Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Community Forums
 General Discussion
 Sleep study sheds light on nature of consciousness
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

H. Humbert
SFN Die Hard

USA
4574 Posts

Posted - 09/29/2005 :  19:25:40  Show Profile Send H. Humbert a Private Message
I thought this article was pretty interesting.

quote:
Study Reveals How Your Brain Sleeps

When we're awake, different parts of the brain use chemicals and nerve cells to communicate constantly across the entire network, similar to the perpetual flow of data between all the different computers, routers and servers that make up the Internet.

In the deepest part of sleep, however, the various nodes of your cranial Internet all lose their connections.

"The brain breaks down into little islands that can't talk to one another," said study leader Giulio Tononi of the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

[...]

Consciousness has long mystified scientists. The new finding suggests that it depends on the brain's ability to integrate information, Tononi says.

"A man is his own easiest dupe, for what he wishes to be true he generally believes to be true." --Demosthenes

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool." --Richard P. Feynman

"Face facts with dignity." --found inside a fortune cookie

Edited by - H. Humbert on 09/29/2005 19:42:31

pleco
SFN Addict

USA
2998 Posts

Posted - 09/29/2005 :  20:25:18   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit pleco's Homepage Send pleco a Private Message
I thought I read somewhere that consciousness would never be explained by science....fortunately science doesn't know when to quit trying.

by Filthy
The neo-con methane machine will soon be running at full fart.
Go to Top of Page

Dude
SFN Die Hard

USA
6891 Posts

Posted - 09/29/2005 :  21:05:50   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Dude a Private Message
quote:
I thought I read somewhere that consciousness would never be explained by science


It has always been in the category of "hard" questions.

Very interesting article. I find the topic of consciousness, in general, to be pretty fascinating.


Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong.
-- Thomas Jefferson

"god :: the last refuge of a man with no answers and no argument." - G. Carlin

Hope, n.
The handmaiden of desperation; the opiate of despair; the illegible signpost on the road to perdition. ~~ da filth
Go to Top of Page

H. Humbert
SFN Die Hard

USA
4574 Posts

Posted - 09/29/2005 :  22:08:42   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send H. Humbert a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Dude

quote:
I thought I read somewhere that consciousness would never be explained by science


It has always been in the category of "hard" questions.

I'm pretty sure he means he read it in one markie's posts.

Yeah, well I for one was disturbed the article never explicitly mentioned that non-material sources for consciousness have not yet been ruled out. I mean, that's just flat out naturalistic bias, isn't it? It is still quite possible that consciousness is caused by a non-material energy, or "soul," that leaves your body and zips around the cosmos whenever your body falls asleep.

I just know this intuitively btw.


"A man is his own easiest dupe, for what he wishes to be true he generally believes to be true." --Demosthenes

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool." --Richard P. Feynman

"Face facts with dignity." --found inside a fortune cookie
Edited by - H. Humbert on 09/29/2005 22:13:16
Go to Top of Page

Dude
SFN Die Hard

USA
6891 Posts

Posted - 09/30/2005 :  01:00:14   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Dude a Private Message
quote:
I'm pretty sure he means he read it in one markie's posts.

Yeah, well I for one was disturbed the article never explicitly mentioned that non-material sources for consciousness have not yet been ruled out. I mean, that's just flat out naturalistic bias, isn't it? It is still quite possible that consciousness is caused by a non-material energy, or "soul," that leaves your body and zips around the cosmos whenever your body falls asleep.



Oh yeah, markie-logic. My bad.

I just read the Science paper, and yeah, they totally never mention that those pesky "non-material sources" have not been ruled out.


Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong.
-- Thomas Jefferson

"god :: the last refuge of a man with no answers and no argument." - G. Carlin

Hope, n.
The handmaiden of desperation; the opiate of despair; the illegible signpost on the road to perdition. ~~ da filth
Go to Top of Page

markie
Skeptic Friend

Canada
356 Posts

Posted - 09/30/2005 :  20:12:44   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send markie a Private Message
Really guys, please don't make me have to visit the Community Forums to keep you in line. :o

HH it's nice to see your sense of intuition growing.

Consciousness remains unexplained, of course. Oh sure it is materially *correlated* to the integration of information sharing in the brain. I intuitively knew that, previously. :)

When massive computer networks which share information don't achieve consciousness, don't say I didn't tell you in advance.
Even when incredible quantum computers and their networks are realized, and yet even they don't achieve consciousness, please think of me.

