Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Creation/Evolution
 Darwin's Theory of Evolution vs. Modern Evolution
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 4

Doomar
SFN Regular

USA
714 Posts

Posted - 02/28/2004 :  23:21:55   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Doomar's Homepage Send Doomar a Private Message
[quote]Originally posted by Kil

A note to Doomar:

Your sometimes use of very large font size in bold is generally considered to be shouting in forums.
Since you claim that this thread about education and not another attempt to show the superiority of creationist claims over evolution (my ass) why shout?

I just dont' know how to use the fonts well yet...sorry

Mark 10:27 (NKJV) 27But Jesus looked at them and said, “With men it is impossible, but not with God; for with God all things are possible.”

www.pastorsb.com.htm
Go to Top of Page

Dr. Mabuse
Septic Fiend

Sweden
9688 Posts

Posted - 03/27/2004 :  17:50:15   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Dr. Mabuse an ICQ Message Send Dr. Mabuse a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Dr. Mabuse

quote:
Originally posted by Doomar
Well, Darwin's works are pretty much just what you described with only observations and not an in-depth scientific study. Simply observing several species over a short period of time and coming up with a theory on why they are as they are is not what I'd call deep science. Part of their science (original evolutionists) thought that life started from some gooey mush plasma with a very simplistic uncomplicated framework.

The same goes for Copernicus who first suggested the Heliocentric world model, and Johannes Kepler, who calculated that planetary orbits were elliptic, and designed formulae to describe it.

Today, we know that there are planetary orbits in our solar system that actually aren't elliptic. The explanation for this is much more in depth, and involves Einstein's theory of relativity.

Obviously, my post flew right over the heads.

My point was that Darwin's work was the first of it's kind. Revolutionary ideas in the biological community, just like Copernicus idea of a Heliocentric model ran contrary against main-stream religious astronomical dogma.
Later scientists has improved on Darwin's ideas, and developed it to what it is today.
Just like Johannes Kepler developed the basic mathematical formulae that describes planets elliptical orbits.

For decades, astronomers noticed that Mercury deviates somewhat from the predictions made by Kepler's (and Isaac Newton's) orbital mechanics. It wasn't until someone suggested that the explanation might relate to the curved space that Einstein's theory of relativity describes. After incorporating the theory of relativity into Kepler's and Isaac Newton's orbital mechanics, no discrepancies were found.

So, from a revolutionary idea, and "a very simplistic uncomplicated framework" as Doomar says, through the process of science we have developed a very informed view of our solar system. The same applies to Darwin's ideas, and our understanding of our biological history.

Dr. Mabuse - "When the going gets tough, the tough get Duct-tape..."
Dr. Mabuse whisper.mp3

"Equivocation is not just a job, for a creationist it's a way of life..." Dr. Mabuse

Support American Troops in Iraq:
Send them unarmed civilians for target practice..
Collateralmurder.
Go to Top of Page

Dr. Mabuse
Septic Fiend

Sweden
9688 Posts

Posted - 03/27/2004 :  17:55:30   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Dr. Mabuse an ICQ Message Send Dr. Mabuse a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Doomar
I just dont' know how to use the fonts well yet...sorry

The secret is to pay close attention to all [xxx] -tags, and [/xxx] -tags. And make sure the tags and brackets go together without stray characters in the middle of them.

Edit: And if you later find out that there is something wrong with the formatting, it's easy to go back and correct it, by editing the post.

Dr. Mabuse - "When the going gets tough, the tough get Duct-tape..."
Dr. Mabuse whisper.mp3

"Equivocation is not just a job, for a creationist it's a way of life..." Dr. Mabuse

Support American Troops in Iraq:
Send them unarmed civilians for target practice..
Collateralmurder.
Edited by - Dr. Mabuse on 03/28/2004 14:29:51
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 03/27/2004 :  20:49:13   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message
I rarely mess around with fonts, colors, and so forth. I think that my writings are more ledgable (if not more coherent) by simply using italics or bolding for emphasis. To my antique eyes, a lot of different colors and text sizes take away from the content of the message.


"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

Paladin
Skeptic Friend

USA
100 Posts

Posted - 03/30/2004 :  18:07:45   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Paladin a Private Message
And some of us won't see the colors, anyway, for we have our browsers set to our own specifications. For example, I have mine set to a black background with white or dark blue letters. I find it's much easier on the eyes that way.

Paladin
Go to Top of Page

verlch
SFN Regular

781 Posts

Posted - 04/25/2004 :  23:51:37   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send verlch an AOL message Send verlch a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Dave W.

