Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Creation/Evolution
 Dennett answers NY Times on Dawkins’ book
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 16

Kil
Evil Skeptic

USA
13477 Posts

Posted - 01/04/2010 :  11:36:59   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Kil's Homepage  Send Kil an AOL message  Send Kil a Yahoo! Message Send Kil a Private Message
Originally posted by H. Humbert

Originally posted by filthy
...and the composers of the Bible were scarcely experts in Natural History.
Except Matt believes the bible is the infallible word of god. The "author of all living things" should be the natural history expert. It is important to highlight such errors because they cast doubt upon the assertion of divine authorship.

Or at the very least, that the bible should be taken literally, even by believers.

There are plenty of Christians and Jews who believe that the bible is divinely inspired, but also take many of its stories, like Genesis, as an allegorical truth and not a literal truth.

Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.

Why not question something for a change?

Genetic Literacy Project
Go to Top of Page

H. Humbert
SFN Die Hard

USA
4574 Posts

Posted - 01/04/2010 :  12:11:00   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send H. Humbert a Private Message
Originally posted by Kil
There are plenty of Christians and Jews who believe that the bible is divinely inspired, but also take many of its stories, like Genesis, as an allegorical truth and not a literal truth.
What's the allegorical truth of a 4-legged grasshopper? If the details of a larger allegory are factually incorrect, then we can still conclude that the allegory wasn't authored by a divine intelligence.


"A man is his own easiest dupe, for what he wishes to be true he generally believes to be true." --Demosthenes

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool." --Richard P. Feynman

"Face facts with dignity." --found inside a fortune cookie
Go to Top of Page

Kil
Evil Skeptic

USA
13477 Posts

Posted - 01/04/2010 :  13:14:30   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Kil's Homepage  Send Kil an AOL message  Send Kil a Yahoo! Message Send Kil a Private Message
Originally posted by H. Humbert

Originally posted by Kil
There are plenty of Christians and Jews who believe that the bible is divinely inspired, but also take many of its stories, like Genesis, as an allegorical truth and not a literal truth.
What's the allegorical truth of a 4-legged grasshopper? If the details of a larger allegory are factually incorrect, then we can still conclude that the allegory wasn't authored by a divine intelligence.

It's easy enough to demonstrate to Matt (whether he takes it in or not) that Genesis can't be taken literally. And that other stories in the bible can't be taken literally. And that's where we are at in the discussion. If you want to take on the larger point, go ahead. But I have my doubts about how productive that will be in this debate.

Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.

Why not question something for a change?

Genetic Literacy Project
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 01/04/2010 :  13:29:57   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message
Originally posted by bngbuck

Filthy.....

Due to my somewhat spotty attendance record here, I must have missed the thread referencing the "four-legged grasshopper" and it's relevance to evolutionary theory.

Would you mind giving me the reference to the original thread; or better, briefly restating the essence of the discussion that involved the lubber grasshopper, it's legs, and their significance to evolutionary biology?

Dave brought it up a couple of times in this thread, asking where the fossils of it were. I think that it's relevance is simply that of any prey species: lunch for others, even including ourselves.

Eastern Lubbers are really neat. The one pictured is a nymph on the cusp of adulthood. As a small child, in FL, I used to collect them. I also collected scorpions, much to my parent's shock & despair.

I will, in my warm and generous way, also give Matt the cud-chewing bunny, which, to the best of my memory, hasn't been brought up as yet. Lagomorphs don't actually chew the cud, but what they really do amounts to pretty much the same thing.




"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Edited by - filthy on 01/04/2010 13:32:36
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 01/04/2010 :  17:34:53   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message
Originally posted by filthy

I will, in my warm and generous way, also give Matt the cud-chewing bunny, which, to the best of my memory, hasn't been brought up as yet.
Well, I figured it would be kind of tough to tell from a fossil whether a bunny chewed cud or not. A four-legged grasshopper fossil ought to be a snap.

Next, matt can give us the "exact scientific evidence" for that bizarro census that allegedly took place while Mary was preggers.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 01/04/2010 :  18:30:20   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message
Originally posted by Dave W.

Originally posted by filthy

I will, in my warm and generous way, also give Matt the cud-chewing bunny, which, to the best of my memory, hasn't been brought up as yet.
Well, I figured it would be kind of tough to tell from a fossil whether a bunny chewed cud or not. A four-legged grasshopper fossil ought to be a snap.

Next, matt can give us the "exact scientific evidence" for that bizarro census that allegedly took place while Mary was preggers.
Oh, that's a good one that I'd completely forgotten! But then it's been a while since I stuck my nose in the Bible.

A fossil in reasonably good condition could identify it as a lagomorph, all of which re-ingest their food. So the possibility is there, and I'd love to see someone try it.




"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 01/04/2010 :  19:21:11   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message
This thread has been locked due to length. Please continue the discussion here.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 16 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.23 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000