Biological life and mind and consciousness depends on specific material dynamics and configuration in order to achive a working interface with the mind-spirit fields established by local-Deity, and which enable the phenomena of life and mind and consciousness to exist in the first place. Oh, the freebies you guys get.

Mark

Go to Top of Page

H. Humbert
SFN Die Hard

USA
4574 Posts

Posted - 09/30/2005 :  20:34:33   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send H. Humbert a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by markie
Biological life and mind and consciousness depends on specific material dynamics and configuration in order to achive a working interface with the mind-spirit fields established by local-Deity, and which enable the phenomena of life and mind and consciousness to exist in the first place.
I'm continuously amazed that you can say stuff like this with a straight face. "Mind-spirit fields?" Really?

Markie, you should start a new religion. You spout this tripe with such conviction that you're bound to suck in a few gullible, directionless people. They'll never question how you alone are able to "know" any of this. Not like us, of course.


"A man is his own easiest dupe, for what he wishes to be true he generally believes to be true." --Demosthenes

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool." --Richard P. Feynman

"Face facts with dignity." --found inside a fortune cookie
Edited by - H. Humbert on 09/30/2005 20:36:21
Go to Top of Page

CourseKnot
Skeptic Friend

USA
82 Posts

Posted - 10/01/2005 :  05:31:03   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send CourseKnot a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by markie


Biological life and mind and consciousness depends on specific material dynamics and configuration in order to achive a working interface with the mind-spirit fields established by local-Deity, and which enable the phenomena of life and mind and consciousness to exist in the first place. Oh, the freebies you guys get.

Mark





I would like to read up on this Mark. Got any links to help explain what your claiming?

Just flying through space with the rest of you...
Go to Top of Page

Siberia
SFN Addict

Brazil
2322 Posts

Posted - 10/01/2005 :  07:46:34   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Siberia's Homepage  Send Siberia an AOL message  Send Siberia a Yahoo! Message Send Siberia a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by markie

Really guys, please don't make me have to visit the Community Forums to keep you in line. :o

HH it's nice to see your sense of intuition growing.

Consciousness remains unexplained, of course. Oh sure it is materially *correlated* to the integration of information sharing in the brain. I intuitively knew that, previously. :)

When massive computer networks which share information don't achieve consciousness, don't say I didn't tell you in advance.
Even when incredible quantum computers and their networks are realized, and yet even they don't achieve consciousness, please think of me.

Biological life and mind and consciousness depends on specific material dynamics and configuration in order to achive a working interface with the mind-spirit fields established by local-Deity, and which enable the phenomena of life and mind and consciousness to exist in the first place. Oh, the freebies you guys get.

Mark




And of course that's just random philosophical banter (and therefore, entirely subjective and not at all proved 'true' or 'false') until you can prove any of those things ('mind-spirit fields'? Wth is that?) exist.

"Why are you afraid of something you're not even sure exists?"
- The Kovenant, Via Negativa

"People who don't like their beliefs being laughed at shouldn't have such funny beliefs."
-- unknown
Go to Top of Page

Subjectmatter
Skeptic Friend

173 Posts

Posted - 10/01/2005 :  11:02:22   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Subjectmatter a Private Message
Markies odd ramblings aside, there is an element of truth to the statement that "consciousness can never be explained by science" (depending of what you mean by consciousness".

While behaviour can and will be explained by science there is an element to the idea of consciousness which is simply does not exist in the scientists conceptual system, this is precisely the idea of a subject.

As an example, scientifically we can explain that different colour are different wavelegths of light absorbed by the retina which sends various electrochemical signals to the brain which alters its structure accordingly and the the body follows suit. This cannot explain how these signals become the qualitative sensation of 'red', because there is nothing to percievein this relation.

Simply put: one cannot observe the act of observation. Wittgenstein made a rather nice analogy between the active subject and the eye, the eye defines the visual field but is not in the visual field.


This is certainly not to say that one can never build something which is conscious. People do it all the time; the tools required are two people of opposite genders and a couple of years of nurturing. Also food.
If this process can occur in nature, then it can be replicated under slightly different circustances by a scientist; perhaps in the form of a conscious computer.

