Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 General Skepticism
 tk vs. A Fundamentalist Christian
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

tkster
Skeptic Friend

USA
193 Posts

Posted - 02/01/2005 :  15:20:16  Show Profile Send tkster a Private Message
I had it ready to be posted in this topic, but when I hit submit my IE shut down. I bolded the usernames and stuff and all my hard work is ruined.

So because I'm too lazy to re-type it, I'll just link it: Clicky.

tk

Edited by - tkster on 02/01/2005 15:20:35

Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie

USA
4826 Posts

Posted - 02/01/2005 :  15:34:56   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Valiant Dancer's Homepage Send Valiant Dancer a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by tkster

I had it ready to be posted in this topic, but when I hit submit my IE shut down. I bolded the usernames and stuff and all my hard work is ruined.

So because I'm too lazy to re-type it, I'll just link it: Clicky.

tk



tk, you're getting there, but.

" I think that dinosaurs and man lived together"

Not true. Mammals and dinosaurs co-existed. Precursors to man, but not Homo Sapiens (or even Homo Erectus). The CNN article refutes the common belief that early mammals did not prey on dinosaurs.

" And my idea is that the Judeo-Christian God (as I am an agnostic) does not exist due to the fact of the recent developments in science as there is no need to go back to God for the "God did it" hypothesis because the reasoning for such was to explain the complexity of life, but as we have observed, there is no need for a Creator, but rather human's intellectual pursuits of how everything got here."

Sloppy reasoning, here. Science has no bearing on religion. They are seperate frames of reference. (Physical and philosopical) You have actually cast off the idea that Creationism is valid due to scientific discoveries and arguements based on established phenomenon. I think some other motivator within you helped you choose the path of agnosticism. There is no need for a Creator's input to the mechanism of evolution. Evolution doesn't even discuss how life generated on this miserable rock we call Earth. It only discusses mechanisms of change and states that (with supporting evidence) species change over time. Abiogenesis is the study of life arising from non-life.

You are getting better and show quite a command of some basic concepts. Hopefully these small corrections will help you in further discussions. The statement concerning Creationism/belief is my own opinion based on the context in which your statements appear.


Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils

Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.05 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000