|
|
|
Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist
USA
4955 Posts |
 Posted - 06/23/2004 : 14:28:58 [Permalink]
|
quote:
Originally posted by Valiant Dancer
I believe the assertion is tied to two other links on the page concerning Talmudic law (demonized) and the Bible (aggrandized).
Holy shit. I looked at the bit more into their anti-semitic rants. It's fucking frightening that people think this. It's crazy! |
 |
|
|
verlch
SFN Regular
781 Posts |
Posted - 06/23/2004 : 16:24:25 [Permalink]
|
quote:
Wait a minute...I think there was an admission there that evolution exists...I mean even if the devil invented it...If it was invented it must therefore exist!
Invent the theory!!! |
What came first the chicken or the egg?
How do plants exist without bugs in the soil, and bugs in the soil without plants producing oxygen?
There are no atheists in foxholes
Underlying the evolutionary theory is not just the classic "stuff" of science — conclusions arrived at through prolonged observation and experimentation. Evolution is first an atheistic, materialistic world view. In other words, the primary reason for its acceptance has little to do with the evidence for or against it. Evolution is accepted because men are atheists by faith and thus interpret the evidence to cor-respond to their naturalistic philosophy.
For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. II Timothy 4:3,4
II Thess. 2:11 And for this cause God shall
send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
You can not see the 'wind', but you can see its effect!!!!
Evolution was caused by genetic mistakes at each stage?
Radical Evolution has 500 million years to find fossils of fictional drawings of (hard core)missing links, yet they find none.
We have not seen such moral darkness since the dark ages, coencides with
teaching evolution in schools. (Moral darkness)
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places, EPH 6:12.
"Thus, many scientists embracing naturalism find themselves in the seeming dilemma recently articulated by biochemist Franklin Harold: "We should reject, as a matter of principle, the substitution of intelligent design for the dialogue of chance and necessity [i.e., Darwinian evolution]; but we must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical system, only a variety of wishful speculations."
|
|
|
|
verlch
SFN Regular
781 Posts |
Posted - 06/23/2004 : 16:28:11 [Permalink]
|
You guys didn't click on the link did you!!!
So what now you are going to sabatage me? Your methods are cruel and destuctive! Some kindof fire burns within you Darwin thumpers....I can't quite understand where this rage comes from!!!! |
What came first the chicken or the egg?
How do plants exist without bugs in the soil, and bugs in the soil without plants producing oxygen?
There are no atheists in foxholes
Underlying the evolutionary theory is not just the classic "stuff" of science — conclusions arrived at through prolonged observation and experimentation. Evolution is first an atheistic, materialistic world view. In other words, the primary reason for its acceptance has little to do with the evidence for or against it. Evolution is accepted because men are atheists by faith and thus interpret the evidence to cor-respond to their naturalistic philosophy.
For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. II Timothy 4:3,4
II Thess. 2:11 And for this cause God shall
send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
You can not see the 'wind', but you can see its effect!!!!
Evolution was caused by genetic mistakes at each stage?
Radical Evolution has 500 million years to find fossils of fictional drawings of (hard core)missing links, yet they find none.
We have not seen such moral darkness since the dark ages, coencides with
teaching evolution in schools. (Moral darkness)
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places, EPH 6:12.
"Thus, many scientists embracing naturalism find themselves in the seeming dilemma recently articulated by biochemist Franklin Harold: "We should reject, as a matter of principle, the substitution of intelligent design for the dialogue of chance and necessity [i.e., Darwinian evolution]; but we must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical system, only a variety of wishful speculations."
|
|
|
|
verlch
SFN Regular
781 Posts |
Posted - 06/23/2004 : 16:37:52 [Permalink]
|
http://www.geocities.com/rainforest/vines/3951/noback/hatebounces.html
Heres a little article about How I feel about women like Renea! My personal opinion, I love women but I cannot stand the attitude!
It is alot easier to make women hate men, than it is to make men hate women!
Here's another artile, I didn't read it but it is feminists in action!
http://www.quotegarden.com/feminism.html
More quotes...
