Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Community Forums
 General Discussion
 Close Encounters - A Family Tragedy
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

JEROME DA GNOME
BANNED

2418 Posts

Posted - 09/05/2007 :  17:59:01   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send JEROME DA GNOME a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dude

JDG said:
I am with you, I have perceived him as a loser ever since seeing this movie. It has spoiled any other movies I have seen this actor in.



Ahhh.... a peek inside the head of our resident troll... and it reveals an inability to seperate fantasy from reality.

How unsuprising.

He is a man playing a role in a science fiction movie Jerome. An actor, being paid to play a part.




Have you never associated an actor with a character?

There are many actors that can not move beyond a particular role. This is not news nor incite into my psychology.

Mark Hamill, and Harrison Ford are two examples of opposites in this regard.


What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell
Go to Top of Page

JEROME DA GNOME
BANNED

2418 Posts

Posted - 09/05/2007 :  18:01:02   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send JEROME DA GNOME a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Siberia
Keanu Reeves will always be Neo to me.
Always.



I see this:


What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell
Go to Top of Page

perrodetokio
Skeptic Friend

275 Posts

Posted - 09/18/2007 :  10:42:14   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send perrodetokio a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by chaloobi

Originally posted by perrodetokio

What you are addressing is exactly what I loved about the film. And itīs a pitty that Spielberg got so family friendly over time that heīll never do such a movie again.

Thatīs what a hero in any story does (not a hero in the "Rambo" sense). He chooses to act despite the consequences. Itīs a great movie with a great story.

Cheers!
perro de tokio
But are you sure he chose to go? Seems like the aliens infected his mind in some way with an obsessive compulsion. Is that free will?


Perhaps he didnīt choose and as you sugest, heīs infected with an obsessive compulsion.
Even if I take it like that it just adds more drama to it.

And: Why does the main character in a story have to be a goody-good-gooder who never makes mistakes? Real life people arenīt like that and even in SF or Fantasy films it makes the ficticious universe created by the author more solid and easier for the audience to forget this universeīs laws in order to accept the described one in the work being enjoyed.

Cheers
perro de tokio

"Yes I have a belief in a creator/God but do not know that he exists." Bill Scott

"They are still mosquitoes! They did not turn into whales or lizards or anything else. They are still mosquitoes!..." Bill Scott

"We should have millions of missing links or transition fossils showing a fish turning into a philosopher..." Bill Scott
Go to Top of Page

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 09/18/2007 :  17:35:23   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I thought that the Dreyfus character's obsession was dramatically highlighted by his sudden, apparently out-of-character neglect of his family. People weren't supposed to sympathize with his neglect, but see his obsession, and wonder about it. The obsession was an imperative. It wasn't his choice. Nobody could resist the imperative. That was the whole point of showing Dreyfus' familial neglect. Emotionally, this plot device made the whole first part of the movie work.

Of course, and you weren't supposed to stop and consider this part, planting such an imperative obsession in many citizens' brains was hardly a friendly, or even peaceful, act by the aliens. Nor was their abduction of people for decades.


Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Edited by - HalfMooner on 09/18/2007 17:36:46
Go to Top of Page

chaloobi
SFN Regular

1620 Posts

Posted - 09/18/2007 :  18:16:45   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send chaloobi a Yahoo! Message Send chaloobi a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by HalfMooner

I thought that the Dreyfus character's obsession was dramatically highlighted by his sudden, apparently out-of-character neglect of his family. People weren't supposed to sympathize with his neglect, but see his obsession, and wonder about it. The obsession was an imperative. It wasn't his choice. Nobody could resist the imperative. That was the whole point of showing Dreyfus' familial neglect. Emotionally, this plot device made the whole first part of the movie work.

Of course, and you weren't supposed to stop and consider this part, planting such an imperative obsession in many citizens' brains was hardly a friendly, or even peaceful, act by the aliens. Nor was their abduction of people for decades.


For all practical purposes, what happened to the Dreyfus character was an abduction. A more sinister kind, though. The kind that had him abandoning the most cherished aspects of his very existance and fly off with aliens never to be heard from again. It's like they erased some of what made him human and replaced it with the compulsion to come to them.

-Chaloobi

Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.12 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000