Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Community Forums
 General Discussion
 Quit smoking or lose your job
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 4

beskeptigal
SFN Die Hard

USA
3834 Posts

Posted - 01/27/2005 :  13:45:01   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send beskeptigal a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Siberia

Yeah. But see, next is the obese. Next the handicapped.

In the USA we have the American Disabilities Act that forbids discrimination against the handicapped. I'm not sure how they ruled on obesity as a handicap. I know it has come up but I don't know what the outcomes of cases were.
Go to Top of Page

Wendy
SFN Regular

USA
614 Posts

Posted - 01/27/2005 :  13:54:43   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Wendy a Yahoo! Message Send Wendy a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by moakley

When do the overweight and obese start to miss out on job opportunities because of their unhealthy life styles ?

Never I hope. What is the risk to others - that they might have a fat co-worker fall on them during a massive coronary? I often say I gain weight just watching someone eat, but I really do know better! Second-hand calories?! I realize obese people pose potentially higher insurance costs, but realistically what danger do they present to co-workers? Bill them for the difference and let them do their jobs. Would you prefer they be on welfare?

Down this path lies prejudice. How long then before it is the handicapped (as Siberia pointed out) or older workers, or workers with any tattoo (Hepatitis risk)? The list could go on and on.

Millions long for immortality who don't know what to do on a rainy afternoon.
-- Susan Ertz
Edited by - Wendy on 01/28/2005 07:26:46
Go to Top of Page

woolytoad
Skeptic Friend

313 Posts

Posted - 01/27/2005 :  16:42:29   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send woolytoad a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by beskeptigalIf a person with asthma had such an allergy then co-worker accommodation of some kind might be in order but you are talking about something exceptional.



Not as exceptional as you think:

http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_866861.html

I cannot comment on the acuracy of that, but it mirrors my own experience. A lot more people have breathing problems now.
Go to Top of Page

H. Humbert
SFN Die Hard

USA
4574 Posts

Posted - 01/27/2005 :  16:50:05   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send H. Humbert a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by woolytoad

quote:
Originally posted by beskeptigalIf a person with asthma had such an allergy then co-worker accommodation of some kind might be in order but you are talking about something exceptional.



Not as exceptional as you think:

http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_866861.html

I cannot comment on the acuracy of that, but it mirrors my own experience. A lot more people have breathing problems now.

Wooly, all that is figures of asthma sufferers. I don't think the contention was that asthma itself is rare, but that a mere hint of smoky odor lingering on someone's clothing is enough to induce an asthma attack. I've personally never heard of such a thing. If someone is that sensitive, I suppose there would have had to been a workplace ban on perfume and cologne as well.


"A man is his own easiest dupe, for what he wishes to be true he generally believes to be true." --Demosthenes

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool." --Richard P. Feynman

"Face facts with dignity." --found inside a fortune cookie
Go to Top of Page

woolytoad
Skeptic Friend

313 Posts

Posted - 01/27/2005 :  17:33:51   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send woolytoad a Private Message
I reread the first few posts. You're right.

quote:
I suppose there would have had to been a workplace ban on perfume and cologne as well.


There are some poeple who should definitely be banned from using perfume and cologne. :D
Go to Top of Page

Blindwillie
New Member

USA
8 Posts

Posted - 01/27/2005 :  17:51:46   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Blindwillie a Private Message
i posted something like this in another forum sorry for that.
Ive noticed that people who smoke two packs a day can still live a whole life, so is smoking really as bad as people say is it is. Take food for example. If you live off of mcdonalds, i dont think you will last that long.
Also i dont like how these truth adds are just focusing on how bad cigarettes are, even the adds that are against weed.
I dont think ive seen any telivised things on how bad alchol is... im new here so im sorry if my post is awful
Go to Top of Page

Boron10
Religion Moderator

USA
1266 Posts

Posted - 01/27/2005 :  18:59:17   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Boron10 a Private Message
Blindwillie! Great to see you here. (I was wondering when you'd show up)

Now, in answer:
quote:
Ive noticed that people who smoke two packs a day can still live a whole life, so is smoking really as bad as people say is it is.
Yes. Smoking really is as bad as people say it is. The problem is the risk of cancer, which is a stochastic phenomenon (that means is all about probabilities). Somebody who smokes is MUCH more likely to develop lung or throat cancer. Also, those who live with smokers are more likely to develop cancer.

Does that mean that companies have the right to fire smokers? There is a tough question. In my job, smoking is publicly discouraged, but I strongly doubt it will ever be banned; there are even certain (very minor) allowances made for smokers. This is, in my opinion, how it should be.
quote:
Take food for example. If you live off of mcdonalds, i dont think you will last that long.
I agree; however, smokers are statistically more at risk than fast food eaters (and the obese, for that matter).
quote:
I dont think ive seen any telivised things on how bad alchol is...
You know, I've wondered about that for quite some time ....
Go to Top of Page

woolytoad
Skeptic Friend

313 Posts

Posted - 01/27/2005 :  19:24:56   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send woolytoad a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by BlindwillieI dont think ive seen any telivised things on how bad alchol is...


