Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Conspiracy Theories
 American Education used by National Gov
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

JEROME DA GNOME
BANNED

2418 Posts

Posted - 06/23/2007 :  15:23:36   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send JEROME DA GNOME a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Ricky, the various theories you presented as to why this happens are also called for in this document. Would you presume that the stated goals of government with the goals being reached are nothing more than coincidence.


What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell
Go to Top of Page

Ricky
SFN Die Hard

USA
4907 Posts

Posted - 06/23/2007 :  16:11:11   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Ricky an AOL message Send Ricky a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME

Ricky, the various theories you presented as to why this happens are also called for in this document. Would you presume that the stated goals of government with the goals being reached are nothing more than coincidence.


That the government emphasizes the use of birth control to prevent unwanted pregnancy should be of no surprise.

But are you saying that the government educated women, decreased the child mortality rate, and made it more expensive to have kids just so that people would have 2 per family? Cause that's certainly what it sounds like.

And if it's not, what in the hell are you saying?

Why continue? Because we must. Because we have the call. Because it is nobler to fight for rationality without winning than to give up in the face of continued defeats. Because whatever true progress humanity makes is through the rationality of the occasional individual and because any one individual we may win for the cause may do more for humanity than a hundred thousand who hug their superstitions to their breast.
- Isaac Asimov
Edited by - Ricky on 06/23/2007 16:11:28
Go to Top of Page

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 06/23/2007 :  21:22:38   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME

Halfmooner said "Will you admit that the very subject of the OP, "American Education used by National Gov," was dishonest or wildly incorrect, and that the policy paper in question was former US foreign policy and that the US Federal government never has and is not now forcing US public schools to teach kids that only two kids in a family is ideal?"


Do you have any evidence that this policy is no longer being implemented?


Classic trolling tactic: Make a wildly unsupportable statement, then demand others to prove it's not so.

We simply don't have to prove a negative, Jerome. You have to prove your original staement.

(You never read my link about how critical thinking works, did you?)


Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Go to Top of Page

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 06/23/2007 :  21:32:18   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME

Originally posted by Ricky


Do you have any evidence that this policy is no longer being implemented?


You have yet to show any instance of this policy ever actually being used.



http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4847a1.htm

"Since 1972, the average family size has leveled off at approximately two children"

A stated goal, a goal achieved.


The 1974 foreign policy paper was about trying to lower birthrates in Third World countries. Even though you choose to ignore that glaring fact, and not to respond to my challenge, that fact remains.

So: WTF does the declining birthrate in the USA have to do with this? You moved the goalposts yet again, another blatantly dishonest trolling technique. And you know what? You fooled nobody. Every spectator in the grandstands saw you move 'em.


Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Edited by - HalfMooner on 06/23/2007 21:52:14
Go to Top of Page

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 06/23/2007 :  21:41:20   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by HalfMooner
So: WTF does the declining birthrate in the USA have to do with this? You moved the goalposts yet again, another blatantly dishonest trolling technique. And you know what? You fooled nobody. Every spectator in the grandstands saw you move 'em.
Tis true!
Go to Top of Page

Trish
SFN Addict

USA
2102 Posts

Posted - 06/23/2007 :  23:24:49   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Trish a Private Message  Reply with Quote
OK, the CDC data are from 72, the memo is from 74. There is about a 20 year period in which this could not be policy during which birth rates fell off to approx. 2 children per family. As the folks having children were educated at least 20 years prior to the memos existence your data are inappropriate and show nothing Jerome.

Additionally, even the wikipedia article states: 13 countries are named in the report as particularly problematic with respect to U.S. security interests: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Turkey, Nigeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Mexico, Colombia, and Brazil. These countries are projected to create 47 percent of all world population growth.

Nowhere in there do I see this policy directed at US public schools. Your conclusion is incorrect and has no relevance to the document you use for support.

I fall within the same group as the others, I do believe that we need to take steps to control our population and only have one child.

...no one has ever found a 4.5 billion year old stone artifact (at the right geological stratum) with the words "Made by God."
No Sense of Obligation by Matt Young

"Say what you will about the sweet miracle of unquestioning faith. I consider the capacity for it terrifying and vile!"
Mother Night by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.

They (Women Marines) don't have a nickname, and they don't need one. They get their basic training in a Marine atmosphere, at a Marine Post. They inherit the traditions of the Marines. They are Marines.
LtGen Thomas Holcomb, USMC
Commandant of the Marine Corps, 1943
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.06 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000