|
|
|
Starman
SFN Regular
Sweden
1613 Posts |
 Posted - 02/26/2003 : 06:56:17 [Permalink]
|
quote:
Originally posted by darwin alogos
Since Slater seems to have difficulty citing one my alleged lies perhaps you would care to share? Or are you just an Atomic wannabe practicing your drive by skills?
So you have a problem with my sparse contribution to your favorite threads.
Unfortunately it is rather boring to discuss a subject such as this with a reality impaired person such as your self.
You have shown no capacity for critical thinking and I don't see it as my mission here to teach you anything.
Sure you have learned a little by posting here, for example that you lacked knowledge to argue against evolution, some cool names of fallacies that you don't understand, turning of Caps Lock etc., but you still fail to grasp vital points, like skepticism, evidence, burden of proof and logic.
As I've noted before, this makes reading your post a waste of time.
BTW, as you have been so fond of appealing to authority. Compared to you (and my self on this subject) Slater is an authority. Slater reads, evaluates, compares, thinks, forms a conclusion and presents it. You on the other hand only seem to do the first.
Slaters conclusions might be wrong, but have you utterly failed to show that.
As a debater, you are a failure.
So are you a liar? I actually don't care.
Am I an Atomic wannabe? Not really. With all respect to @ I prefer to remain Starman. |
 |
|
|
darwin alogos
SFN Regular
USA
532 Posts |
Posted - 02/26/2003 : 12:49:41 [Permalink]
|
Starman: quote:
So are you a liar? I actually don't care.
Which was directly related to my question to him we he jumped for joy at chance to do some "DA"bashing by repeating Slater's slanderous charge:quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Slater
Notice I already predicted your response Slater
My goodness, you predicted that if you lied you would be called on it. You must be magic.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A fulfilled prophecy!!!
Halleluja!It seem then that both Starman and Slater could produce some proof to back up such a serious charge??? But as typical just name calling with no,nata,zilch, not one piece of evidence and yet you claim of me that [Straman]: You have shown no capacity for critical thinking...but you still fail to grasp vital points, like skepticism, evidence, burden of proof and logic....BTW, as you have been so fond of appealing to authority. Compared to you (and my self on this subject) Slater is an authority. Slater reads, evaluates, compares, thinks, forms a conclusion and presents it...Slaters conclusions might be wrong, but have you utterly failed to show that
Now would it be reasonable to conclude that since both you and Slater failed to provied any evidence to support your claim that I lied,in other words logically you failed to provide the burden of proof,when compared to Slater's other post ,when I'm involved,this is a 'pattern' ,therefore at least in this instance Both Slater and yourself fall under your own condemnation of me. |
To deny logic you must use it.To deny Jesus Existed you must throw away all your knowledge of the ancient world. To deny ID
you must refute all analogical reasoning. So the question is why deny? |
|
|
|
Slater
SFN Regular
USA
1668 Posts |
Posted - 02/26/2003 : 15:16:18 [Permalink]
|
| ...a reality impaired person... nice turn of phrase Starman. That pretty much sums it up. |
|
|
|
darwin alogos
SFN Regular
USA
532 Posts |
Posted - 02/26/2003 : 16:02:47 [Permalink]
|
Slater: quote:
a reality impaired person... nice turn of phrase Starman. That pretty much sums it up.
But it is applied to the wrong persons,i.e. You and Starman are the ones denying reality all you have to do in this instance is produce any evidence where I lied or where you (Slater) refuted one of my positions.You have failed to do either,therefore the only conclusion to be drawn is (having failed to do so) is that both of you are in denial and choose to take the low road of mudslinging and false accusations. |
To deny logic you must use it.To deny Jesus Existed you must throw away all your knowledge of the ancient world. To deny ID
you must refute all analogical reasoning. So the question is why deny? |
|
|
|
@tomic
Administrator
USA
4607 Posts |
|
|
darwin alogos
SFN Regular
USA
532 Posts |
Posted - 02/26/2003 : 19:04:02 [Permalink]
|
Atomic: quote:
As you can see, repeated blows to the head cause brain damage...
