|
|
|
verlch
SFN Regular
781 Posts |
 Posted - 12/16/2004 : 21:22:04 [Permalink]
|
Gee, the way you post here, I wonder why you're having a bad day. If you had bothered reading the post, which why I actually expect you to do that is beyond me, you would have noticed that I never called you out nor claimed I wanted to kick your ass. What I said, and I'll use small words so your tiny mind can understand it, was people on BBS's can't be found easily so they do not fear others wanting to beat them up.
Just enough already, I don't know how you can sit there and attempt to anger me and I get in trouble for trying to be funny...lol...that's beyond me...
Geez your stupid, I was saying, 'I would kick my buddies ass for saying something like that.' Doesn't mean I would ever threaten a woman. In fact if Renea or any woman, lived next door to me and called me in the middle of the night saying she thought there was a man on her property next door. I would grab my gun and be the first one over there! Like I said, I'll box anybody, its fun I like it.
I like how you can say anything you want and I get in trouble for it! I'll bet if I was an eviloutionist you would leave me alone and we wouldn't be fighting over pebbles and dirt. |
What came first the chicken or the egg?
How do plants exist without bugs in the soil, and bugs in the soil without plants producing oxygen?
There are no atheists in foxholes
Underlying the evolutionary theory is not just the classic "stuff" of science — conclusions arrived at through prolonged observation and experimentation. Evolution is first an atheistic, materialistic world view. In other words, the primary reason for its acceptance has little to do with the evidence for or against it. Evolution is accepted because men are atheists by faith and thus interpret the evidence to cor-respond to their naturalistic philosophy.
For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. II Timothy 4:3,4
II Thess. 2:11 And for this cause God shall
send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
You can not see the 'wind', but you can see its effect!!!!
Evolution was caused by genetic mistakes at each stage?
Radical Evolution has 500 million years to find fossils of fictional drawings of (hard core)missing links, yet they find none.
We have not seen such moral darkness since the dark ages, coencides with
teaching evolution in schools. (Moral darkness)
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places, EPH 6:12.
"Thus, many scientists embracing naturalism find themselves in the seeming dilemma recently articulated by biochemist Franklin Harold: "We should reject, as a matter of principle, the substitution of intelligent design for the dialogue of chance and necessity [i.e., Darwinian evolution]; but we must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical system, only a variety of wishful speculations."
|
| Edited by - verlch on 12/16/2004 21:24:46 |
 |
|
|
Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie
USA
4826 Posts |
Posted - 12/17/2004 : 08:28:29 [Permalink]
|
quote:
Originally posted by verlch
Gee, the way you post here, I wonder why you're having a bad day. If you had bothered reading the post, which why I actually expect you to do that is beyond me, you would have noticed that I never called you out nor claimed I wanted to kick your ass. What I said, and I'll use small words so your tiny mind can understand it, was people on BBS's can't be found easily so they do not fear others wanting to beat them up.
Just enough already, I don't know how you can sit there and attempt to anger me and I get in trouble for trying to be funny...lol...that's beyond me...
Geez your stupid, I was saying, 'I would kick my buddies ass for saying something like that.' Doesn't mean I would ever threaten a woman.
And this strawman arguement has what to do with my post?
Point posited: "verlch cannot argue a point with females without claiming that they somehow want to marry or produce progeny with a group or person whom you consider evil. (Darwin, terrorists, etc) "
Point you attacked: "verlch threatens women"
Difference between the two: Point posited shows rudeness towards other posters. Point you attacked shows threatening behavior.
quote:
In fact if Renea or any woman, lived next door to me and called me in the middle of the night saying she thought there was a man on her property next door. I would grab my gun and be the first one over there! Like I said, I'll box anybody, its fun I like it.
More Alpha-male dick waving. Are you done yet?
quote:
I like how you can say anything you want and I get in trouble for it! I'll bet if I was an eviloutionist you would leave me alone and we wouldn't be fighting over pebbles and dirt.
No. I can't say anything I want. I am beholden to the TOS. If I violate it, I can be warned and further disciplinary actions can be taken against me. I am not above the TOS. Whether you believe in evolution or not, critical thought processes are the operative thing we are looking to encourage. If you recall, we had a person claiming to be a champion for critical thought who accepted evolution but the members of this board pressed him to apply critical thinking. That series of conversations likewise became contentious. |
Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils
Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion |
|
|
|
verlch
SFN Regular
781 Posts |
Posted - 12/17/2004 : 09:34:19 [Permalink]
|
quote:
Originally posted by Valiant Dancer
quote:
Originally posted by verlch
Gee, the way you post here, I wonder why you're having a bad day. If you had bothered reading the post, which why I actually expect you to do that is beyond me, you would have noticed that I never called you out nor claimed I wanted to kick your ass. What I said, and I'll use small words so your tiny mind can understand it, was people on BBS's can't be found easily so they do not fear others wanting to beat them up.
Just enough already, I don't know how you can sit there and attempt to anger me and I get in trouble for trying to be funny...lol...that's beyond me...
Geez your stupid, I was saying, 'I would kick my buddies ass for saying something like that.' Doesn't mean I would ever threaten a woman.
And this strawman arguement has what to do with my post?
