|
|
|
|
Baza
New Member
United Kingdom
47 Posts |
|
|
JohnOAS
SFN Regular
Australia
800 Posts |
 Posted - 11/18/2007 : 16:23:02 [Permalink]
|
Cool, we've not got Bad Astronomy and Bad Archeology.
Any more takers?
Someone's already camped on BadPhysics.com although the .org name seems to be available.
Overlap is going to be the killer. There's already lots of good blogs and sites to make BadBiology.com (parked) somewhat redundant.
Badskeptic.com and Evilskeptic.com (go kil!) both seem to be available ATM.
Edited to add: While I am being somewhat facetious, I didn't mean to rag on the Bar Archaeology site itself. It actually looks pretty good.
|
John's just this guy, you know. |
| Edited by - JohnOAS on 11/18/2007 16:30:44 |
 |
|
|
Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist
USA
4955 Posts |
Posted - 11/18/2007 : 20:45:45 [Permalink]
|
| Unfortunately, it seems to be lacking in details. At least, what I was looking at. There is lots of material-- at least for the Biblical archaeology part-- to show examples of poor use of archaeology. So let's hope that more gets added to the page. |
|
|
|
Ricky
SFN Die Hard
USA
4907 Posts |
|
|
HalfMooner
Dingaling
Philippines
15831 Posts |
Posted - 11/19/2007 : 00:25:12 [Permalink]
|
I appreciate the links, folks. I'm very interested in "Biblical Archeology," and even did a couple of spoofs about it. When you start with the goal of digging up evidence for a the contents of a religious text, you aren't really doing science, or at least not correctly. Even if you do have a degree in archeology.
|
“Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive. |
| Edited by - HalfMooner on 11/19/2007 00:26:04 |
|
|
|
Dave W.
Info Junkie
USA
26022 Posts |
|
|
 |
|
Bad archaeology