Sibling Atom Bomb of Couteous Debate
Go to Top of Page

marfknox
SFN Die Hard

USA
3739 Posts

Posted - 10/01/2005 :  14:12:48   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit marfknox's Homepage  Send marfknox an AOL message Send marfknox a Private Message
I thought I read somewhere that consciousness would never be explained by science....fortunately science doesn't know when to quit trying.

I was going to say pretty much what Subjectmatter just said. It isn't so much that consciousness can be explained by science, but that consciousness is impossible to identify (so far, at least.) We know other humans are conscious only because we assume since we're all the same animal, and we each know we have consciousness ourselves, that other people who behave like us must also be conscious.

To think about it in the abstract, we have to try to imagine aliens who evolved on a totally different planet in a totally different way from us, and then ponder if a.) something could behave as if it had a similar type of consciousness as humans, but somehow wasn't actually conscious, and b.) if something could be conscious but behave totally differently from the way humans act because of their consciousness.

Ray Kurtzweil deals with this issue in his book "The Age of Spritual Machines". He's convinced that AI will reach consciousness. He acknowledges that even if AI get to the point of behaving as if they are conscious, we won't be able to know if they really are conscious. But he also says that given that we can't know, we should act as if they are since it is ethically better to give a seemingly conscious being the benefit of the doubt.

"Too much certainty and clarity could lead to cruel intolerance" -Karen Armstrong

Check out my art store: http://www.marfknox.etsy.com

Edited by - marfknox on 10/01/2005 14:13:31
Go to Top of Page

ronnywhite
SFN Regular

501 Posts

Posted - 10/01/2005 :  14:23:19   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send ronnywhite a Private Message
That is interesting; along those lines, a year ago or so I read about a couple of researchers who were going to tackle the question with new technologies (real time PET scans etc.) and "Take the spooky stuff out of it"... I think they were near San Diego. That kind of technology has already had some facinating, if not astounding demonstrations (e.g. elsewhere, that monkey who "learned" to control a video game "hands-free"... incredible.) At the present rate of development, faster computers etc. should be neat to see what they have to say about "conciousness" in another 10 years or so.




Ron White
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 10/01/2005 :  23:28:33   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message
markie even included smileys. He was joking, folks. Spoofing himself.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Siberia
SFN Addict

Brazil
2322 Posts

Posted - 10/02/2005 :  08:06:14   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Siberia's Homepage  Send Siberia an AOL message  Send Siberia a Yahoo! Message Send Siberia a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Dave W.

markie even included smileys. He was joking, folks. Spoofing himself.


Sorry man. My bad.

"Why are you afraid of something you're not even sure exists?"
- The Kovenant, Via Negativa

"People who don't like their beliefs being laughed at shouldn't have such funny beliefs."
-- unknown
Go to Top of Page

ronnywhite
SFN Regular

501 Posts

Posted - 10/02/2005 :  11:27:47   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send ronnywhite a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Dave W.

... even included smileys...


I gotta try those, problem is part of time I plug cell into laptop with no graphics for speed- can't see icons- might forget left from right, write something idiotic as joke ("At my Aryan Creationist meeting last night...") mean to hit "Smiley" and hit "Damn Serious" or "Angry" face. Or Satan might switchem' on me. I'll writem' down.

Ron White
Edited by - ronnywhite on 10/02/2005 11:36:57
Go to Top of Page

H. Humbert
SFN Die Hard

USA
4574 Posts

Posted - 10/02/2005 :  12:14:29   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send H. Humbert a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Dave W.

markie even included smileys. He was joking, folks. Spoofing himself.

I don't think so, Dave. He included smileys after saying he found the thread and again after saying he knew the correlation existed "intuitively," which I took as merely acknowledging my previously voiced concerns with such claims. I didn't read markie as actually being facetious, however.

No smileys follow the second half of his post which, to be perfectly honest, sounds no different than anything he's asserted in the past. You may be right, perhaps he was spoofing himself, but there is nothing in his post currently to make me suspect you're correct.

I guess markie will have to clear the matter up himself.


"A man is his own easiest dupe, for what he wishes to be true he generally believes to be true." --Demosthenes

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool." --Richard P. Feynman

"Face facts with dignity." --found inside a fortune cookie
Edited by - H. Humbert on 10/02/2005 12:16:12
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Next Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.14 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000