|
|
Gorgo
SFN Die Hard
USA
5310 Posts |
Posted - 02/20/2005 : 07:23:30
|
No. I haven't figured it out yet.
http://www.borrett.id.au/computing/petals-j.htm
|
I know the rent is in arrears The dog has not been fed in years It's even worse than it appears But it's alright- Jerry Garcia Robert Hunter
|
|
Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist
USA
4955 Posts |
Posted - 02/20/2005 : 09:06:12 [Permalink]
|
quote: Originally posted by Gorgo
No. I haven't figured it out yet.
http://www.borrett.id.au/computing/petals-j.htm
I did 23 tries and for it right 3 times. I was on a run of 2 for 3 and thought I'd figured it out, but then went 0-5 more and realized that I didn't. Oh well-- another distraction! |
|
|
Ricky
SFN Die Hard
USA
4907 Posts |
|
Paulos23
Skeptic Friend
USA
446 Posts |
Posted - 02/20/2005 : 14:10:06 [Permalink]
|
YA! I figured it out and became a Potentate of the Rose. Of course now I am not suppose to tell you guys how to do it.... |
You can go wrong by being too skeptical as readily as by being too trusting. -- Robert A. Heinlein
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. -- Aldous Huxley |
|
|
Dave W.
Info Junkie
USA
26022 Posts |
|
woolytoad
Skeptic Friend
313 Posts |
Posted - 02/20/2005 : 19:48:50 [Permalink]
|
It took me 10 mins to solve this one about 6 months ago. I'm an engineer (Edit: I only include this because the puzzle is supposed to show how different types of people think differently). But it was from a different website. The maintainer was a Professor and he would introduce the game to his students and say, "The smarter you are, the longer it takes for you to figure it out." I email him and get a standard response back. Turns out, he had taken the problem home to show his wife. She solved it rather quickly, it took him a whole year!
I think that there are far too many clues for this representation of the game. Easier without them I think.
Edit: The page I saw: http://personal.baker.edu/web2/cdavis09/roses.html Correction: The Professor who introduced the game to Chirs Davis (who is a Dr.) showed it to his wife and took a year to solve it. |
Edited by - woolytoad on 02/20/2005 20:02:22 |
|
|
Dave W.
Info Junkie
USA
26022 Posts |
|
Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist
USA
4955 Posts |
Posted - 02/20/2005 : 20:29:36 [Permalink]
|
Ok, so I finally got it. All told, I did about 60 rolls. One thing still confuses me: how is the name significant? That hint is still very lost on me... |
|
|
Ricky
SFN Die Hard
USA
4907 Posts |
|
Dave W.
Info Junkie
USA
26022 Posts |
|
sumnihil
New Member
USA
39 Posts |
Posted - 02/21/2005 : 01:07:32 [Permalink]
|
ok, i've gotten it. and in 17 tries, i became a potentate of the rose. i won't give away the answer, and i doubt if the following will really help anyone who wouldn't have thought of this straight away anyway, but i will tell the basics as to how i discovered it.
i looked at the source code. simple, no security, and no script files to look up. all right there in black and white, if one is able to read javascript. (i say that this won't give anything away, because surely anyone who would use this method, and had enough knowledge of javascript to use the method, would already have used it). the only reason i post is because i am wondering if this would be classified as "cheating". i submit to you the point of the entire exercise is a way to show how different people think and learn. well, i learn by taking things apart and tinkering about.
so, is my method cheating, or unethical, or merely another way of looking at the problem? i am eager to hear some responses. |
all great truths began as blasphemies. --g.b. shaw
yes, i am aware that i do not use capital letters. it is discrimination, and discrimination is wrong. period. |
|
|
woolytoad
Skeptic Friend
313 Posts |
Posted - 02/21/2005 : 04:27:02 [Permalink]
|
Cheating. The puzzle was (supposedly) orignially played with just dice. You can't really look at the source for dice. And its clearly against the rules.
But that would be a valid solution for other types of problems. |
|
|
Gorgo
SFN Die Hard
USA
5310 Posts |
Posted - 02/21/2005 : 04:32:26 [Permalink]
|
Yes, I know that some people have posted the answer on their web sites if I wanted to stretch the idea of thinking outside the box. But I do admit that if I knew how to do it I would have since you said that.
I must be a genius, because it makes no sense to me. |
I know the rent is in arrears The dog has not been fed in years It's even worse than it appears But it's alright- Jerry Garcia Robert Hunter
|
|
|
Siberia
SFN Addict
Brazil
2322 Posts |
Posted - 02/21/2005 : 04:53:03 [Permalink]
|
I can read Javascript, but I won't look. Stupid rose... |
"Why are you afraid of something you're not even sure exists?" - The Kovenant, Via Negativa
"People who don't like their beliefs being laughed at shouldn't have such funny beliefs." -- unknown
|
|
|
Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist
USA
4955 Posts |
Posted - 02/21/2005 : 05:20:18 [Permalink]
|
quote: Originally posted by sumnihil
ok, i've gotten it. and in 17 tries, i became a potentate of the rose. i won't give away the answer, and i doubt if the following will really help anyone who wouldn't have thought of this straight away anyway, but i will tell the basics as to how i discovered it.
i looked at the source code. simple, no security, and no script files to look up. all right there in black and white, if one is able to read javascript. (i say that this won't give anything away, because surely anyone who would use this method, and had enough knowledge of javascript to use the method, would already have used it). the only reason i post is because i am wondering if this would be classified as "cheating". i submit to you the point of the entire exercise is a way to show how different people think and learn. well, i learn by taking things apart and tinkering about.
so, is my method cheating, or unethical, or merely another way of looking at the problem? i am eager to hear some responses.
Oh-- it's like Kirk's solution to the no-win Kobayashi Maru scenario, which "had the virtue of having never been tried"!! |
|
|
tomk80
SFN Regular
Netherlands
1278 Posts |
Posted - 02/21/2005 : 06:08:54 [Permalink]
|
Ah, finally solved it. Now to drive my friends insane with it |
Tom
`Contrariwise,' continued Tweedledee, `if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.' -Through the Looking Glass by Lewis Caroll- |
|
|
|
|