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wo...0,3152751.story
I guess now justifies the beheading of men working in the Middle East, because he worked at Augusta or something like that!
http://www.geocities.com/rainforest/vines/3951/mensissues/scum.html
Heres alittle tidbit of what we, as men, are looking at from some of the kindler, gentler sex!!!
[Feminism is] a socialist, anti-family, political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians. ~Pat Robertson
http://p198.ezboard.com/feudaimonia38580metaexperimentaldiscussionboard.showMessage?topicID=148.topic
Is feminism a hate movement?
http://www.gabnet.com/lit/deich3e.htm
I dunno you tell me!! It gives me a good chuckle to read these things! What do these women do all day besides sit around all angry about life! |
What came first the chicken or the egg?
How do plants exist without bugs in the soil, and bugs in the soil without plants producing oxygen?
There are no atheists in foxholes
Underlying the evolutionary theory is not just the classic "stuff" of science — conclusions arrived at through prolonged observation and experimentation. Evolution is first an atheistic, materialistic world view. In other words, the primary reason for its acceptance has little to do with the evidence for or against it. Evolution is accepted because men are atheists by faith and thus interpret the evidence to cor-respond to their naturalistic philosophy.
For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. II Timothy 4:3,4
II Thess. 2:11 And for this cause God shall
send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
You can not see the 'wind', but you can see its effect!!!!
Evolution was caused by genetic mistakes at each stage?
Radical Evolution has 500 million years to find fossils of fictional drawings of (hard core)missing links, yet they find none.
We have not seen such moral darkness since the dark ages, coencides with
teaching evolution in schools. (Moral darkness)
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places, EPH 6:12.
"Thus, many scientists embracing naturalism find themselves in the seeming dilemma recently articulated by biochemist Franklin Harold: "We should reject, as a matter of principle, the substitution of intelligent design for the dialogue of chance and necessity [i.e., Darwinian evolution]; but we must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical system, only a variety of wishful speculations."
|
| Edited by - verlch on 06/23/2004 17:18:15 |
|
|
|
verlch
SFN Regular
781 Posts |
Posted - 06/23/2004 : 17:22:26 [Permalink]
|
| I guess the moral of the story is, the more womens study courses at universites, the more you can damage the relationship of the sexes and turn more women into lesbians! And in turn make men very lonely! |
What came first the chicken or the egg?
How do plants exist without bugs in the soil, and bugs in the soil without plants producing oxygen?
There are no atheists in foxholes
Underlying the evolutionary theory is not just the classic "stuff" of science — conclusions arrived at through prolonged observation and experimentation. Evolution is first an atheistic, materialistic world view. In other words, the primary reason for its acceptance has little to do with the evidence for or against it. Evolution is accepted because men are atheists by faith and thus interpret the evidence to cor-respond to their naturalistic philosophy.
For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. II Timothy 4:3,4
II Thess. 2:11 And for this cause God shall
send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
You can not see the 'wind', but you can see its effect!!!!
Evolution was caused by genetic mistakes at each stage?
Radical Evolution has 500 million years to find fossils of fictional drawings of (hard core)missing links, yet they find none.
We have not seen such moral darkness since the dark ages, coencides with
teaching evolution in schools. (Moral darkness)
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places, EPH 6:12.
"Thus, many scientists embracing naturalism find themselves in the seeming dilemma recently articulated by biochemist Franklin Harold: "We should reject, as a matter of principle, the substitution of intelligent design for the dialogue of chance and necessity [i.e., Darwinian evolution]; but we must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical system, only a variety of wishful speculations."
|
|
|
|
Renae
SFN Regular
543 Posts |
Posted - 06/23/2004 : 17:29:02 [Permalink]
|
V, you're transparent. I'm not going to be goaded into posting personal information about myself or defending myself against your stereotypes. I'll let you keep posting, because with every post, you show what an ignorant jerk you are.
I know why you hate women like me. Because we're smart and attractive...and because we choose the good guys over the jerks.
