|
|
j911ob
Skeptic Friend
223 Posts |
Posted - 05/08/2007 : 07:40:25 [Permalink]
|
quote: Originally posted by Dave W.
quote: Originally posted by j911ob
Ill take that bet. Please find me the quotes of people who say aliens did it. Proceed.
Here's one:"After Flight 93 came down in Pennsylvania, they saw a craft buzzing around. Now what was that? All earth air traffic had been grounded. And in the World Trade Centre, where are all the bodies? They were transported out first to be experimented on. Listen to me now, September 11 was all caused by aliens."
It was certainly a fresh view of the events of a year ago but then again the person propagating it was wearing a T-shirt bearing the slogan: "Beam Me Up, Jesus".
No im talking about building 7. That was the specific allegation. Find me a quote that says 7 was brought down by aliens. |
"Any pressurized can exposed to heat will explode like a grenade. Even a sealed bag of potato chips, if not melted by direct flame, can 'pop' with quite a report." - Kookbreaker at JREF, responding to reports of explosions in the towers. |
|
|
j911ob
Skeptic Friend
223 Posts |
Posted - 05/08/2007 : 07:41:53 [Permalink]
|
Please be precise davew. The bet was that he could find testimonial of peoplwho SAW aliens collapsing BUILDING 7.
Proceed. |
"Any pressurized can exposed to heat will explode like a grenade. Even a sealed bag of potato chips, if not melted by direct flame, can 'pop' with quite a report." - Kookbreaker at JREF, responding to reports of explosions in the towers. |
|
|
Dave W.
Info Junkie
USA
26022 Posts |
Posted - 05/08/2007 : 08:05:46 [Permalink]
|
quote: Originally posted by j911ob
No im talking about building 7. That was the specific allegation. Find me a quote that says 7 was brought down by aliens.
How much more precise than "...September 11 was all caused by aliens" do you need? Building 7 coming down was a part of 9/11, and this guy says it was all caused by aliens. Ah, but now you're playing lawyer about the language, so nevermind. |
- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail) Evidently, I rock! Why not question something for a change? Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too. |
|
|
j911ob
Skeptic Friend
223 Posts |
Posted - 05/08/2007 : 08:42:57 [Permalink]
|
quote: Originally posted by Dave W.
quote: Originally posted by j911ob
No im talking about building 7. That was the specific allegation. Find me a quote that says 7 was brought down by aliens.
How much more precise than "...September 11 was all caused by aliens" do you need? Building 7 coming down was a part of 9/11, and this guy says it was all caused by aliens. Ah, but now you're playing lawyer about the language, so nevermind.
No the bet was that he could produce testimonials of people who SAW building 7 be brought down by aliens. You have failed to produce them. The bet stands. |
"Any pressurized can exposed to heat will explode like a grenade. Even a sealed bag of potato chips, if not melted by direct flame, can 'pop' with quite a report." - Kookbreaker at JREF, responding to reports of explosions in the towers. |
|
|
Ricky
SFN Die Hard
USA
4907 Posts |
|
j911ob
Skeptic Friend
223 Posts |
Posted - 05/08/2007 : 10:15:34 [Permalink]
|
quote: Originally posted by Ricky
No, my bet was:
quote: I bet I could find testimonials of people who claim to have seen extra terrestrials do it.
The "it" referred to 9/11.
The point was that testimonials are crap. You don't believe them when you see them on TV, you don't believe them when someone is claiming that they are psychic, so why the hell would you believe them here? You change your standard of evidence because you want to believe in the conspiracy.
Wow those goalposts are on ski's. You were talking about building 7 and you lost the bet.
I notice you are not skeptical of the testimony of people who support the official story. |
"Any pressurized can exposed to heat will explode like a grenade. Even a sealed bag of potato chips, if not melted by direct flame, can 'pop' with quite a report." - Kookbreaker at JREF, responding to reports of explosions in the towers. |
|
|
Ricky
SFN Die Hard
USA
4907 Posts |
|
Dave W.
Info Junkie
USA
26022 Posts |
Posted - 05/08/2007 : 11:16:51 [Permalink]
|
quote: Originally posted by Ricky
How did you come to this conclusion? Have I ever stated what I think on the matter? No, I have not.
j911ob is obviously so desperate to score political points - since he's got no evidence to support his major claims - that he's just making up stuff about people here. The irony being that with such skills, he'd have little trouble getting a job with the Bush administration. |
- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail) Evidently, I rock! Why not question something for a change? Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too. |
|
|
JohnOAS
SFN Regular
Australia
800 Posts |
Posted - 05/08/2007 : 19:39:29 [Permalink]
|
quote: Originally posted by j911ob
quote: Originally posted by JohnOAS
quote: Originally posted by j911ob But what if the building had stood for another 12 hours? How did the BBC manage to predict it just 20 minutes before?
If it had then you'd be here telling us all how it was predicted 12 hours early, and that this is even better proof of your theory. Had it been 10 seconds before the collapse, that too, would be obvious proof that your theory is correct. The great thing about conspiracy theories is that they can accommodate pretty much any fact as support, it just makes the conspiracy a little more complex.
Of course, if it was simply a reporting stuff up, the 20 minute figure is not proof of anything.
It's much more fun when you can assume your conclusion in order to support that conclusion though, isn't it?
The whole body of evidence, such as the motive I posted above and the EMT testimonies and the certainty people seemed to have of this imminent unprecedented collapse point to it being done deliberately.
There is no way they could leave that building standing , preventing them from rescuing their fallen brothers.
So, misdirection aside, what again is the significance of the 20 minutes figure, and why is it better or worse than 12 hours? Even if it was done deliberately, why what makes you think the BBC announcement was anything other than a non-conspiratorial screw up? |
John's just this guy, you know. |
|
|
|
|