Biological evolution is the issue. It is the theory. If you want to talk about other kinds of evolution, I suggest you state as much.

Or perhaps that is your basic confusion? A sort of Dr. Dino "Darwinism reflects how the universe or life was created" mistake?

That you see the link as being full of "errors, misconceptions, and misunderstandings" says quite a lot, since most "evolutionists" would agree with everything written there.

And why does Darwin really matter, anyway? His ideas are nearing 150 years old. While they were a basis for current thinking, science progresses as time goes by.





How do you explain that every human coming into existance would be different even if the number went into infinity!!!! How do you explain that every tree and flower is different.

And if evolution happens on a daily basis, where is your proof? Where are the hands and feet sticking out of fish or what ever. I mean you have trillions of things to look at, living no less, and you can't offer me an example to prove your point? In the fossil record you can't even find me a missing link? Yet you expect me to believe that these fossils are millions of years old? If life is so easy to create, why are your precious scientists baffled as to how the musturd seed lives?

What came first the chicken or the egg?

How do plants exist without bugs in the soil, and bugs in the soil without plants producing oxygen?

There are no atheists in foxholes

Underlying the evolutionary theory is not just the classic "stuff" of science — conclusions arrived at through prolonged observation and experimentation. Evolution is first an atheistic, materialistic world view. In other words, the primary reason for its acceptance has little to do with the evidence for or against it. Evolution is accepted because men are atheists by faith and thus interpret the evidence to cor-respond to their naturalistic philosophy.

For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. II Timothy 4:3,4

II Thess. 2:11 And for this cause God shall
send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:

You can not see the 'wind', but you can see its effect!!!!

Evolution was caused by genetic mistakes at each stage?

Radical Evolution has 500 million years to find fossils of fictional drawings of (hard core)missing links, yet they find none.

We have not seen such moral darkness since the dark ages, coencides with
teaching evolution in schools. (Moral darkness)

For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places, EPH 6:12.

"Thus, many scientists embracing naturalism find themselves in the seeming dilemma recently articulated by biochemist Franklin Harold: "We should reject, as a matter of principle, the substitution of intelligent design for the dialogue of chance and necessity [i.e., Darwinian evolution]; but we must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical system, only a variety of wishful speculations."
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 04/26/2004 :  04:12:52   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message
Oy veh!

Does anyone remember which thread it was that I and others answered every word of verlch's latest splutter, plus some? If so, please direct him to it and tell him we're still waiting on his counter evidences and citations.

Verlih old son, this drive-by business ain't hittin' on shit. When you make a statment here, you need to be prepared to defend it. Otherwise you look like an idiot, especally when you run away.


"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 04/26/2004 :  10:22:09   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message
Ok, found it.

http://www.skepticfriends.org/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=2672

Especally study Ricky's rather long post on page three. Lots of good info in it, and after you've asorbed that info, and considered your refutations, do post and we'll have a rockin' good discussion.

Uh, verlch..... are you there?


"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 04/26/2004 :  11:44:27   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message
verlch wrote:
quote:
How do you explain that every human coming into existance would be different even if the number went into infinity!!!! How do you explain that every tree and flower is different.
Because living things take their shapes due not only to genetics, but due to their environment. Besides which, with an infinite number of humans, there would be many superficial duplicates, since there aren't an infinite number of possible human looks. We don't grow to 20 feet tall, nor is our skin purple. Of course, each person experiences things differently, so there will never be two true duplicate people, but that's not something evolutionary theory argues against.
quote:
And if evolution happens on a daily basis, where is your proof? Where are the hands and feet sticking out of fish or what ever.
Considering your example is based upon a lie about what evolutionary theory tells us, any answer I give to you will likely be rejected. But, there is a species of mosquito which lives in the subway in London, which evolved from the mosquitoes which live above ground. Obviously, this occured sometime since the subway was built. In other words, in modern times.

There exist many other examples of speciation which have been observed. Do you reject them all, or are you simply ignorant of them?
quote:
If life is so easy to create, why are your precious scientists baffled as to how the musturd seed lives?
I didn't know that any scientists were baffled by mustard seeds. Why don't you show me that they are, and then maybe I'll be able to answer your question.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Ricky
SFN Die Hard

USA
4907 Posts

Posted - 04/26/2004 :  12:57:03   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Ricky an AOL message Send Ricky a Private Message
"Especally study Ricky's rather long post on page three."

Thanks Filthy


"And if evolution happens on a daily basis, where is your proof? Where are the hands and feet sticking out of fish or what ever."

