fit together. We don't change definitions of those pieces in order to support some arbitrary preexisting beliefs. In fact we change our beliefs when we find there are better, more rational, more reasonable ways to assemble the pieces.

Most of all, we skeptics rarely run around actively trying to sway others to change their way of thinking, to believe in or agree with some delusion, as you "faithful" are so often inclined to do. We offer our advice, our enlightenment as it were, when someone like you, someone so obviously uncomfortable with your position in life, approaches us with questions. But we don't proselytize. Remember, you came knocking on our door.

Now I won't try to tell you what you should or shouldn't believe. I will tell you this, however, and it is something that might bring you much comfort if you take the time to understand: The world absolutely will not change in order to fit within your preconceived and very limited idea of how things should be. The world, including science, philosophy, emotion, and evolution, is the way it is, and will continue to be as it is, regardless of your vain attempts to arbitrarily change it by changing definitions to suit your whim. You can find much peace and comfort by recognizing this and by broadening your understanding of reality to accept and embrace this unalterable truth.

** grammar edit
Edited by - GeeMack on 10/14/2005 12:21:23
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 10/14/2005 :  20:22:07   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by GeeMack

You sound like a man irreversibly locked in a fantasy and desperately trying to conform the world so it makes sense within the very narrow boundaries of your own delusion.
You nailed it, GeeMack. You see, ASR wasn't kidding when he said he has schizophrenia.

This may seem patronizing, but I think it's important (especially since it's obviously frustrating people) that everyone realize that ASR doesn't think like most people. I mean, at a fundamental level, he thinks differently. This isn't a matter of someone having some facts wrong, and building incorrect-but-logical conclusions from invalid premises. Instead, ASR actually reasons in a wholly different - some would say 'alien' - manner.

It took me a while to get this.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

R.Wreck
SFN Regular

USA
1191 Posts

Posted - 10/15/2005 :  09:59:08   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send R.Wreck a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by ASR:

Alright, I concede, I cannot disprove evolution with this theory.


Thank you.

quote:
Keep in mind all I wanted to do was save good people such as yourselves from a dire fate.


And that fate would be...what exactly?

quote:
That said, I would like to continue the discussion as Science+Philosophy = Emotion.


Which is pointless. We might as well discuss Pizza + Obsequious = Sweepstakes. (Amazingly, Googling obsequious pizza returned over 48,000 hits!)

quote:
Here's a good idea - have a POINT. It makes it SO much more interesting for the listener!

-Steve Martin, Planes, Trains & Automobiles


The foundation of morality is to . . . give up pretending to believe that for which there is no evidence, and repeating unintelligible propositions about things beyond the possibliities of knowledge.
T. H. Huxley

The Cattle Prod of Enlightened Compassion
Go to Top of Page

Dude
SFN Die Hard

USA
6891 Posts

Posted - 10/15/2005 :  13:39:28   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Dude a Private Message
quote:
It took me a while to get this.


He says he is mentally ill on his webpage. And his writing pretty clearly demonstrates an inability to rationally communicate.

I just hope he keeps taking his meds.


Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong.
-- Thomas Jefferson

"god :: the last refuge of a man with no answers and no argument." - G. Carlin

Hope, n.
The handmaiden of desperation; the opiate of despair; the illegible signpost on the road to perdition. ~~ da filth
Go to Top of Page

astropin
SFN Regular

USA
970 Posts

Posted - 12/02/2005 :  11:42:50   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send astropin a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by R.Wreck
(Amazingly, Googling obsequious pizza returned over 48,000 hits!)




Yes, but googling "obsequious pizza" returns zero.

I would rather face a cold reality than delude myself with comforting fantasies.

You are free to believe what you want to believe and I am free to ridicule you for it.

Atheism:
The result of an unbiased and rational search for the truth.

Infinitus est numerus stultorum
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 11 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.16 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000