Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Creation/Evolution
 Crock evolution, endothermic origins?
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Starman
SFN Regular

Sweden
1613 Posts

Posted - 04/20/2005 :  03:25:19  Show Profile Send Starman a Private Message
Another great article from PZ Myers on http://pharyngula.org/

Hot-blooded crocodiles?

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 04/20/2005 :  04:23:01   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message
PZ makes a good point; could be, I suppose. But I'm not comfortable with it for a couple of reasons that were mentioned in his article, notably that there is no evidence that ancient crocs were any better insulated than those of today. An uninsulated endotherm is a dead endotherm, especally an aquatic or semi-aquatic one. Also, it would have to feed constantly, and many of today's crocodilian populations, particularly some of the African nilotics, which due to their habitate, might only feed a few times a year. And crocs are not particularly deep divers, nor does any evidence beyond the heart setup demonstrate that they could have been.

Crocodilians are not particularly good swimmers, as well -- say what?! No, not when compared to endothermic animals such as pinnipeds and whales, or even otters. They are good for a quick, powerful lunge from a muddy ambush, or an extended, leasurly wallow out to sea upon occasion, but that's about it. A lot like ourselves, come to think of it...

Crocodilians have been called 'living fossils' (I hate that term!) because they show so few, basic changes from their ancient forms beyond a reduction in size.

Endothermic (maybe) dinosaurs and their pelagic kin is another matter entirely. Many if not most of these were a lot more active than crocs, and evidence is piling up that at least some of them were quite well insulated with feathers. And it is not unreasonable to speculate that some carried layers of blubber for insulation. Icthyosaurs and pliosaures(sp) for example. This would make an endothermic system into an advantage that would not much benefit a shallows-dwelling, rather seditary crocodile.

Nothing official; just my thoughts.


"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

Starman
SFN Regular

Sweden
1613 Posts

Posted - 04/20/2005 :  05:20:47   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Starman a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by filthy

PZ makes a good point; could be, I suppose. But I'm not comfortable with it for a couple of reasons that were mentioned in his article, notably that there is no evidence that ancient crocs were any better insulated than those of today. An uninsulated endotherm is a dead endotherm, especally an aquatic or semi-aquatic one. Also, it would have to feed constantly, and many of today's crocodilian populations, particularly some of the African nilotics, which due to their habitate, might only feed a few times a year.
The endothermic ancestors, if there where any, might have lived in an other environment than their exothermic decendants.

Anyway as evos cant agree on this matter Genesis must be right!

"Any religion that makes a form of torture into an icon that they worship seems to me a pretty sick sort of religion quite honestly"
-- Terry Jones
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 04/20/2005 :  07:21:06   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Starman

quote:
Originally posted by filthy

PZ makes a good point; could be, I suppose. But I'm not comfortable with it for a couple of reasons that were mentioned in his article, notably that there is no evidence that ancient crocs were any better insulated than those of today. An uninsulated endotherm is a dead endotherm, especally an aquatic or semi-aquatic one. Also, it would have to feed constantly, and many of today's crocodilian populations, particularly some of the African nilotics, which due to their habitate, might only feed a few times a year.
The endothermic ancestors, if there where any, might have lived in an other environment than their exothermic decendants.

Anyway as evos cant agree on this matter Genesis must be right!

True, and doubtless they did; Crocodilia is a very old family. But how much different? How much of a change of enviornment would it take to make a radical change from ecto to endothermia evolutionarly advantageous? Especally when the modern animal is so very good at what it does and so cloesly resembles it's ancient ancestors? Tough call, eh?

But, the tough calls are the most interesting ones, and perhaps some sort of fossil evidence will turn up to answer it (can't imagine what it might be). Until then, or until some obscure translation of Genesis turns up to explain a croc's four valve heart (not holding my breath for that one, either), we'll just have to wait and wonder.


"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.11 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000