Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Religion
 Disturbing new case of censorship
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

BigPapaSmurf
SFN Die Hard

3192 Posts

Posted - 09/18/2007 :  12:40:42  Show Profile Send BigPapaSmurf a Private Message  Reply with Quote
http://www.wmtw.com/news/14139329/detail.html

Woman checks out books she deems offensive from library and refuses to return them. I see this becoming a national trend. Perhaps its time do de-gidions all the hotels we visit...JK

"...things I have neither seen nor experienced nor heard tell of from anybody else; things, what is more, that do not in fact exist and could not ever exist at all. So my readers must not believe a word I say." -Lucian on his book True History

"...They accept such things on faith alone, without any evidence. So if a fraudulent and cunning person who knows how to take advantage of a situation comes among them, he can make himself rich in a short time." -Lucian critical of early Christians c.166 AD From his book, De Morte Peregrini

pleco
SFN Addict

USA
2998 Posts

Posted - 09/18/2007 :  13:10:38   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit pleco's Homepage Send pleco a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Perhaps they will fine her into bankruptcy.

by Filthy
The neo-con methane machine will soon be running at full fart.
Go to Top of Page

Ricky
SFN Die Hard

USA
4907 Posts

Posted - 09/18/2007 :  16:08:27   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Ricky an AOL message Send Ricky a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I'm not certain if you can call this censorship. However, it is a disturbing case of idiocy. So the library has to take her $20 and by new copies of the book. What exactly did this accomplish?

If someone is horrified by the pictures in a sex ed book, then let's just hope they are too horrified to procreate.

Why continue? Because we must. Because we have the call. Because it is nobler to fight for rationality without winning than to give up in the face of continued defeats. Because whatever true progress humanity makes is through the rationality of the occasional individual and because any one individual we may win for the cause may do more for humanity than a hundred thousand who hug their superstitions to their breast.
- Isaac Asimov
Go to Top of Page

pleco
SFN Addict

USA
2998 Posts

Posted - 09/18/2007 :  16:45:32   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit pleco's Homepage Send pleco a Private Message  Reply with Quote
It also means that this woman had to search out and look at the pictures in the first place to deem them offensive. Hmmm.....

by Filthy
The neo-con methane machine will soon be running at full fart.
Go to Top of Page

H. Humbert
SFN Die Hard

USA
4574 Posts

Posted - 09/18/2007 :  17:06:11   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send H. Humbert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Ricky

I'm not certain if you can call this censorship. However, it is a disturbing case of idiocy. So the library has to take her $20 and by new copies of the book. What exactly did this accomplish?
Well, if the book is out of print, so that even if she reimburses the library the cost of the book they are still unable to replace it, would you consider it censorship then?

Otherwise, I agree with you. All the woman is doing is providing the library with new copies of the offending book, which I must consider a net gain for the library.


"A man is his own easiest dupe, for what he wishes to be true he generally believes to be true." --Demosthenes

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool." --Richard P. Feynman

"Face facts with dignity." --found inside a fortune cookie
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 09/18/2007 :  17:36:28   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by H. Humbert

Well, if the book is out of print...
It's $17.15 at Amazon. From the article:
Lewiston library director Rick Speer returned the check, along with a form Karkos could use to request that the book be removed from the shelves. But he said he may seek help from police if she doesn't return what she borrowed.
But the simplest solution would have been to cash the check, buy another copy of the book, and let Karkos do it again. And again. And again. It would only make the publisher slightly more likely to print more copies, and it'd keep that $20, $40, $60 (etc.) out of the hands of people with serious schemes to keep books away from kids. In other words, Karkos' scheme could have just been a waste of Karkos' time and money, and increased sales of book in question.

Hell, the fact that this got news coverage will ultimately have the opposite effect of what she wants.

Edited: but->buy

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 09/18/2007 :  18:17:19   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message  Reply with Quote
The woman is merely a thief. Sending in a check to pay for something that wasn't for sale changes nothing. And yes, in my opinion, it is censorship, even though not committed by the state. JoAn Karkos should be cited for petty theft each time she does this.

I think the nation's librarians will stand up pretty well to this kind of abuse. They have a long history of fighting censorship.


Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Edited by - HalfMooner on 09/18/2007 18:17:46
Go to Top of Page

maledoro
Skeptic Friend

66 Posts

Posted - 09/20/2007 :  11:15:03   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit maledoro's Homepage Send maledoro a Private Message  Reply with Quote
She might have stolen them because she's a pervert.


"Nothing frightens me more than religion at my door."

-John Cale
Go to Top of Page

Boron10
Religion Moderator

USA
1266 Posts

Posted - 09/20/2007 :  12:32:44   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Boron10 a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by maledoro

She might have stolen them because she's a pervert.
I have the same complaint as in this post.
Go to Top of Page

JohnOAS
SFN Regular

Australia
800 Posts

Posted - 09/20/2007 :  18:39:20   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit JohnOAS's Homepage Send JohnOAS a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Boron10

Originally posted by maledoro

She might have stolen them because she's a pervert.
I have the same complaint as in this post.

If you mean you can't see the image in maledoro's post 2 before this one, I can see it OK, and it's just a winking smiley.

An blue version of this one, with a more toothy smile.

As an aside, I think maledoro's icon is more biologically accurate. It's not an expression I use often, but the smiley wink seems to pull the corner of my mouth up on the same side as the winking eye, but maybe that's just me.

John's just this guy, you know.
Edited by - JohnOAS on 09/20/2007 18:42:37
Go to Top of Page

JEROME DA GNOME
BANNED

2418 Posts

Posted - 09/20/2007 :  18:57:51   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send JEROME DA GNOME a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by JohnOAS
It's not an expression I use often, but the smiley wink seems to pull the corner of my mouth up on the same side as the winking eye, but maybe that's just me.


I just tried the task. I also have a hard time winking in the manner of the icon.


What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 09/20/2007 :  19:09:18   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Let's criticize more biologically incorrect smileys...

is green.

has an arm that apparently can extend out from his ear canal.

And can change the shape of his skull through sheer force of will.


- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 09/20/2007 :  20:27:07   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Here is an edited, more neurologically-correct version of the winkie. I release any and all rights to it.:



[Edited again, to try to get transparency right. Failed!]


Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Edited by - HalfMooner on 09/20/2007 21:24:48
Go to Top of Page

JEROME DA GNOME
BANNED

2418 Posts

Posted - 09/20/2007 :  20:28:12   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send JEROME DA GNOME a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by HalfMooner

Here is an edited, more neurologically-correct version of the winkie. I release any and all rights to it.:




;)

What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell
Go to Top of Page

moakley
SFN Regular

USA
1888 Posts

Posted - 09/20/2007 :  21:02:11   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send moakley a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by BigPapaSmurf

Perhaps its time do de-gidions all the hotels we visit...JK
Hmmmm.

I spend about 120 nights a year in hotels rooms. Some times when I enter the room I will discover that some well intentioned person has left one in plain sight, perhaps even opened to some page. I never thought of taking the bible, but I do remove it from where it was left. I don't put it in a drawer. As you know most beds in hotel rooms are a mattress and box springs sitting some frame with solid sides. Well, you guessed it, I lift up the box springs and toss it underneath.

Am I guilty of censorship as well?

Life is good

Philosophy is questions that may never be answered. Religion is answers that may never be questioned. -Anonymous
Go to Top of Page

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 09/20/2007 :  21:12:14   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message  Reply with Quote
And here's a "Screamie" I made from Edvard Munch's "The Scream" :

Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.11 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000