Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Religion
 Atheism and Morals
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 10

JEROME DA GNOME
BANNED

2418 Posts

Posted - 06/23/2007 :  14:45:51   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send JEROME DA GNOME a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Cuneiformist

Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME
You are making a claim. Present a Hebrew dictionary that defines adultery as only sex with a married woman.
The Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon, while dated, is still the standard for working with the Hebrew Bible. Under N'P, it defines it as "to commit adultery" further qualifying it as "usu[ally] of a man, always with the wife of another." That is, it goes one way: a married woman can't have sex outside of marriage; a married man can have sex with a single woman (though he'd probably have to marry her, too!).


Cool, I will let my wife know.

So how does this allow the raping of children?




What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell
Go to Top of Page

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 06/23/2007 :  15:02:05   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME

Originally posted by Cuneiformist

Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME
You are making a claim. Present a Hebrew dictionary that defines adultery as only sex with a married woman.
The Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon, while dated, is still the standard for working with the Hebrew Bible. Under N'P, it defines it as "to commit adultery" further qualifying it as "usu[ally] of a man, always with the wife of another." That is, it goes one way: a married woman can't have sex outside of marriage; a married man can have sex with a single woman (though he'd probably have to marry her, too!).
Cool, I will let my wife know.
Wow-- you're a real jerk! Your sarcastic answer-- mocking, really-- was completely uncalled for. If you aren't interested in learning the truth then don't ask and go back to your conspiracy sites.

So how does this allow the raping of children?
The point was simply that Biblical law as laid out in the Ten Commandments-- and in the cultural context of ancient Near Eastern society-- is inadequate for our modern ideals of right and wrong. In a culture where women (particularly unmarried woman) were a commodity, the "punishment" for having intercourse (whether she wanted it or not) with such a woman was simply that you had to marry her-- and of course compensate the father. That's radically different from our modern idea of right and wrong.

Moreover, you claimed a sort of "literal" approach to following the Ten Commandments, but when shown that the "literal" Hebrew is often quite different from the modern English equivalents, you've dodged the issue.




[/quote]
Go to Top of Page

JEROME DA GNOME
BANNED

2418 Posts

Posted - 06/23/2007 :  15:06:39   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send JEROME DA GNOME a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Cune, did you read this post:

Fripp asked, "So you pick and choose what you will and will not base your morals on, correct?"

Jerome responded:Correct.



What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell
Go to Top of Page

JEROME DA GNOME
BANNED

2418 Posts

Posted - 06/23/2007 :  15:11:12   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send JEROME DA GNOME a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME

Originally posted by Cuneiformist

Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME

I derive my moral code from the Ten Commandments, although not as religion teaches. I look to the actual meanings of the words.
But given that they were written in Hebrew, perhaps as many as 3000 years ago, and based on even earlier legal systems, how can you possibly really know "the actual meanings of the words"?


Definitions of words and context of words denote meaning.




I also said the above. Having a hard time understanding what I am saying beyond what you think I think.


What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell
Go to Top of Page

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 06/23/2007 :  17:27:42   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME

Cune, did you read this post:

Fripp asked, "So you pick and choose what you will and will not base your morals on, correct?"

Jerome responded:Correct.
Yeah, I saw it. The context (you know, that thing you think is so important) was a question about why you follow the Ten Commandments, and not, for instance, the various other laws prescribed in the Hebrew Bible.

More over, as you stated here, you " I derive my moral code from the Ten Commandments" and "look to the actual meanings of the words." I and other have argued that the "actual meanings" of the words aren't what you think. This is because the Ten Commandments weren't written in English at some time in the recent past. Rather, they were in Hebrew, and have their origins in ancient cultures thousands of years old.
Go to Top of Page

Dude
SFN Die Hard

USA
6891 Posts

Posted - 06/23/2007 :  23:18:24   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Dude a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Jerome asked:
So how does this allow the raping of children?


You said you derived your moral values from the ten commandments.

Obviously there is no prohibition against child-rape in any version of those commandments.


Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong.
-- Thomas Jefferson

"god :: the last refuge of a man with no answers and no argument." - G. Carlin

Hope, n.
The handmaiden of desperation; the opiate of despair; the illegible signpost on the road to perdition. ~~ da filth
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 10 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.11 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000