|
|
|
dimossi
Skeptic Friend
USA
141 Posts |
Posted - 07/25/2002 : 10:18:32
|
Very interesting news story from "New Scientist":
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99992589
quote:
Whether or not you believe in the paranormal may depend entirely on your brain chemistry. People with high levels of dopamine are more likely to find significance in coincidences, and pick out meaning and patterns where there are none.
Peter Brugger, a neurologist from the University Hospital in Zurich, Switzerland, has suggested before that people who believe in the paranormal often seem to be more willing to see patterns or relationships between events where skeptics perceive nothing.
To find out what could be triggering these thoughts, Brugger persuaded 20 self-confessed believers and 20 skeptics to take part in an experiment.
Brugger and his colleagues asked the two groups to distinguish real faces from scrambled faces as the images were flashed up briefly on a screen. The volunteers then did a similar task, this time identifying real words from made-up ones.
Seeing and believing
Believers were much more likely than skeptics to see a word or face when there was not one, Brugger revealed last week at a meeting of the Federation of European Neuroscience Societies in Paris. However, skeptics were more likely to miss real faces and words when they appeared on the screen.
The researchers then gave the volunteers a drug called L-dopa, which is usually used to relieve the symptoms of Parkinson's disease by increasing levels of dopamine in the brain.
Both groups made more mistakes under the influence of the drug, but the skeptics became more likely to interpret scrambled words or faces as the real thing.
That suggests that paranormal thoughts are associated with high levels of dopamine in the brain, and the L-dopa makes skeptics less sceptical. "Dopamine seems to help people see patterns," says Brugger.
Plateau effect
However, the single dose of the drug did not seem to increase the tendency of believers to see coincidences or relationships between the words and images.
That could mean that there is a plateau effect for them, with more dopamine having relatively little effect above a certain threshold, says Peter Krummenacher, one of Brugger's colleagues.
Dopamine is an important chemical involved in the brain's reward and motivation system, and in addiction. Its role in the reward system may be to help us decide whether information is relevant or irrelevant, says Franse Schenk from the University of Lausanne in Switzerland.
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." [Philip K. Dick, science-fiction author]
|
|
Lars_H
SFN Regular
Germany
630 Posts |
Posted - 07/25/2002 : 11:53:53 [Permalink]
|
Well I am personally very skeptic about this experiment. Both about the interpretation of the results they got and about the underlying assumptions.
The Skeptics were more likely to make mistakes when recognitzing patterns after the received L-Dopa. So far ,so good. But trying to interpret these results as being connected with believe in the paranormal is a bit far fetched.
I am sure, that they could have achieved the same effect by giving the test subjects alcohol or a number of other substances.
The other thing that bugs me is the part about the pattern-recognition=paranormal-believe. Just because some is more likely to connect two things does not automatically mean that he is more liekly to believe in UFOs.
Recognizing patterns where others don't seeing connections and similariteies where nobody has seen them before is one of the abilities that every resercher has to have. The part is not about seeing the patterns, even where sometimes there are none, but also how somebody filters those ideas once he has had them.
|
|
|
dimossi
Skeptic Friend
USA
141 Posts |
Posted - 07/25/2002 : 13:20:31 [Permalink]
|
Lars_H,
I agree the experiment does have it's faults. I still find the results interesting and I hope they continue more critical studies into this area.
The correlation between belief in the paranormal and finding meanings in patterns does seem to be excessive. Don't parts of IQ tests look at how well you can find patterns?
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." [Philip K. Dick, science-fiction author] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|