Point posited: "verlch cannot argue a point with females without claiming that they somehow want to marry or produce progeny with a group or person whom you consider evil. (Darwin, terrorists, etc) "
Point you attacked: "verlch threatens women"
Difference between the two: Point posited shows rudeness towards other posters. Point you attacked shows threatening behavior.
quote:
In fact if Renea or any woman, lived next door to me and called me in the middle of the night saying she thought there was a man on her property next door. I would grab my gun and be the first one over there! Like I said, I'll box anybody, its fun I like it.
More Alpha-male dick waving. Are you done yet?
quote:
I like how you can say anything you want and I get in trouble for it! I'll bet if I was an eviloutionist you would leave me alone and we wouldn't be fighting over pebbles and dirt.
No. I can't say anything I want. I am beholden to the TOS. If I violate it, I can be warned and further disciplinary actions can be taken against me. I am not above the TOS. Whether you believe in evolution or not, critical thought processes are the operative thing we are looking to encourage. If you recall, we had a person claiming to be a champion for critical thought who accepted evolution but the members of this board pressed him to apply critical thinking. That series of conversations likewise became contentious.
I would never threaten a woman, enough said. Have you come back to planet earth yet. I have had chics punch, scatch and kick me. It didn't hurt at all but I did nothing in return because she's a lady.
With all your jumping to conclusions you could write a book, VD. |
What came first the chicken or the egg?
How do plants exist without bugs in the soil, and bugs in the soil without plants producing oxygen?
There are no atheists in foxholes
Underlying the evolutionary theory is not just the classic "stuff" of science — conclusions arrived at through prolonged observation and experimentation. Evolution is first an atheistic, materialistic world view. In other words, the primary reason for its acceptance has little to do with the evidence for or against it. Evolution is accepted because men are atheists by faith and thus interpret the evidence to cor-respond to their naturalistic philosophy.
For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. II Timothy 4:3,4
II Thess. 2:11 And for this cause God shall
send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
You can not see the 'wind', but you can see its effect!!!!
Evolution was caused by genetic mistakes at each stage?
Radical Evolution has 500 million years to find fossils of fictional drawings of (hard core)missing links, yet they find none.
We have not seen such moral darkness since the dark ages, coencides with
teaching evolution in schools. (Moral darkness)
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places, EPH 6:12.
"Thus, many scientists embracing naturalism find themselves in the seeming dilemma recently articulated by biochemist Franklin Harold: "We should reject, as a matter of principle, the substitution of intelligent design for the dialogue of chance and necessity [i.e., Darwinian evolution]; but we must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical system, only a variety of wishful speculations."
|
|
|
|
Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie
USA
4826 Posts |
Posted - 12/17/2004 : 09:50:20 [Permalink]
|
quote:
Originally posted by verlch
quote:
Originally posted by Valiant Dancer
quote:
Originally posted by verlch
Gee, the way you post here, I wonder why you're having a bad day. If you had bothered reading the post, which why I actually expect you to do that is beyond me, you would have noticed that I never called you out nor claimed I wanted to kick your ass. What I said, and I'll use small words so your tiny mind can understand it, was people on BBS's can't be found easily so they do not fear others wanting to beat them up.
Just enough already, I don't know how you can sit there and attempt to anger me and I get in trouble for trying to be funny...lol...that's beyond me...
Geez your stupid, I was saying, 'I would kick my buddies ass for saying something like that.' Doesn't mean I would ever threaten a woman.
And this strawman arguement has what to do with my post?
Point posited: "verlch cannot argue a point with females without claiming that they somehow want to marry or produce progeny with a group or person whom you consider evil. (Darwin, terrorists, etc) "
Point you attacked: "verlch threatens women"
Difference between the two: Point posited shows rudeness towards other posters. Point you attacked shows threatening behavior.
quote:
In fact if Renea or any woman, lived next door to me and called me in the middle of the night saying she thought there was a man on her property next door. I would grab my gun and be the first one over there! Like I said, I'll box anybody, its fun I like it.
More Alpha-male dick waving. Are you done yet?
quote:
I like how you can say anything you want and I get in trouble for it! I'll bet if I was an eviloutionist you would leave me alone and we wouldn't be fighting over pebbles and dirt.
No. I can't say anything I want. I am beholden to the TOS. If I violate it, I can be warned and further disciplinary actions can be taken against me. I am not above the TOS. Whether you believe in evolution or not, critical thought processes are the operative thing we are looking to encourage. If you recall, we had a person claiming to be a champion for critical thought who accepted evolution but the members of this board pressed him to apply critical thinking. That series of conversations likewise became contentious.
I would never threaten a woman, enough said. Have you come back to planet earth yet. I have had chics punch, scatch and kick me. It didn't hurt at all but I did nothing in return because she's a lady.
With all your jumping to conclusions you could write a book, VD.
And again you show you cannot read for content.
I'll restate it, yet again. Try to actually read it this time.
Point posited: "verlch cannot argue a point with females without claiming that they somehow want to marry or produce progeny with a group or person whom you consider evil. (Darwin, terrorists, etc) "
Point you attacked: "verlch threatens women"
Difference between the two: Point posited shows rudeness towards other posters. Point you attacked shows threatening behavior.
I said you were incapable to argue without demonizing your opponent. You are especially rude to females.
Implying that any of my posts indicate that you are threatening women is a load of crap. I said that you were rude, not threatening towards women. |
Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils
Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion |
| Edited by - Valiant Dancer on 12/17/2004 09:52:53 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Topic Locked
