Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Conspiracy Theories
 American Fake Terror Attack?
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

JEROME DA GNOME
BANNED

2418 Posts

Posted - 07/17/2007 :  20:13:08  Show Profile Send JEROME DA GNOME a Private Message  Reply with Quote
PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS

Would a government that has lied us into two wars and is working to lie us into an attack on Iran shrink from staging "terrorist" attacks in order to remove opposition to its agenda?


Thoughts?


What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell

BigPapaSmurf
SFN Die Hard

3192 Posts

Posted - 07/18/2007 :  05:05:03   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send BigPapaSmurf a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I have a better idea, its your topic, post your own thoughts and then we'll chat.

"...things I have neither seen nor experienced nor heard tell of from anybody else; things, what is more, that do not in fact exist and could not ever exist at all. So my readers must not believe a word I say." -Lucian on his book True History

"...They accept such things on faith alone, without any evidence. So if a fraudulent and cunning person who knows how to take advantage of a situation comes among them, he can make himself rich in a short time." -Lucian critical of early Christians c.166 AD From his book, De Morte Peregrini
Go to Top of Page

Gorgo
SFN Die Hard

USA
5310 Posts

Posted - 07/18/2007 :  08:54:28   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Gorgo a Private Message  Reply with Quote
They could come up with some non-existent threat (as they did with Iran, Iraq, and others), but I doubt that they'd get help from anyone to attack someone in the U.S., or even Americans on foreign soil.

They could get help attacking some foreign spot, but I think that would be difficult to keep quiet.

I know the rent is in arrears
The dog has not been fed in years
It's even worse than it appears
But it's alright-
Jerry Garcia
Robert Hunter



Go to Top of Page

furshur
SFN Regular

USA
1536 Posts

Posted - 07/18/2007 :  09:16:10   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send furshur a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Thoughts?

You're an idiot.

Also I am an idiot for actually going to the site you indicated. I read this first line and that was as much as I needed to see.
Unless Congress immediately impeaches Bush and Cheney, a year from now the US could be a dictatorial police state at war with Iran.




If I knew then what I know now then I would know more now than I know.
Go to Top of Page

JEROME DA GNOME
BANNED

2418 Posts

Posted - 07/18/2007 :  18:29:12   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send JEROME DA GNOME a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by furshur

Thoughts?

You're an idiot.



And, I am deemed a troll?

Anyways, is this probable or even possible?


What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell
Go to Top of Page

furshur
SFN Regular

USA
1536 Posts

Posted - 07/19/2007 :  05:27:47   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send furshur a Private Message  Reply with Quote
And, I am deemed a troll?

Yes, because you are.
Anyways, is this probable or even possible?

No, of course it is not probable.

Almost anything is possible.


If I knew then what I know now then I would know more now than I know.
Go to Top of Page

JEROME DA GNOME
BANNED

2418 Posts

Posted - 07/19/2007 :  07:38:04   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send JEROME DA GNOME a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Why would Paul Craig Roberts the "father of Reaganomics" and former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration say such a thing?



What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell
Go to Top of Page

furshur
SFN Regular

USA
1536 Posts

Posted - 07/19/2007 :  10:48:15   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send furshur a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Why would Paul Craig Roberts the "father of Reaganomics" and former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration say such a thing?

Dunno... What do you think?



If I knew then what I know now then I would know more now than I know.
Go to Top of Page

JEROME DA GNOME
BANNED

2418 Posts

Posted - 07/19/2007 :  18:51:41   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send JEROME DA GNOME a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by furshur

Why would Paul Craig Roberts the "father of Reaganomics" and former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration say such a thing?

Dunno... What do you think?





He believes that it is probable.


What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell
Go to Top of Page

furshur
SFN Regular

USA
1536 Posts

Posted - 07/20/2007 :  05:20:15   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send furshur a Private Message  Reply with Quote
He believes that it is probable.

Like I said I only read the first line in the story but he said could be not probably. So I would take him at his word and say he thinks it could happen.


If I knew then what I know now then I would know more now than I know.
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.08 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000