Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Community Forums
 General Discussion
 Rush comments on black president
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

tomas
SPAMMER

1 Post

Posted - 04/22/2008 :  01:15:16  Show Profile Send tomas a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Hi, to the community. I think that it was good of Rush Limbaugh to express his views on a Black President and to prove that he is not a racist has promoted Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice as strong candidates for presidential status. I think that it was fair on the part of Rush to say about is comments on a black president. I think that we should thank him….shouldn't we?

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 04/22/2008 :  01:38:32   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Welcome to SFN, tomas.

I haven't heard much truth or wisdom from Rush Limbaugh, ever. Pretty much the opposite, in fact. Just what did he say in this instance, the creature?


Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 04/22/2008 :  03:40:32   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Hi tomas and welcome!

I don't hear a lot of Rush due to a short-tempered ulcer and am not familiar with those remarks. Could you kindly put up a link?

Race has nothing to do with qualifications -- behold what the Whitey imbecile has done in the last 7+ years -- but I do not think either Rice or Powell would be suitable, judging from their past performance in government. The same holds for Alan Keyes (ye gods!), who is clinically insane.

Much is still unknown about Obama, but thus far, he looks pretty good to me.




"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

Dude
SFN Die Hard

USA
6891 Posts

Posted - 04/22/2008 :  10:53:59   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Dude a Private Message  Reply with Quote
tomas asked:
I think that we should thank him….shouldn't we?

A link to the comments in question would be helpfull.

Limbaugh typically has nothing of value to say about anything, he just panders to his ignorant audience. (but hey, they have made him a millionaire)

So provide us those comments, then we can comment.


Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong.
-- Thomas Jefferson

"god :: the last refuge of a man with no answers and no argument." - G. Carlin

Hope, n.
The handmaiden of desperation; the opiate of despair; the illegible signpost on the road to perdition. ~~ da filth
Go to Top of Page

bngbuck
SFN Addict

USA
2437 Posts

Posted - 04/22/2008 :  12:08:22   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send bngbuck a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Tomas.....

Dude and others say...
So provide us those comments, then we can comment.

Every body reading this thread is itching to comment on Tush Limbaw's commentary on anything! So give us a link, or a reference, or copy Rush's quote verbatim, so the dam can break!
Go to Top of Page

@tomic
Administrator

USA
4607 Posts

Posted - 04/22/2008 :  12:24:14   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit @tomic's Homepage Send @tomic a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I'm not convinced Rush Limbaugh is the enlightened soul the OP claims. Any good argument won't leave out key pieces of information if they damage the conclusion.

Here's a bit of a transcript from August 22, 2007:

From the August 22 broadcast of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:

LIMBAUGH: Here's [caller] in Lake Orion, Michigan. Thank you for calling. Great to have you on the EIB Network.

CALLER: Hey, Rush. It's great to talk to you. I talked to you once before. I've been listening to you for a couple of years now, and I think I'm getting brighter, but there's a lot to be learned. I know I'm no expert in foreign affairs, but what really confuses me about the liberals is the hypocrisy when they talk about how we have no reason to be in Iraq and helping those people, but yet everybody wants us to go to Darfur. I mean, aren't we going to end up in a quagmire there? I mean, isn't it -- I don't understand. Can you enlighten me on this?

LIMBAUGH: Yeah. This is -- you're not going to believe this, but it's very simple. And the sooner you believe it, and the sooner you let this truth permeate the boundaries you have that tell you this is just simply not possible, the better you will understand Democrats in everything. You are right. They want to get us out of Iraq, but they can't wait to get us into Darfur.

CALLER: Right.

LIMBAUGH: There are two reasons. What color is the skin of the people in Darfur?

CALLER: Uh, yeah.

LIMBAUGH: It's black. And who do the Democrats really need to keep voting for them? If they lose a significant percentage of this voting bloc, they're in trouble.

CALLER: Yes. Yes. The black population.

LIMBAUGH: Right. So you go into Darfur and you go into South Africa, you get rid of the white government there. You put sanctions on them. You stand behind Nelson Mandela -- who was bankrolled by communists for a time, had the support of certain communist leaders. You go to Ethiopia. You do the same thing.

CALLER: It's just -- I can't believe it's really that simple.

LIMBAUGH: Well, see, I knew you couldn't believe it. But here's the -- here's one that's even going to be harder to believe and it is even more truthful. Could you tell me what vital national interest, [caller], is at stake in Darfur?

CALLER: Um, I don't know.

LIMBAUGH: Nothing. Zilch, zero, nada. Darfur is not attacking us. Darfur has not said they want to attack us. So they will -- same thing -- Clinton sent the U.S. military off to Bosnia. No U.S. national interest at stake. The liberals will use the military as a "meals on wheels" program. They'll send them out to help with tsunami victims. But you put the military -- you put the military in a position of defending U.S. national interest, and that's when Democrats and the liberals oppose it. And --


And what about the comments Rush made regarding Donovan McNabb?

"the media has been very desirous of a black quarterback to do well".