Have a nice evening.
|
|
|
|
verlch
SFN Regular
781 Posts |
Posted - 06/23/2004 : 17:41:41 [Permalink]
|
What did I write all that stuff...Noooooooooo!! Come on lady your own American gender wrote that! I happen to love women, and just dislike the 'New Age' attitudes!
How is being a strong assertive woman like you make me want to marry a woman like you? Chances are my feelings will be hurt, my house taken and money paid monthly to women like you! So forget it, I still will stop to help you by any means necessary, but I will not allow myself to get caught up in any more serious realationships!
I've got enough problems to try and be psycotheripist for another woman. Do you take Anti-depressants Renea and if so there is a myrid of women out there that take them in this country. Your living outside reality and how you where created. Live and let learn, or just let live.
|
What came first the chicken or the egg?
How do plants exist without bugs in the soil, and bugs in the soil without plants producing oxygen?
There are no atheists in foxholes
Underlying the evolutionary theory is not just the classic "stuff" of science — conclusions arrived at through prolonged observation and experimentation. Evolution is first an atheistic, materialistic world view. In other words, the primary reason for its acceptance has little to do with the evidence for or against it. Evolution is accepted because men are atheists by faith and thus interpret the evidence to cor-respond to their naturalistic philosophy.
For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. II Timothy 4:3,4
II Thess. 2:11 And for this cause God shall
send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
You can not see the 'wind', but you can see its effect!!!!
Evolution was caused by genetic mistakes at each stage?
Radical Evolution has 500 million years to find fossils of fictional drawings of (hard core)missing links, yet they find none.
We have not seen such moral darkness since the dark ages, coencides with
teaching evolution in schools. (Moral darkness)
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places, EPH 6:12.
"Thus, many scientists embracing naturalism find themselves in the seeming dilemma recently articulated by biochemist Franklin Harold: "We should reject, as a matter of principle, the substitution of intelligent design for the dialogue of chance and necessity [i.e., Darwinian evolution]; but we must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical system, only a variety of wishful speculations."
|
|
|
|
verlch
SFN Regular
781 Posts |
Posted - 06/23/2004 : 17:44:30 [Permalink]
|
quote:
I know why you hate women like me. Because we're smart and attractive...and because we choose the good guys over the jerks.
No you sleep with the jerks and get knocked up and married to the good guy/dependable geeks that work hard. Then most of you still sleep with the jerks, and sometimes get knocked up by the jerks and then still pretend its the geek that knocked you up, so he gets stuck raising some other mans lineage!!! |
What came first the chicken or the egg?
How do plants exist without bugs in the soil, and bugs in the soil without plants producing oxygen?
There are no atheists in foxholes
Underlying the evolutionary theory is not just the classic "stuff" of science — conclusions arrived at through prolonged observation and experimentation. Evolution is first an atheistic, materialistic world view. In other words, the primary reason for its acceptance has little to do with the evidence for or against it. Evolution is accepted because men are atheists by faith and thus interpret the evidence to cor-respond to their naturalistic philosophy.
For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. II Timothy 4:3,4
II Thess. 2:11 And for this cause God shall
send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
You can not see the 'wind', but you can see its effect!!!!
Evolution was caused by genetic mistakes at each stage?
Radical Evolution has 500 million years to find fossils of fictional drawings of (hard core)missing links, yet they find none.
We have not seen such moral darkness since the dark ages, coencides with
teaching evolution in schools. (Moral darkness)
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places, EPH 6:12.
"Thus, many scientists embracing naturalism find themselves in the seeming dilemma recently articulated by biochemist Franklin Harold: "We should reject, as a matter of principle, the substitution of intelligent design for the dialogue of chance and necessity [i.e., Darwinian evolution]; but we must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical system, only a variety of wishful speculations."
|
|
|
|
Ricky
SFN Die Hard
USA
4907 Posts |
|
|
verlch
SFN Regular
781 Posts |
Posted - 06/23/2004 : 18:15:03 [Permalink]
|
That's why I added most of you and sometimes!
www.davidandgoliathtees.com/new/
Does that website work??? |
What came first the chicken or the egg?
