Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Astronomy
 Defense and Disclosure conflict?
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Paulnib68
New Member

USA
28 Posts

Posted - 01/24/2003 :  20:54:48  Show Profile  Visit Paulnib68's Homepage  Send Paulnib68 a Yahoo! Message Send Paulnib68 a Private Message
It's no secret that many cases simply defy explanation. In fact, there is every indication that indeed, something was very much present to be reported. Radar and visual confirmations by sources such as the military or commercial airlines top the lists as credible sources. Whether or not they are reports involving alien craft is what's often claimed or implied, but the truth is left up in the air. Of course.

Should a testing of our country's air defenses take place by another nation, such as overflying our airspace to test our radar capabilities or response time;It's every bit concievable that a coverup of a sort will take place should this happen. And in fact it is known that this very thing has happend, and been engaged in by the U.S. with other countries.

It's not a good idea to let potential adversaries know your capabilities, so naturally a block of information regarding the incident may take place. Pilots will be told to keep silent, and records will be sealed.

In another scenario experimental aeronautical equipment may be spotted by civilians. Depending upon it's nature, it could very well be desired that absolutely no informaton regarding it reach open channels. And so again, secrecy is enacted.

Over time, a considerable file of such incidences may build up, and represent a morass of information that the government simply is not inclined to revisit without specific reason.

Myself I feel these are exactly the sort of things that result in documents obtained by FOIA arriving blacked out and unreadable.

Excluding the more recent files for obvious reasons, what about all the old stuff? Are official docs regarding Mogul still worth considering sensitive? Are cases involving long defunct experimental aircraft still important enough to merit secret classification? Are the files regarding early adversarial incursions into our airspace still in need of protection?

And finally, would it even be worth the effort on the part of the angencies involved to release these files? How can those who believe these files to actually represent encounters with alien craft be satisfied that they really are nothing more than the above, when the whole thing was covered in "conspiracy" to begin with?

Can they be satisifed?

The meek shall inherit the earth, but the bold will inherit the stars.

Edited by - Paulnib68 on 01/24/2003 21:04:02

NubiWan
Skeptic Friend

USA
424 Posts

Posted - 01/25/2003 :  13:42:23   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send NubiWan a Private Message
Pardon me, but what are you going on about? You have obivously taken some time and effort with your post, is it a response, a statement of position, or what?

Go to Top of Page

Paulnib68
New Member

USA
28 Posts

Posted - 01/25/2003 :  22:33:44   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Paulnib68's Homepage  Send Paulnib68 a Yahoo! Message Send Paulnib68 a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by NubiWan

Pardon me, but what are you going on about? You have obivously taken some time and effort with your post, is it a response, a statement of position, or what?



I thought it was pretty plain.

"Are official docs regarding Mogul still worth considering sensitive? Are cases involving long defunct experimental aircraft still important enough to merit secret classification? Are the files regarding early adversarial incursions into our airspace still in need of protection?

And finally, would it even be worth the effort on the part of the angencies involved to release these files?"

Are you familiar with the failure of the government to declassify a great many documents, and the pro et advocates assertions that this indicates a covering up of the "truth" about et?

What is the problem? I honestly dont see what is hard to understand about the questions. Pardon me for asking. I had this crazy idea that I could get a topic I'm interested in started.





The meek shall inherit the earth, but the bold will inherit the stars.
Edited by - Paulnib68 on 01/25/2003 22:38:58
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.06 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000