"the sports media, being liberals just like liberal media is elsewhere, have a desire that black quarterbacks excel and do very well so that their claims that blacks are being denied opportunity can be validated."


There's some other good information at the link before that supports a case that Rush Limbaugh is, in fact, a racist.

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2549

Those are only a few examples. There are plenty of others. That's why the vague and unsupported comments by the OP leave me entirely unconvinced that Rush Limbaugh isn't a racist.

@




Gravity, not just a good idea...it's the law!

Sportsbettingacumen.com: The science of sports betting
Go to Top of Page

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 04/22/2008 :  13:34:36   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message  Reply with Quote
That was interesting @. A completely vapid argument on Rush's part-- but what should be expect? His McNabb comment was over-the-top crazy, and suggests that Rush is delusional about this liberal media obsession.

Still, I'd be curious to read the transcript regarding tomas' original question.
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 04/22/2008 :  13:53:51   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Limbaugh is nothing more than a latter day take-off on Lord Haw Haw. He inflames without reason; he lies without purpose. His only inspiration is the huge stipend given him by his radio program and his sponsors. He is a porcine drug addict who takes Viagra to the Dominican Republic for sex holidays with children. And the Viagra wasn't even his own prescription.

Like a filarial infection, he is a parasite of a single host: the huge idiot fringe of conservative America, and like an intellectual version of that infection, he grotesquely cripples the reasoning of all who subscribe to his sewer-spawned philosophy.

Is he a racist? Hell yes he's racist, big-time. Most white trash are.

And that's the way you do links for the benefit of your readers.





"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Edited by - filthy on 04/22/2008 14:00:47
Go to Top of Page

clifton
SPAMMER

1 Post

Posted - 04/22/2008 :  21:03:26   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send clifton a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I wouldn't be arguing with Rush about the black president issue and neither with Mr. Clinton on this one. I don't think that we should thank Rush for anything but as you said about this news I believe you can also express your views in [url=www.savetheleft.com] news related discussions [/url] that will get comments on your views.

Go to Top of Page

@tomic
Administrator

USA
4607 Posts

Posted - 04/22/2008 :  23:12:00   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit @tomic's Homepage Send @tomic a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by clifton

I wouldn't be arguing with Rush about the black president issue and neither with Mr. Clinton on this one. I don't think that we should thank Rush for anything but as you said about this news I believe you can also express your views in savetheleft news related discussions that will get comments on your views.



Why should I bother? Isn't this a perfectly good place to comment and get commented back? Or is your aim just to spam? Posting something controversial, then returning with a new moniker pretending to add further comment and imploring people to visit another site to carry on the conversation is quite transparent my friend.

@

Gravity, not just a good idea...it's the law!

Sportsbettingacumen.com: The science of sports betting
Go to Top of Page

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 04/23/2008 :  05:10:35   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by @tomic

Originally posted by clifton

I wouldn't be arguing with Rush about the black president issue and neither with Mr. Clinton on this one. I don't think that we should thank Rush for anything but as you said about this news I believe you can also express your views in savetheleft news related discussions that will get comments on your views.



Why should I bother? Isn't this a perfectly good place to comment and get commented back? Or is your aim just to spam? Posting something controversial, then returning with a new moniker pretending to add further comment and imploring people to visit another site to carry on the conversation is quite transparent my friend.

@

So IP address shows (beyond the similar use of tortured grammar) that tomas=clifton?
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 04/23/2008 :  06:53:24   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
 Moderation Notice 

Okay. clifton, tomas, tormanjones and werrockjoe were all pulling the same stunt. They're gone, but will probably be back until I get so sick of it that I block their IPs.


- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 04/23/2008 :  08:26:13   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dave W.

 Moderation Notice 

Okay. clifton, tomas, tormanjones and werrockjoe were all pulling the same stunt. They're gone, but will probably be back until I get so sick of it that I block their IPs.


Yeah. And they both made the same stupid mistake in forum code when trying to plug the stupid "savetheleft" website.
Go to Top of Page

bngbuck
SFN Addict

USA
2437 Posts

Posted - 04/23/2008 :  08:42:58   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send bngbuck a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Hello, Jolly,
Well, Hello Jolly!
It's so nice to have you back where you were wrong
You look like hell, Jolly,
We can tell, Jolly,
You're still blowin', you're still snowin'
You're still smellin' strong.
We feel the room swayin'
For your mouth's playin'
One of your old fav'rite wrongs from 'way back when


So here's my crap fellas
I'm the Lord of the Gap, fellas



Promise you'll never come this way again

You think, Dave?
Go to Top of Page

bngbuck
SFN Addict

USA
2437 Posts

Posted - 04/23/2008 :  09:16:18   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send bngbuck a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Jerome.....

I get Clifton (from Man on the Moon, 1999, Jim Carrey), and werrockjoe (your friend Joe, as Warlock Joe), but you've got me with Torman Jones - maybe the Christian Rock Band?---Jones I don't connect) and tomas must be some dude named Tom that I don't know!

How are things out on the Ring-a-ding Ranch?
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 04/23/2008 :  09:42:46   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by bngbuck

You think, Dave?
No.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.45 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000