Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Astronomy
 Martian carwash?
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Starman
SFN Regular

Sweden
1613 Posts

Posted - 12/23/2004 :  04:53:54  Show Profile Send Starman a Private Message
What are the martians up to?

Who is cleaning Opportunity's solar panels?
Martians?
God?
Sylvia Brown?
Ghosts?



"The metric system is the tool of the devil! My car gets 40 rods to the hogshead and that's the way I likes it!"
-- Abe Simpson

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 12/23/2004 :  05:31:21   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message
Storm?

Apologies. I couldn't resist it...

I ahven't the faintest idea.


"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

Wendy
SFN Regular

USA
614 Posts

Posted - 12/23/2004 :  08:21:44   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Wendy a Yahoo! Message Send Wendy a Private Message
NASA's theories that it is the wind, angle of the panels, and difference in the terrain all seem pretty sound. I guess the only way to gain some certainty would be to send Spirit to the Endurance crater and see what happens.

I'm kinda hoping it's a Martian car wash.

Millions long for immortality who don't know what to do on a rainy afternoon.
-- Susan Ertz
Go to Top of Page

Paulos23
Skeptic Friend

USA
446 Posts

Posted - 12/23/2004 :  08:39:17   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Paulos23's Homepage Send Paulos23 a Private Message
The next probe we send will have to be able to tip those Martian washers.

You can go wrong by being too skeptical as readily as by being too trusting. -- Robert A. Heinlein

Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. -- Aldous Huxley
Go to Top of Page

Ricky
SFN Die Hard

USA
4907 Posts

Posted - 12/23/2004 :  11:17:39   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Ricky an AOL message Send Ricky a Private Message
I got a question. Why don't the rovers have some way of cleaning off the solar panels themselves? I would imagine that it would be fairly easy to do, and it could make them last for a much longer time. Is there a reason why they didn't do this?

Why continue? Because we must. Because we have the call. Because it is nobler to fight for rationality without winning than to give up in the face of continued defeats. Because whatever true progress humanity makes is through the rationality of the occasional individual and because any one individual we may win for the cause may do more for humanity than a hundred thousand who hug their superstitions to their breast.
- Isaac Asimov
Go to Top of Page

R.Wreck
SFN Regular

USA
1191 Posts

Posted - 12/23/2004 :  12:11:14   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send R.Wreck a Private Message
quote:
Ricky wrote:

Why don't the rovers have some way of cleaning off the solar panels themselves? I would imagine that it would be fairly easy to do, and it could make them last for a much longer time. Is there a reason why they didn't do this?


I can't speak for NASA, but I would say that every thing you add to the machine must be critical to its mission. If you add weight, you add propulsion requirements and cost. And the more complex you make it, the more things can go wrong. So they may have determined that the problem was not severe enough to warrant the added weight and complexity of a solution. Or maybe they just never thought about it.

The foundation of morality is to . . . give up pretending to believe that for which there is no evidence, and repeating unintelligible propositions about things beyond the possibliities of knowledge.
T. H. Huxley

The Cattle Prod of Enlightened Compassion
Go to Top of Page

Paulos23
Skeptic Friend

USA
446 Posts

Posted - 12/23/2004 :  12:49:15   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Paulos23's Homepage Send Paulos23 a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by R.Wreck

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana,Arial,Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Ricky wrote:

Why don't the rovers have some way of cleaning off the solar panels themselves? I would imagine that it would be fairly easy to do, and it could make them last for a much longer time. Is there a reason why they didn't do this?


I can't speak for NASA, but I would say that every thing you add to the machine must be critical to its mission. If you add weight, you add propulsion requirements and cost. And the more complex you make it, the more things can go wrong. So they may have determined that the problem was not severe enough to warrant the added weight and complexity of a solution. Or maybe they just never thought about it.
[/quote]

They did think about it, but the tosed it because of weight.

You can go wrong by being too skeptical as readily as by being too trusting. -- Robert A. Heinlein

Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. -- Aldous Huxley
Go to Top of Page

Ricky
SFN Die Hard

USA
4907 Posts

Posted - 12/23/2004 :  13:16:00   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Ricky an AOL message Send Ricky a Private Message
quote:
I can't speak for NASA, but I would say that every thing you add to the machine must be critical to its mission. If you add weight, you add propulsion requirements and cost. And the more complex you make it, the more things can go wrong. So they may have determined that the problem was not severe enough to warrant the added weight and complexity of a solution. Or maybe they just never thought about it.

They did think about it, but the tosed it because of weight.


Would you not just be able to put some sort of windshield wiper on it? How much more complex is this? How much weight? I would think it would be a very small price to pay if it means the rovers would last virtually indefinitely.

Why continue? Because we must. Because we have the call. Because it is nobler to fight for rationality without winning than to give up in the face of continued defeats. Because whatever true progress humanity makes is through the rationality of the occasional individual and because any one individual we may win for the cause may do more for humanity than a hundred thousand who hug their superstitions to their breast.
- Isaac Asimov
Go to Top of Page

Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie

USA
4826 Posts

Posted - 12/23/2004 :  13:40:27   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Valiant Dancer's Homepage Send Valiant Dancer a Private Message
They're actually homeless Martians who are looking for the change in the console of your car.

Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils

Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion
Go to Top of Page

Paulos23
Skeptic Friend

USA
446 Posts

Posted - 12/23/2004 :  13:56:30   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Paulos23's Homepage Send Paulos23 a Private Message
quote:
quote:
Originally posted by Ricky

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana,Arial,Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">I can't speak for NASA, but I would say that every thing you add to the machine must be critical to its mission. If you add weight, you add propulsion requirements and cost. And the more complex you make it, the more things can go wrong. So they may have determined that the problem was not severe enough to warrant the added weight and complexity of a solution. Or maybe they just never thought about it.

They did think about it, but the tosed it because of weight.


Would you not just be able to put some sort of windshield wiper on it? How much more complex is this? How much weight? I would think it would be a very small price to pay if it means the rovers would last virtually indefinitely.



There was a NOVA program on this. They where working under a tight schedule, so tight they ended up writing the driving and anti-colition software while it was in fight to Mars. It added to much complexity, and costed to much time to put it on. Remember, these crafts have weight figured out to the 1/1000 of an ounce. If it gets to far from the planed weight, they would have to recalculate and reporgram. Also, they where pushing it with the landing method (i.e. bouncing ball) for weight. Spirit weighed 1.5 times that of Sojoren. To much more and the paracute and air bags would not have taken it.

You can go wrong by being too skeptical as readily as by being too trusting. -- Robert A. Heinlein

Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. -- Aldous Huxley
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.09 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000