Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Health
 Testing for drugs, a whole city at a time
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 08/21/2007 :  21:59:15  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message  Reply with Quote
There are plenty of civil liberties issues with mandatory drug testing programs. But, I think, there's no such issue with this drug testing program, even though it can test millions of people at once. Kinda cool, actually:
"It's a community urinalysis," said Caleb Banta-Green, a University of Washington drug abuse researcher who was part of the Oregon State team. The scientists presented their results Tuesday at a meeting of the American Chemical Society in Boston.



Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 08/22/2007 :  06:39:15   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by HalfMooner

There are plenty of civil liberties issues with mandatory drug testing programs. But, I think, there's no such issue with this drug testing program, even though it can test millions of people at once. Kinda cool, actually:
"It's a community urinalysis," said Caleb Banta-Green, a University of Washington drug abuse researcher who was part of the Oregon State team. The scientists presented their results Tuesday at a meeting of the American Chemical Society in Boston.



Where does Rush Limbaugh live? Ft. Lauderdale, FL, isn't it? Boy-howdy, wait 'till they test that one!





"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 08/22/2007 :  07:39:13   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message  Reply with Quote
That's a good 'un, Fil!


Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Go to Top of Page

marfknox
SFN Die Hard

USA
3739 Posts

Posted - 08/22/2007 :  08:22:03   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit marfknox's Homepage  Send marfknox an AOL message Send marfknox a Private Message  Reply with Quote
The test wouldn't be used to finger any single person as a drug user. But it would help federal law enforcement and other agencies track the spread of dangerous drugs, like methamphetamines, across the country.


Oh greeeaaaat. More ways to waste tax payers' money on this insane and useless drug war.

"Too much certainty and clarity could lead to cruel intolerance" -Karen Armstrong

Check out my art store: http://www.marfknox.etsy.com

Go to Top of Page

marfknox
SFN Die Hard

USA
3739 Posts

Posted - 08/22/2007 :  08:24:12   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit marfknox's Homepage  Send marfknox an AOL message Send marfknox a Private Message  Reply with Quote
See, this is the sort of stupid shit law enforcement have to resort to when we have Schedule 1 (banned) drugs. If they were schedule 2, we'd have more a grey market than a black market, and the law enforcement would be tracking the illegally marketed drugs from the top down, not bottom up, leading to more arrests of people who are actually important to the drug trade, opposed to impoverished and desperate nobodies.

"Too much certainty and clarity could lead to cruel intolerance" -Karen Armstrong

Check out my art store: http://www.marfknox.etsy.com

Go to Top of Page

Original_Intent
SFN Regular

USA
609 Posts

Posted - 08/22/2007 :  19:10:07   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Original_Intent a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Why the hell is the EPA involved? Studying the effects of chronic drug use by the surrounding fauna?
Go to Top of Page

Yojimbo99
New Member

USA
33 Posts

Posted - 08/23/2007 :  12:24:19   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Yojimbo99 a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by marfknox

The test wouldn't be used to finger any single person as a drug user. But it would help federal law enforcement and other agencies track the spread of dangerous drugs, like methamphetamines, across the country.


Oh greeeaaaat. More ways to waste tax payers' money on this insane and useless drug war.


My thoughts exactly, as images of the wasteful HIDTA( you know, these tools http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/hidta/overview.html ) program and the local law enforcement fighting over who has the most pot in thier piss to keep thier own local coffers filled.

It will not be so much a waste of money as it will be a means to find more ways to waste money.

It's not so much wanting to die, but controlling that moment, choosing your own way. - GG Allin
Go to Top of Page

Ricky
SFN Die Hard

USA
4907 Posts

Posted - 08/23/2007 :  13:36:23   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Ricky an AOL message Send Ricky a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Field said researchers can't calculate how many people in a town are using drugs.


I was about to defend such tests, but then I stumbled upon the above line. It would be a great way to produce statistics for sociological studies if you could find out how many people were doing what. But since you can't, I see to point to this as well.

Why continue? Because we must. Because we have the call. Because it is nobler to fight for rationality without winning than to give up in the face of continued defeats. Because whatever true progress humanity makes is through the rationality of the occasional individual and because any one individual we may win for the cause may do more for humanity than a hundred thousand who hug their superstitions to their breast.
- Isaac Asimov
Go to Top of Page

Boron10
Religion Moderator

USA
1266 Posts

Posted - 08/23/2007 :  15:54:15   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Boron10 a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Ricky

Field said researchers can't calculate how many people in a town are using drugs.


I was about to defend such tests, but then I stumbled upon the above line. It would be a great way to produce statistics for sociological studies if you could find out how many people were doing what. But since you can't, I see to point to this as well.
Yes, but you should still be able to figure out an approximation of per capita drug use. We can't calculate the number of people using drugs because that information cannot be drawn solely from a concentration value in waste water.

Of course my quick review of this program could be inadequate, rendering my impression horribly wrong.
Go to Top of Page

Ricky
SFN Die Hard

USA
4907 Posts

Posted - 08/23/2007 :  18:12:27   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Ricky an AOL message Send Ricky a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Yes, but you should still be able to figure out an approximation of per capita drug use. We can't calculate the number of people using drugs because that information cannot be drawn solely from a concentration value in waste water.


If we did know the approximation per capita, X, wouldn't it just be X * capita that gives you the number of people using drugs?

Why continue? Because we must. Because we have the call. Because it is nobler to fight for rationality without winning than to give up in the face of continued defeats. Because whatever true progress humanity makes is through the rationality of the occasional individual and because any one individual we may win for the cause may do more for humanity than a hundred thousand who hug their superstitions to their breast.
- Isaac Asimov
Go to Top of Page

Boron10
Religion Moderator

USA
1266 Posts

Posted - 08/23/2007 :  19:26:25   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Boron10 a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Ricky

If we did know the approximation per capita, X, wouldn't it just be X * capita that gives you the number of people using drugs?

No, because they would still need to know two things:
1) How much is each person using?
2) Are the waste products coming from manufacture or use?

Point (2) is more significant, I would guess.

Also, please note there is a difference between approximation per capita, and actual use. That is, if a city with 100,000 people uses 60,000 ounces of marijuana per year, you could say the approximation per capita is 0.6 ounces per year. You cannot, however, infer that 10% of the population smokes weed. For all we know, there are only 1,000 heavy pot smokers.

Once again, I could be completely mistaken about the method of this testing ....
Go to Top of Page

Ghost_Skeptic
SFN Regular

Canada
510 Posts

Posted - 08/23/2007 :  19:36:03   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Ghost_Skeptic a Private Message  Reply with Quote
If illegal drug users were more likely to piss on the ground than non-users (I suspect this would be the case), the results would be skewed in the direction of underestimating illicit drug use.

I would like to see them do this in Canada - I am curious as to how boomtowns like Calgary and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_McMurray%2C_Alberta would compare to other cites.


"You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink. / You can send a kid to college but you can't make him think." - B.B. King

History is made by stupid people - The Arrogant Worms

"The greater the ignorance the greater the dogmatism." - William Osler

"Religion is the natural home of the psychopath" - Pat Condell

"The day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus, by the supreme being as his father in the womb of a virgin, will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter" - Thomas Jefferson
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.11 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000