Cultural thing? Here in Australia there are lots of anti-smoking and drunk driving ads.
Go to Top of Page

Starman
SFN Regular

Sweden
1613 Posts

Posted - 01/28/2005 :  00:35:34   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Starman a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by beskeptigal

So are you talking about an allergic reaction to some remaining particulates or chemicals emanating from the smoker's clothes or skin?

If a person with asthma had such an allergy then co-worker accommodation of some kind might be in order but you are talking about something exceptional.
"Some remaining particulates"- I see you don't spend much time around smokers.

I agree it might seem a bit exaggerated and I have never seen someone suffer an asthmatic attack from smoke filled clothes. I do know however that perfume can cause attacks so I don't find it so exceptional. Also allergy means hypersensitivity.

Anyway, it was my former boss company at the time, so it was his call.



Go to Top of Page

Starman
SFN Regular

Sweden
1613 Posts

Posted - 01/28/2005 :  01:08:40   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Starman a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Blindwillie

i posted something like this in another forum sorry for that.
Ive noticed that people who smoke two packs a day can still live a whole life, so is smoking really as bad as people say is it is. Take food for example. If you live off of mcdonalds, i dont think you will last that long.
Also i dont like how these truth adds are just focusing on how bad cigarettes are, even the adds that are against weed.
I dont think ive seen any telivised things on how bad alchol is... im new here so im sorry if my post is awful
Hi Blindwillie!
Alcohol and fast food is safe and may even provide a benefit as long as you don't abuse them. Tobacco provides nothing.
That some people manage to stay alive despite smoking does not say anything. Some non-smokers die young. You have to look at statistics to see the real effect.

Cigarettes are bad. Smoking (around other people) and buying cigarettes is immoral.
The tobacco industry get you addicted (usually when you are young) and then you have to continue to give them money. The industry use this money to get other people, especially people living in the third world, hooked. The spend some of it lobbying against laws that might hinder them to sell their products.
When you smoke you hurt the people around you. You and other people hurt contribute less to society and cost more.
Cigarettes are sold with a lie and cause more death and suffering than Osama could ever dream of.

The tobacco industry have all the drawbacks capitalism and none of its virtues.
Go to Top of Page

H. Humbert
SFN Die Hard

USA
4574 Posts

Posted - 01/28/2005 :  03:59:24   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send H. Humbert a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Starman
Smoking (around other people) and buying cigarettes is immoral.

Buying cigarettes is immoral? Come again?


"A man is his own easiest dupe, for what he wishes to be true he generally believes to be true." --Demosthenes

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool." --Richard P. Feynman

"Face facts with dignity." --found inside a fortune cookie
Go to Top of Page

Starman
SFN Regular

Sweden
1613 Posts

Posted - 01/28/2005 :  04:18:05   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Starman a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by H. Humbert

Buying cigarettes is immoral? Come again?
My opinion of course, explained in my post.
Feel free to disagree.
Go to Top of Page

Siberia
SFN Addict

Brazil
2322 Posts

Posted - 01/28/2005 :  08:30:10   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Siberia's Homepage  Send Siberia an AOL message  Send Siberia a Yahoo! Message Send Siberia a Private Message
Just out of sheer curiosity, are cigarrette tv ads banned in your country? Because they are in mine.

"Why are you afraid of something you're not even sure exists?"
- The Kovenant, Via Negativa

"People who don't like their beliefs being laughed at shouldn't have such funny beliefs."
-- unknown
Go to Top of Page

Starman
SFN Regular

Sweden
1613 Posts

Posted - 01/28/2005 :  08:41:47   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Starman a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Siberia

Just out of sheer curiosity, are cigarrette tv ads banned in your country? Because they are in mine.
Pretty sure they are (never seen any), but I'm not sure of what the law says.
Some stations broadcast from the UK.
Go to Top of Page

Wendy
SFN Regular

USA
614 Posts

Posted - 01/28/2005 :  09:30:54   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Wendy a Yahoo! Message Send Wendy a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Siberia

Just out of sheer curiosity, are cigarrette tv ads banned in your country? Because they are in mine.

Yes, they are. Here's a link to the History of Cigarette Advertising.

quote:
1971 TV cigarette advertising banned. The ban was scheduled to begin on January 1, but was delayed for one day to allow a final glut of Super Bowl ads. Fairness Doctrine anti-smoking ads also disappear. Cigarette sales begin rebounding from their four year decline. RJ Reynolds' top-selling Winston brand, which had been challenged by Philip Morris' Marlboro for most of the 60s, is particularly hard-hit. While the Marlboro cowboy translates into print advertising beautifully, Winston's only identifier was the jingle, "Winston tastes good, like a cigarette should." Winston focuses on promoting car racing, but steadily loses market share to Marlboro.

Millions long for immortality who don't know what to do on a rainy afternoon.
-- Susan Ertz
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 4 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.11 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000