Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Health
 Clones and Räelians
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 4

walt fristoe
SFN Regular

USA
505 Posts

Posted - 03/05/2003 :  14:49:16   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send walt fristoe a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Doomar


I believe the idea of human cloning is fundamentally flawed. Let me explain. Most human life arises from a desire for a couple to have a family (children). There are strong forces at work within men and women to bring this about. Sometimes the motives are wrong, of course, and some children come into the world unwelcomed by their parents. But the purposes for cloning are dubious. Consider that one motivation is to bring about human life for a purpose other than for that life to thrive, grow, and prosper in this world. It is to use that life for the sake of others, to the detriment of the cloned individual. Kind of reminds me of slavery. Is there a "need" for cloning? Is human kind unable to reproduce by natural means? Not hardly. So what's the point, other than to use a "soulless" human life, as some propose that it would be, in order to harvest the organs or other tissue. By dubbing the clone soulless, people would not be guilty about abusing the clone or killing it for "scientific" purposes. Again, a lot like slavery where "negros" were considered soulless beings, and abused by many owners.
Thus, I am troubled about the entire idea, just as I am troubled about slavery and another similar phenomena, abortion.




First of all, I'm not aware of anyone who advocates cloning an entire individual just to harvest their organs. This is not only unnecessary, but would, of course, not be ethical. If an entire human were cloned, it would be solely for the sake of reproduction, when it might be the only viable option, much as in vitro methods are currently used.

Second, who says cloned humans would be any more "soul-less" than those produced by more traditional means? Most scientists currently believe that all humans are "soul-less", cloned or not, and yet not many advocate the indiscriminate use of humans for "scientific purposes".

And besides, most human life does not arise from "a desire for a couple to have a family". Most human life arises from a desire to have sex, the family is just a by-product of our love of orgasms.

"If God chose George Bus of all the people in the world, how good could God be?"
Bill Maher
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 4 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.06 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000