@tomic
Of corse since what you consider "blows" are merely Ad Hominems and baseless accusations it really serves to demonstrate how pathetic your positions are.You would at least think from self-proclaimed intellectuals that we could see evidence or an attempt at an argument,but alas the mighty "skeptics" are reduced to grade school antics of name calling and the proverbial "your a liar",truly pathetic. |
To deny logic you must use it.To deny Jesus Existed you must throw away all your knowledge of the ancient world. To deny ID
you must refute all analogical reasoning. So the question is why deny? |
|
|
|
@tomic
Administrator
USA
4607 Posts |
|
|
darwin alogos
SFN Regular
USA
532 Posts |
Posted - 02/26/2003 : 20:39:40 [Permalink]
|
Atomic: quote:
A liar was the best compliment I could muster after having read through your shenanigans for so long. Don't tempt me.
@tomic
Really? Then since my lying "shenanigans"[/b ] are so [b]obvious to you it should be no problem for you to cut and paste a few and present them as evidence for the reading public? |
To deny logic you must use it.To deny Jesus Existed you must throw away all your knowledge of the ancient world. To deny ID
you must refute all analogical reasoning. So the question is why deny? |
|
|
|
Slater
SFN Regular
USA
1668 Posts |
Posted - 02/26/2003 : 23:15:15 [Permalink]
|
| They are all still here. Nothing has been cut. There is nowhere for you to hide |
|
|
|
darwin alogos
SFN Regular
USA
532 Posts |
Posted - 02/27/2003 : 02:06:03 [Permalink]
|
Slater: quote:
They are all still here. Nothing has been cut. There is nowhere for you to hide
It seems your the one hiding Slater. |
To deny logic you must use it.To deny Jesus Existed you must throw away all your knowledge of the ancient world. To deny ID
you must refute all analogical reasoning. So the question is why deny? |
|
|
|
Starman
SFN Regular
Sweden
1613 Posts |
Posted - 02/27/2003 : 02:15:27 [Permalink]
|
Actually some of DA's first posts(in an Evolution forum) was something along the line "how do we measure if the ruler is bent".
So how do you make a person understand that he/she is unable to understand?
"It is impossible to defeat an ignorant man in argument."
-- William G. McAdoo
"Stupidity has a certain charm. Ignorance does not."
-- Frank Zappa
|
|
|
|
darwin alogos
SFN Regular
USA
532 Posts |
Posted - 02/27/2003 : 02:25:05 [Permalink]
|
Starman: quote:
So how do you make a person understand that he/she is unable to understand?
It might help if you clued us in as to what the hell your talking about? Just a thought. |
To deny logic you must use it.To deny Jesus Existed you must throw away all your knowledge of the ancient world. To deny ID
you must refute all analogical reasoning. So the question is why deny? |
|
|
|
Dave W.
Info Junkie
USA
26022 Posts |
Posted - 02/27/2003 : 04:48:00 [Permalink]
|
| Even though Starman's sentence would read better with the word 'which' between 'that' and 'he/she', it is obvious what's being said. Instead of asking Starman to clue us in, I'd much prefer if you spoke for yourself, DA, and didn't assume that the rest of us are as clueless as you have just admitted to being. |
- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too. |
|
|
|
Jelly Fish
New Member
46 Posts |
Posted - 02/27/2003 : 13:08:34 [Permalink]
|
heyyyyy...there was some tension there fella's...
you want to have some of what I'm having...
Jelly
floating... |
Glendower..“I can call spirits from the vasty deep.”
Hotspur..“Why, so can I, or so can any man; But will they come when you do call for them?”
Jelly.."Not a hope in hell"
adapted from Henry 1V part 1 by Mr W. Shakespeare |
|
|
|
darwin alogos
SFN Regular
USA
532 Posts |
Posted - 03/02/2003 : 10:13:02 [Permalink]
|
"BIG"DAVE W.: quote:
Instead of asking Starman to clue us in, I'd much prefer if you spoke for yourself, DA, and didn't assume that the rest of us are as clueless as you have just admitted to being.
Really Dave I've been accused of many things "on these here threads" but that's the first time I've been accused of shyness .Now I think the above record of conversations speaks for itself "Starhead" was trying to score some "brownie points" with his skeptic buddies so he did all he was capable of doing an "Atomic Drive By" you come to his defense with some more meaningless skeptical chatter and I'm here as usual speaking "for" myself.Nice try though Dave,I'lld suggest you study a little more on "The Laws Of Rational Thought" before you try again. |
To deny logic you must use it.To deny Jesus Existed you must throw away all your knowledge of the ancient world. To deny ID
you must refute all analogical reasoning. So the question is why deny? |
|
|
 |
|
Topic Locked
