quote:

---

Originally posted by Espritch

quote:

---

* And its cosmology (in which mankind is an inconsequential accident)

Then, of course, there's the liberal creation myth: Charles Darwin's theory of evolution.

For liberals, evolution is the touchstone that separates the enlightened from the benighted. But Coulter neatly refutes the charade that liberals are rationalists guided by the ideals of free inquiry and the scientific method. She exposes the essential truth about Darwinian evolution that liberals refuse to confront: it is bogus science.

---

She's hardly the only one, Espritch! Philip Johnson more or less kicked off the ID movement with his Darwin on Trial, but (as the title subtlely suggests), Johnson's a law school professor and not trained in any sort of science. Strangely, for the anti-evolutionist crowd, the norm is not to have any science background, but rather to be trained in things like law, theology, journalism, or yelling.

So Miss Coulter has determined that Evolution is bogus science? Would someone please refresh my memory as to why she is qualified to make such a determination?

---