How do plants exist without bugs in the soil, and bugs in the soil without plants producing oxygen?
There are no atheists in foxholes
Underlying the evolutionary theory is not just the classic "stuff" of science — conclusions arrived at through prolonged observation and experimentation. Evolution is first an atheistic, materialistic world view. In other words, the primary reason for its acceptance has little to do with the evidence for or against it. Evolution is accepted because men are atheists by faith and thus interpret the evidence to cor-respond to their naturalistic philosophy.
For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. II Timothy 4:3,4
II Thess. 2:11 And for this cause God shall
send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
You can not see the 'wind', but you can see its effect!!!!
Evolution was caused by genetic mistakes at each stage?
Radical Evolution has 500 million years to find fossils of fictional drawings of (hard core)missing links, yet they find none.
We have not seen such moral darkness since the dark ages, coencides with
teaching evolution in schools. (Moral darkness)
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places, EPH 6:12.
"Thus, many scientists embracing naturalism find themselves in the seeming dilemma recently articulated by biochemist Franklin Harold: "We should reject, as a matter of principle, the substitution of intelligent design for the dialogue of chance and necessity [i.e., Darwinian evolution]; but we must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical system, only a variety of wishful speculations."
|
|
|
|
Dave W.
Info Junkie
USA
26022 Posts |
Posted - 06/23/2004 : 18:24:58 [Permalink]
|
verlch wrote:quote:
What did I write all that stuff...Noooooooooo!! Come on lady your own American gender wrote that!
verlch appears to think that Pat Robertson is a woman. It's possible that Michael Wagner is a woman, but unlikely. "Zed the Ender" is definitely male, as is Celsus Boabdil. Three out of the five working links (newsday doesn't work) were written by men, along with the Pat Robertson quote, so two-thirds of your material is written by men.
Of course, it's just stupid to portray radical feminism as the norm for women, just as it's stupid to portray a womens' clinic firebomber as the norm of Christians. I say face it, verlch: you're obsessed with feminists because you want to be in that position of power, a position which you have so far failed to obtain. But, rather than admit to your own failings and try to overcome them, you just choose to blame your problems on someone else. |
- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too. |
|
|
|
verlch
SFN Regular
781 Posts |
Posted - 06/23/2004 : 18:40:05 [Permalink]
|
quote:
Of course, it's just stupid to portray radical feminism as the norm for women, just as it's stupid to portray a womens' clinic firebomber as the norm of Christians. I say face it, verlch: you're obsessed with feminists because you want to be in that position of power, a position which you have so far failed to obtain.
Why would I want that position of power, I want normal husband wife relations as prescribed in the bible. Evolution arose, and then so did feminism. Woman said, we didn't come from the hand of God, only from monkies, so I don't need to listen to God and I will equalize myself with man."
Woman said if evolution is true, than man invented the bible only to oppress women. So in order to restore some faith in American Women I will destroy evolution or anything attributing itself to it! |
What came first the chicken or the egg?
How do plants exist without bugs in the soil, and bugs in the soil without plants producing oxygen?
There are no atheists in foxholes
Underlying the evolutionary theory is not just the classic "stuff" of science — conclusions arrived at through prolonged observation and experimentation. Evolution is first an atheistic, materialistic world view. In other words, the primary reason for its acceptance has little to do with the evidence for or against it. Evolution is accepted because men are atheists by faith and thus interpret the evidence to cor-respond to their naturalistic philosophy.
For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. II Timothy 4:3,4
II Thess. 2:11 And for this cause God shall
send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
You can not see the 'wind', but you can see its effect!!!!
Evolution was caused by genetic mistakes at each stage?
Radical Evolution has 500 million years to find fossils of fictional drawings of (hard core)missing links, yet they find none.
We have not seen such moral darkness since the dark ages, coencides with
teaching evolution in schools. (Moral darkness)
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places, EPH 6:12.
