|
the_ignored
SFN Addict
2562 Posts |
 Posted - 02/19/2010 : 02:22:03
|
Typical creationist play: Attack the character of a "darwinist" in order to throw aspertions on the theory itself. (ie. the "consequences of a belief" fallacy)
So transparent, it's odd that he's denying that that's what he's actuallly doing while at the same time, trying to show people the "consequences" of the theory.
Wonder if my reply will actually get in...
Hat Tip to PZ Myers.
|
>From: enuffenuff@fastmail.fm
(excerpt follows):
> I'm looking to teach these two bastards a lesson they'll never forget.
> Personal visit by mates of mine. No violence, just a wee little chat.
>
> **** has also committed more crimes than you can count with his
> incitement of hatred against a religion. That law came in about 2007
> much to ****'s ignorance. That is fact and his writing will become well
> know as well as him becoming a publicly known icon of hatred.
>
> Good luck with that fuckwit. And Reynold, fucking run, and don't stop.
> Disappear would be best as it was you who dared to attack me on my
> illness knowing nothing of the cause. You disgust me and you are top of
> the list boy. Again, no violence. Just regular reminders of who's there
> and visits to see you are behaving. Nothing scary in reality. But I'd
> still disappear if I was you.
What brought that on? this. Original posting here.
Another example of this guy's lunacy here. |
|
Slimy Sal Cordova
