Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Politics
 The Great evil Iraq: Beginning of Pre-emptive War
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

Gorgo
SFN Die Hard

USA
5310 Posts

Posted - 03/23/2004 :  06:06:25   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Gorgo a Private Message
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2003/051503a.html for the CIA connection.

Bush I illegally invaded Iraq by ignoring the U.N. Charter's provisions which state that countries will negotiate with each other. Some of the weapons and tactics used were at least questionable.

Clinton continued the attack by making sure that the infrastructure of Iraq could not be repaired, killing hundreds of thousands of people, not to mention the other problems the sanctions and weekly bombings caused. Clinton then bombed a pharmaceutical company in Sudan, on which thousands depended, including Iraqis already impoverished and injured by war, a brutal dictator, and sanctions.

I know the rent is in arrears
The dog has not been fed in years
It's even worse than it appears
But it's alright-
Jerry Garcia
Robert Hunter



Go to Top of Page

Doomar
SFN Regular

USA
714 Posts

Posted - 03/24/2004 :  20:25:37   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Doomar's Homepage Send Doomar a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Doomar

[quote]Originally posted by Gorgo

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2003/051503a.html for the CIA connection.


Extremely interesting stuff, Gorgo. I would support a foreign policy that forbid the CIA from tampering with governments and stuck to intelligence. This overreaching of the CIA is evil and harmful. It's men playing God.

Bush I illegally invaded Iraq by ignoring the U.N. Charter's provisions which state that countries will negotiate with each other. Some of the weapons and tactics used were at least questionable.

I totally agree. If people's minds and emotions weren't clouded by 911, I don't think President Bush would have succeeded in his push for war.

Clinton continued the attack by making sure that the infrastructure of Iraq could not be repaired, killing hundreds of thousands of people, not to mention the other problems the sanctions and weekly bombings caused. Clinton then bombed a pharmaceutical company in Sudan, on which thousands depended, including Iraqis already impoverished and injured by war, a brutal dictator, and sanctions.
Thanks for clearing that up a bit. Very informative.



Mark 10:27 (NKJV) 27But Jesus looked at them and said, “With men it is impossible, but not with God; for with God all things are possible.”

www.pastorsb.com.htm
Edited by - Doomar on 03/24/2004 20:26:51
Go to Top of Page

Doomar
SFN Regular

USA
714 Posts

Posted - 03/24/2004 :  20:44:28   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Doomar's Homepage Send Doomar a Private Message
THE FOREIGN POLICY MATH OF PRESIDENT BUSH...HOW WOULD YOU GRADE HIM?
I've been giving our current foreign policy some thought and this is what I've come up with. The Bush administration seems to be engaged in a global push for the spread of American influence. Unfortunately, this push includes a preemptive war policy that allows us to attack any enemy who may harbor terrorists or participate in any terror activities, even though not directly against the U.S. These enemy nations (which may only be the current regime of a nation) are not actively attacking or threatening us at this time. If Bush W. finds a terror cell of say 200 men in one of them, he has ample reason, according to current foreign policy, to threaten this entire country to deal with these terrorists or face invasion. If this country of say, 60 million, refuses to cooperate and hand over the bad guys, Bush proposes to attack 60,000,000 plus 200, making the total of our enemy to defeat, 60,000,200. If the said terrorists flee across the border, we are left to fight a nation of 60,000,000 and not even kill all the 200 terrorists. We get maybe 50 of them. If the nation they flee to is friendly to the terrorists, the scenario begins all over. This new country of 40,000,000 plus the 150 terrorists that are left is our new enemy. Now we have a total of 100,000,150 enemies when we started with just 200 active enemy terrorists. Is my math messed up or does that seem like horrible foreign policy math? We search for 200 terrorists and come up with an additional 100,000,000 enemies. You gotta be really stupid to think this is an improvement in world affairs. Unfortunately, as crazy as this sounds, in my understanding, this is the current administrations actual foreign policy. Remember the "axis of evil" speech? If GW Bush had been president during the cold war and tried out this foreign policy, I think a bunch of us might have been toast.

Mark 10:27 (NKJV) 27But Jesus looked at them and said, “With men it is impossible, but not with God; for with God all things are possible.”

www.pastorsb.com.htm
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.06 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000