Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Politics
 The Patriot Act?
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

chaloobi
SFN Regular

1620 Posts

Posted - 03/31/2008 :  08:28:55  Show Profile  Send chaloobi a Yahoo! Message Send chaloobi a Private Message  Reply with Quote
As I understand it, Spitzer got nailed because of the Patriot Act - you know, the one designed to nab international terrorists so we shouldn't be worried about it? Yeah, that one. The Patriot Act requires banks to notify the FBI when money over a certain amount - I think it's $5k - is passed around in lump sum. Spitzer was passing money around like that to pay his prostititute(s). The FBI investigated his transactions and found out where the money was going and acted on that 'intelligence.'

What's Spitzer got to do with international terrorism? Nothing. I wonder if the FBI would have run this one down if it was some average business man rather than a Democratic governor of New York? Because he was such an asshole for spending a gazillion dollars on prostitutes, while at the same time he had been working as a prosecutor to go after prostitution, nobody seems to give a shit that he got nailed. But to me, this is proof positive that assurances from our government that their new powers were only going to be used to keep us safe from terrorists was a lie.

-Chaloobi

BigPapaSmurf
SFN Die Hard

3192 Posts

Posted - 03/31/2008 :  10:00:34   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send BigPapaSmurf a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Blah, blah, blah, you're a commie pinko, got it:)

Well the trasaction did send up the money laundering red flags, I see no problem with them investigating and if a secondary crime is revealed during the investigation, it should be prosecuted.

That said, *$?! the Patriot Act.

"...things I have neither seen nor experienced nor heard tell of from anybody else; things, what is more, that do not in fact exist and could not ever exist at all. So my readers must not believe a word I say." -Lucian on his book True History

"...They accept such things on faith alone, without any evidence. So if a fraudulent and cunning person who knows how to take advantage of a situation comes among them, he can make himself rich in a short time." -Lucian critical of early Christians c.166 AD From his book, De Morte Peregrini
Go to Top of Page

bngbuck
SFN Addict

USA
2437 Posts

Posted - 03/31/2008 :  14:07:54   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send bngbuck a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Chaloobi.....

Spitzer has paid and will continue to pay severe personal, political, and possibly criminal penalties for his highly lubricated zipper problem. It has done some damage to the Democrats (I currently am one), but I honestly think it will be forgotten by November.

Subliminal perception of Democrats as as sexually venal as the Rabid Republicans may remain, but I think it tends to generalize into a sort of general contempt for politicians in general. Excessive libido is present in many quarters, entertainers are usually rewarded by such publicity, politicians are damaged.

I think Obama and a Democratic Congress should rewrite the Patriot Act, rename it The Political Purge Program, greatly expand it's Gestapo-like powers, and legally restrict it's use and application solely to investigation of the malfeasance of Bush, Cheney, Rove, the entire neocon cadre and all of the Bush Administration's criminally incompetent Cabinet members and political appointees.

Police, judicial and criminal justice authority should be granted to those select liberals making up this Star Chamber, and their powers should extend to unseating criminal members of the Supreme Court!

This would be done by a totally impartial alphabetical rating. Justices with last names beginning with A and R would be summarily dismissed on grounds of unacceptable alphabetization. Justices with surnames beginning with B, G, or simple S (no c) would be automatically immune from investigation. Any justice with a K name would be subjected to intensive evaluation with prejudice, that prejudice being a strong predeliction to dismiss! Any justice with a surname starting with Sc or T would be immediately arrested, defrocked and waterboarded!

If Obama would select me head up such a commission, I would gladly accept the honor!
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.05 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000