Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Religion
 Aim conversation with a bigot
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

Robb
SFN Regular

USA
1223 Posts

Posted - 09/10/2004 :  11:43:10   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Robb a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Ricky

At the skeptictimes.com forum, in a post, one of the users dared me to talk to them through aim. So, I did. May not be too interesting, it wasn't far off from the normal bigots, but anyways, here is the converstation that followed:

http://www.rshadarack.com/GayMarriageConvo.txt


I first had a problem with your definition of bigot:
quote:
rshadarack (6:45:34 PM): (bigot, meaning that you think your right and everyone else is wrong, the term fits here)
Then I looked on dictionary.com and got this definition:
quote:
intolerant person: somebody who has very strong opinions, especially on matters of politics, religion, or ethnicity, and refuses to accept different views
Is this to say that it does not matter how I treat a person? I will be a bigot if I do not agree with their morals or beleifs. Is this our definition now? Does it follow that:

I think homosexuality is wrong: I'm a bigot.
I think Islam is incorrect: I'm a bigot.
I think murderers are wrong: I'm a bigot.
Skeptics think that creationists are wrong: Skeptics are bigots.

This definition scares me a bit because it does not allow for how people are treated. It is saying to me that I must agree with what anybody else thinks or I will be labled a bigot. Where am I going wrong?
Go to Top of Page

BigPapaSmurf
SFN Die Hard

3192 Posts

Posted - 09/10/2004 :  12:10:40   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send BigPapaSmurf a Private Message
Your going right, you are a bigot along with the rest of us.

A proper title would solve the problem, such as: Conversation with an anti-gay bigot.

Edit: No I am wrong because I would gladly hear proof of God and creation if only it existed. Robb would you change your positions on those subjects if presented the right info? If not then yes you are a bigot of _______.

"...things I have neither seen nor experienced nor heard tell of from anybody else; things, what is more, that do not in fact exist and could not ever exist at all. So my readers must not believe a word I say." -Lucian on his book True History

"...They accept such things on faith alone, without any evidence. So if a fraudulent and cunning person who knows how to take advantage of a situation comes among them, he can make himself rich in a short time." -Lucian critical of early Christians c.166 AD From his book, De Morte Peregrini
Edited by - BigPapaSmurf on 09/10/2004 12:15:18
Go to Top of Page

Robb
SFN Regular

USA
1223 Posts

Posted - 09/10/2004 :  14:43:00   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Robb a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by BigPapaSmurf

Your going right, you are a bigot along with the rest of us.

A proper title would solve the problem, such as: Conversation with an anti-gay bigot.

Edit: No I am wrong because I would gladly hear proof of God and creation if only it existed. Robb would you change your positions on those subjects if presented the right info? If not then yes you are a bigot of _______.

Unless someone can prove to me that God is not real, I would not change alot of my positions. However I would not treat someone unlovingly that has different beliefs than mine.
Go to Top of Page

Ricky
SFN Die Hard

USA
4907 Posts

Posted - 09/10/2004 :  17:28:54   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Ricky an AOL message Send Ricky a Private Message
Yes, your right rob, that is an inappropriate definition, but it was on the fly (remember, you don't really have time to look things up in instant messaging), so I just gave a very basic definition.

Why continue? Because we must. Because we have the call. Because it is nobler to fight for rationality without winning than to give up in the face of continued defeats. Because whatever true progress humanity makes is through the rationality of the occasional individual and because any one individual we may win for the cause may do more for humanity than a hundred thousand who hug their superstitions to their breast.
- Isaac Asimov
Go to Top of Page

Renae
SFN Regular

543 Posts

Posted - 09/10/2004 :  19:42:12   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Renae a Private Message
I think the stumbling block here is the word "wrong."

Murder is wrong, obviously. But whether homosexuality is wrong or not is debatable.

Only facts can be proven right or wrong. Everything else (everything...think about it) is interpretation, opinion, perspective, viewpoint, etc.

I can disagree, even vehemently, with someone's viewpoints; I can even be rock-solid sure of my own beliefs and opinions--all without being a bigot. Being sure of myself doesn't make me "right"; although it may make me an opinionated twit, I don't think it makes me a bigot.

JMO.
Go to Top of Page

byhisgrace88
Formerly "creation88"

USA
166 Posts

Posted - 09/10/2004 :  20:17:13   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send byhisgrace88 an AOL message Send byhisgrace88 a Private Message
I actually AM 16 years old. And I hope that even if you don't agree with me on most everything, that you consider me a rational, intelligent (relatively:) person.

My point is, the stereotype of teenagers portrayed in the media, is not the universal case. While sadly it is much of the main stream, it does not always have to be the case. I don't want to sound cocky, or as if I'm bragging, because I realise that I have MANY faults. But I have NEVER had a fight with my parents. I have obviously not done some things as cheerfully as I could have, or not been as respectful as I should have, but I have never slammed a door in the're face. I have never turned my back and walked away from them, and I certainly have never yelled at either of them.