"Thus, many scientists embracing naturalism find themselves in the seeming dilemma recently articulated by biochemist Franklin Harold: "We should reject, as a matter of principle, the substitution of intelligent design for the dialogue of chance and necessity [i.e., Darwinian evolution]; but we must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical system, only a variety of wishful speculations."
|
|
|
|
Dave W.
Info Junkie
USA
26022 Posts |
Posted - 06/23/2004 : 18:47:39 [Permalink]
|
verlch wrote:quote:
Why would I want that position of power, I want normal husband wife relations as prescribed in the bible.
Right: in which case you would be in the position of power. You're not now, and you haven't been, in that position before, and you blame it on women rather than your lousy attitude.quote:
Woman said if evolution is true, than man invented the bible only to oppress women.
What a load of crap. It shouldn't be too hard to find a feminist Christian woman who thinks evolution is a tool of Satan, but I don't have time right now. |
- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too. |
|
|
|
verlch
SFN Regular
781 Posts |
Posted - 06/23/2004 : 19:06:12 [Permalink]
|
quote:
Right: in which case you would be in the position of power. You're not now, and you haven't been, in that position before, and you blame it on women rather than your lousy attitude.
I rule my roost just fine thanks!! I just have to wade through a little attitude.
No I know Pat is a man on the 700 club and that he owns diamond mines in that African country where liberated American slaves started this country. Starts with an L...I kindof like Pat Robertson...
http://www.dgp.utoronto.ca/people/AnnBarbara/admin.html
We are evolving for females to have self fertilization!!! So It all makes sense now boys!!
http://www.geocities.com/rainforest/vines/3951/noback/jeansonmor2.html
http://www.geocities.com/rainforest/vines/3951/mensissues/pizzey-manhate.html
http://www.geocities.com/rainforest/vines/3951/rape.html
http://www.albatrus.org/english/church-order/women-matters/feminization_of_the_family.htm
Last but not least my stance on the bible and the feminist dogma that is shaping women in this country, not men, women...
http://www.albatrus.org/english/church-order/women-matters/can_women_govern.htm
The Order Of Things!!!! |
What came first the chicken or the egg?
How do plants exist without bugs in the soil, and bugs in the soil without plants producing oxygen?
There are no atheists in foxholes
Underlying the evolutionary theory is not just the classic "stuff" of science — conclusions arrived at through prolonged observation and experimentation. Evolution is first an atheistic, materialistic world view. In other words, the primary reason for its acceptance has little to do with the evidence for or against it. Evolution is accepted because men are atheists by faith and thus interpret the evidence to cor-respond to their naturalistic philosophy.
For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. II Timothy 4:3,4
II Thess. 2:11 And for this cause God shall
send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
You can not see the 'wind', but you can see its effect!!!!
Evolution was caused by genetic mistakes at each stage?
Radical Evolution has 500 million years to find fossils of fictional drawings of (hard core)missing links, yet they find none.
We have not seen such moral darkness since the dark ages, coencides with
teaching evolution in schools. (Moral darkness)
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places, EPH 6:12.
"Thus, many scientists embracing naturalism find themselves in the seeming dilemma recently articulated by biochemist Franklin Harold: "We should reject, as a matter of principle, the substitution of intelligent design for the dialogue of chance and necessity [i.e., Darwinian evolution]; but we must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical system, only a variety of wishful speculations."
|
| Edited by - verlch on 06/23/2004 22:05:36 |
|
|
|
Dude
SFN Die Hard
USA
6891 Posts |
Posted - 06/23/2004 : 22:54:26 [Permalink]
|
SOmebody make him stop..... his unsupported assertions are up to atleast 250.....
The guy is a complete toad, and not worth responding to any longer.
My advice, everyone just stop responding to him. He feeds on it, and obviously gets some kinda rise out of aggravating people.
just let him rant and ignore his drivel. |
Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong.
-- Thomas Jefferson
"god :: the last refuge of a man with no answers and no argument." - G. Carlin
Hope, n.
The handmaiden of desperation; the opiate of despair; the illegible signpost on the road to perdition. ~~ da filth |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Topic Locked