Wow, alright, I'll try this again. We have fossils which should fish with:

a.) muscles in their fins
b.) lungs which could breath air
c.) finger bones in those fins

All of which are needed for fish to "walk" on land. This is a "missing" link. We have also found fossils which clearly show the transition of dinosaurs to birds, and the fact that some dinosaurs had feathers. We also have fossils which show the transition between wolf and whale, which span over a 50 million year time period. We also have fossils which show primeape to humans, I think 8 major species right now (or is it 9).

You can find pictures of any of these on the internet. Creationists (or anyone who goes against evolution) is like a smoker who doesn't think that cigars are bad for them. Just because they can't see it happening in one instant, they think its not happening at all.

Well, that was a bad comparision, because evolution is happening at this instant.

Why continue? Because we must. Because we have the call. Because it is nobler to fight for rationality without winning than to give up in the face of continued defeats. Because whatever true progress humanity makes is through the rationality of the occasional individual and because any one individual we may win for the cause may do more for humanity than a hundred thousand who hug their superstitions to their breast.
- Isaac Asimov
Go to Top of Page

tomk80
SFN Regular

Netherlands
1278 Posts

Posted - 04/26/2004 :  13:42:16   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit tomk80's Homepage Send tomk80 a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by verlch
why are your precious scientists baffled as to how the musturd seed lives?



Verlch, would you please explain to me how being baffled by something leads to a certain conclusion (such as evolution being bogus). I'd like to know, since I'm doing some research on the relationship between temperature, air pollution and blood markers, and I'm certaintly 'baffled' by some of the results I've got. It just means that I'm surprised by them, but that's the reason I am doing research. Personally, I don't see the point in researching something I already know.
But then again, if being baffled is a valid argument for a conclusion, I'd be happy to use it and get my article published . So please, enlighten me.

Tom

`Contrariwise,' continued Tweedledee, `if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.'
-Through the Looking Glass by Lewis Caroll-
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 04/26/2004 :  16:26:16   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message
Okey dokey, here's a little evolution happening right before our very eyes. When is a mouse not a mouse, and what then might it be?

quote:
FEROCIOUS MICE

The northern grasshopper mouse ambushes its prey rather than chasing it down. It tracks prey by smell. Coming upon a likely meal, it rushes suddenly upon the victim, seizing it with sharp claws and killing it with a bite to the neck. Then it devours the kill, head and neck first, and the rest until nothing is left but bone and scraps of fur.

Mary Taylor Gray


http://wildlife.state.co.us/Education/mammalsguide/grasshopper_mouse.asp

I've posted about this animal before, and I was sorta thinking of writing it up in the odd-balls thread. But it'll do here.

I recommend opening the link posted (it's short), then doing a Google for the particulars.

This is a rodent well on the road to unrodent-like speciation.


"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

tomk80
SFN Regular

Netherlands
1278 Posts

Posted - 04/26/2004 :  16:35:48   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit tomk80's Homepage Send tomk80 a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Ricky

We also have fossils which show the transition between wolf and whale, which span over a 50 million year time period. We also have fossils which show primeape to humans, I think 8 major species right now (or is it 9).


Not a wolf Ricky, a Sinonyx, order of the mesonychid, which indeed is about the size of a wolf and looks a bit like it.

quote:

You can find pictures of any of these on the internet. Creationists (or anyone who goes against evolution) is like a smoker who doesn't think that cigars are bad for them. Just because they can't see it happening in one instant, they think its not happening at all.

Well, that was a bad comparision, because evolution is happening at this instant.



I think it's quite a good comparison. Smokers also feel the small health effects (I've had a number of smokers admit to me that they didn't get as much are when they smoked), and everyone else sees (or rather) hears them. Only the bigger picture is ignored.
With evolution, we see the small effects nowadays. And creationists often don't dispute those (eventually). It's the big effect which they try to ignore.

Tom

`Contrariwise,' continued Tweedledee, `if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.'
-Through the Looking Glass by Lewis Caroll-
Go to Top of Page

Ricky
SFN Die Hard

USA
4907 Posts

Posted - 04/26/2004 :  18:51:24   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Ricky an AOL message Send Ricky a Private Message
"With evolution, we see the small effects nowadays. And creationists often don't dispute those (eventually)."

Haha, yea, I spent two months on a Creationist and finally got him to agree that mircoevolution happens.

Why continue? Because we must. Because we have the call. Because it is nobler to fight for rationality without winning than to give up in the face of continued defeats. Because whatever true progress humanity makes is through the rationality of the occasional individual and because any one individual we may win for the cause may do more for humanity than a hundred thousand who hug their superstitions to their breast.
- Isaac Asimov
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 4 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.11 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000