I just wish that my fellow teens would realise what an incredible gift the're parents are. I love my parents more than anything in the world.

I hope that everyone can try to realise that it actually IS possible to enjoy you're teenagers, and have them enjoy you as well. The media tells you it's impossible, but it's not. It's really really not.


Indeed, if we consider the unblushing promises of reward and the staggering nature of the rewards promised in the Gospels, it would seem that Our Lord finds our desire, not too strong, but too weak. We are half-hearted creatures, fooling about with drink and sex and ambition when infinite joy is offered us, like an ignorant child who wants to go on making mud pies in a slum because he cannot imagine what is meant by the offer of a holiday at the sea. We are far too easily pleased.-- C.S. Lewis
Go to Top of Page

BigPapaSmurf
SFN Die Hard

3192 Posts

Posted - 09/11/2004 :  06:24:09   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send BigPapaSmurf a Private Message
creation what does that have to do with this conversation? Are you on the right thread?

"...things I have neither seen nor experienced nor heard tell of from anybody else; things, what is more, that do not in fact exist and could not ever exist at all. So my readers must not believe a word I say." -Lucian on his book True History

"...They accept such things on faith alone, without any evidence. So if a fraudulent and cunning person who knows how to take advantage of a situation comes among them, he can make himself rich in a short time." -Lucian critical of early Christians c.166 AD From his book, De Morte Peregrini
Go to Top of Page

Ricky
SFN Die Hard

USA
4907 Posts

Posted - 09/11/2004 :  07:48:41   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Ricky an AOL message Send Ricky a Private Message
I think he is referring to the conversation that happened on the last page, where we were talking about teenagers and intelligence.

Renae, I don't think homosexuality is debatable as being right or wrong. Its a personal choice each of us makes. Is it wrong to like yellow over green? Is it wrong to like the same sex over the opposite sex?

You absolutely can not apply your likes and dislikes to other people. You can't just one day decide, "I hate green, so no one can ever draw in green from now on."

Why continue? Because we must. Because we have the call. Because it is nobler to fight for rationality without winning than to give up in the face of continued defeats. Because whatever true progress humanity makes is through the rationality of the occasional individual and because any one individual we may win for the cause may do more for humanity than a hundred thousand who hug their superstitions to their breast.
- Isaac Asimov
Go to Top of Page

H. Humbert
SFN Die Hard

USA
4574 Posts

Posted - 09/11/2004 :  10:44:02   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send H. Humbert a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Ricky

I think he is referring to the conversation that happened on the last page, where we were talking about teenagers and intelligence.

Renae, I don't think homosexuality is debatable as being right or wrong. Its a personal choice each of us makes. Is it wrong to like yellow over green? Is it wrong to like the same sex over the opposite sex?

You absolutely can not apply your likes and dislikes to other people. You can't just one day decide, "I hate green, so no one can ever draw in green from now on."

But that is your opinion, that homosexuality is a matter of taste. To others, it involves a conscious rejection of God's morality. Even what science has to say about homosexuality is fairly split down the middle, some suggesting a genetic component, others suggesting it's environmental--a learned trait. (That's relevant only because the Christian idea of sin requires choice, which homosexuality could not be if it were 100% genetic.) Whether you think it right or wrong, it quite clearly is debatable. Everything is debatable, including whether or not it's right to impose our moral beliefs upon others.

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=bigot&x=0&y=0
bigot: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices

Slightly different wording than the definition provided above. I think the key words are intolerance and prejudice, which is the difference that defines the word, as opposed to simply holding an opinion strongly.


"A man is his own easiest dupe, for what he wishes to be true he generally believes to be true." --Demosthenes

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool." --Richard P. Feynman

"Face facts with dignity." --found inside a fortune cookie
Edited by - H. Humbert on 09/11/2004 10:45:57
Go to Top of Page

Ricky
SFN Die Hard

USA
4907 Posts

Posted - 09/11/2004 :  12:21:21   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Ricky an AOL message Send Ricky a Private Message
I forgot to make something clear in my last post that you did very well, that it is in fact only my opinion that homosexuality is not debatable. I make the argument that everything is debatable. So yes, in terms of us as different people, we could debate on the morals of homosexuality, but I personally think only each person can decide that for him/her self.

Why continue? Because we must. Because we have the call. Because it is nobler to fight for rationality without winning than to give up in the face of continued defeats. Because whatever true progress humanity makes is through the rationality of the occasional individual and because any one individual we may win for the cause may do more for humanity than a hundred thousand who hug their superstitions to their breast.
- Isaac Asimov
Go to Top of Page

Skyhawk
New Member

33 Posts

Posted - 09/11/2004 :  22:51:13   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Skyhawk a Private Message
I'm 18 too! Damn it, I'm a bigot! All will bow to the views of me, the egotistic, suspicious, arrogant, shoplifting teenager!!! AHHAHA!!

*cough*cough*.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.12 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000